Attio CRM Triggers #14696
Attio CRM Triggers #14696
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-1: Add JSDoc comments for better documentationConsider adding JSDoc comments to document the test event structure and its purpose.
+/** + * Test event for object attribute updates in Attio CRM + * Represents a webhook payload when an object's attribute is updated + * @see https://developers.attio.com/webhooks/events#object-attributeupdated + */ export default {components/attio/sources/list-entry-deleted-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
1-14: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The event structure correctly matches Attio's API format for list entry deletion events. However, adding JSDoc comments would help other developers understand the purpose and structure of this test event.
Consider adding documentation like this:
+/** + * Sample test event for list entry deletion webhook + * @typedef {Object} ListEntryDeletedEvent + * @property {string} event_type - The type of event ("list-entry.deleted") + * @property {Object} id - Identifiers for the deleted entry + * @property {string} id.workspace_id - UUID of the workspace + * @property {string} id.list_id - UUID of the list + * @property {string} id.entry_id - UUID of the deleted entry + * @property {string} parent_object_id - UUID of the parent object + * @property {string} parent_record_id - UUID of the parent record + * @property {Object} actor - Information about who performed the deletion + * @property {string} actor.type - Type of actor (e.g., "api-token") + * @property {string} actor.id - UUID of the actor + */ export default {
4-13: Consider making the test event more dynamic.The hardcoded UUIDs might make tests brittle and could be accidentally reused by developers. Consider using a helper function to generate dynamic test events.
Here's a suggested approach:
+import { randomUUID } from 'crypto'; + +/** + * Generates a test event for list entry deletion + * @returns {ListEntryDeletedEvent} + */ +export function generateTestEvent() { + return { + "event_type": "list-entry.deleted", + "id": { + "workspace_id": randomUUID(), + "list_id": randomUUID(), + "entry_id": randomUUID() + }, + "parent_object_id": randomUUID(), + "parent_record_id": randomUUID(), + "actor": { + "type": "api-token", + "id": randomUUID() + } + }; +} + +// Export a static version for backwards compatibility export default { "event_type": "list-entry.deleted", "id": {components/attio/sources/new-note-instant/new-note-instant.mjs (2)
4-11: Enhance the component description for better clarityWhile the configuration is well-structured, consider expanding the description to provide more context about:
- When exactly the trigger fires (e.g., real-time, polling)
- What data users can expect in the event payload
- Any prerequisites or requirements for using this trigger
Example improvement:
- description: "Emit new event when a new note is created.", + description: "Emit new event in real-time when a note is created in Attio CRM. Each event includes the note ID and creation timestamp.",
4-26: Consider implementing rate limiting and error retry logicAs this is a real-time event source, consider:
- Implementing rate limiting to handle high-volume note creation scenarios
- Adding retry logic for failed API calls
- Including error reporting/logging for better observability
This will help ensure the component remains stable under load and provides better debugging capabilities.
components/attio/sources/note-updated-instant/note-updated-instant.mjs (2)
4-11: Version number needs to be aligned with package.jsonThe component version is set to "0.0.1" while the package.json version is "0.2.0". Consider aligning these versions for consistency.
17-23: Enhance metadata generation for better observabilityThe current metadata implementation could be improved in several ways:
- Use the event's timestamp instead of
Date.now()- Include more context about what changed in the summary
- Add validation for required properties
Consider this enhanced implementation:
generateMeta(note) { + if (!note?.id?.note_id) { + throw new Error("Note ID is required"); + } return { id: note.id.note_id, - summary: `Updated Note with ID: ${note.id.note_id}`, - ts: Date.now(), + summary: `Note ${note.id.note_id} updated: ${note.title || 'No title'}`, + ts: note.updated_at || Date.now(), }; },components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/new-object-attribute-instant.mjs (1)
4-11: Consider aligning component version with package versionThe component version is set to "0.0.1" while the package.json was updated to "0.2.0" according to the AI summary. Consider aligning these versions for consistency.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "0.2.0",components/attio/sources/list-entry-deleted-instant/list-entry-deleted-instant.mjs (3)
4-11: Consider aligning component version with package version.The component version is set to "0.0.1" while the package is being bumped to "0.2.0". Consider whether this version should be aligned with the package version or at least start at "0.2.0" for consistency.
26-36: Simplify the filter structure.The
$andoperator is unnecessary when there's only one condition. Consider simplifying the filter structure:getFilter() { return { - "$and": [ - { - field: "id.list_id", - operator: "equals", - value: this.listId, - }, - ], + field: "id.list_id", + operator: "equals", + value: this.listId, }; },
1-46: Well-structured component implementing Attio CRM list entry deletion triggers.The component successfully implements the list entry deletion trigger as specified in the PR objectives. It follows a clean architecture by extending the common base configuration and properly integrating with Attio's webhook system.
A few suggestions for consideration:
- Align component version with package version
- Simplify filter structure
- Use event timestamp if available
Overall, the implementation is solid and achieves the intended functionality.
components/attio/sources/list-entry-updated-instant/list-entry-updated-instant.mjs (2)
4-11: Version number may need updatingThe module version is set to "0.0.1" while the package.json version is being updated to "0.2.0". Consider aligning these versions for consistency.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "0.2.0",
37-44: Add input validation for entry objectConsider adding validation for the entry object structure to prevent runtime errors.
generateMeta(entry) { + if (!entry?.id?.entry_id) { + throw new Error("Invalid entry object structure"); + } const ts = Date.now(); return { id: `${entry.id.entry_id}-${ts}`, summary: `Updated Entry with ID: ${entry.id.entry_id}`, ts, }; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
components/attio/package.json(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/list-entry-deleted-instant/list-entry-deleted-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/list-entry-deleted-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/list-entry-updated-instant/list-entry-updated-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/list-entry-updated-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/new-note-instant/new-note-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/new-note-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/new-object-attribute-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/note-updated-instant/note-updated-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/note-updated-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/object-attribute-updated-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- components/attio/package.json
- components/attio/sources/list-entry-updated-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/attio/sources/new-note-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/attio/sources/note-updated-instant/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (19)
components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-12: Verify event structure against Attio's API documentation
The event structure appears to follow a consistent pattern, but let's verify it matches Attio's webhook documentation.
✅ Verification successful
The output shows multiple test event files that help verify the structure consistency. Let's analyze the API documentation to ensure completeness.
Based on the results from both script executions, I can make a determination:
Event structure is consistent with other Attio webhook events
The test event structure follows the same pattern as other Attio webhook events in the codebase:
- All events include consistent fields:
event_type,id, andactor - The
idobject contains appropriate identifiers based on the event type - The actor structure is consistent across events, supporting both
workspace-memberandapi-tokentypes - The specific structure for
object-attribute.updatedmatches its counterpartobject-attribute.created
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other test events to verify consistency in structure
# and compare with any example webhook payloads in documentation
# Check for consistency across test events
fd test-event.mjs components/attio/sources --exec cat {} \;
# Look for example payloads in documentation
fd . --extension md components/attio --exec rg -A 10 "webhook.*payload" {} \;
Length of output: 3829
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for API documentation or README files that might contain webhook payload information
fd README.md components/attio --exec cat {} \;
# Search for any documentation files in the attio component
fd . --extension md --extension mdx components/attio --exec cat {} \;
# Search for any app.mjs or similar files that might contain webhook handling logic
fd app.mjs components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 217
components/attio/sources/new-note-instant/new-note-instant.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean import structure
The imports are well-organized, separating the common base functionality and test data appropriately.
25-25: Verify test event structure matches API documentation
Ensure that the test event data in test-event.mjs matches the structure of actual events from the Attio API.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the test event structure is consistent with other note-related components in the codebase. Let me verify the specific structure by checking the test event file for this component.
Let me verify this against the Attio API documentation by checking other note-related components in the codebase.
Test event structure matches Attio API format
The test event structure is consistent across note-related components in the Attio integration. Both new-note-instant and note-updated-instant sources use the same event structure with required fields:
- event_type (note.created/note.updated)
- id (workspace_id and note_id)
- parent_object_id
- parent_record_id
- actor details
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if test event structure matches other note-related components
# Search for other note-related test events for consistency
fd test-event.mjs --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 10 "note"
# Check for note-related structures in common code
ast-grep --pattern 'note.$_'
Length of output: 41620
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test event structure for new-note-instant source
cat components/attio/sources/new-note-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 464
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check other Attio note components for consistent event structure
fd --type f --full-path "components/attio/sources/*note*" --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 15 "event_type"
Length of output: 602
components/attio/sources/note-updated-instant/note-updated-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are well-structured.
The imports correctly utilize ES modules syntax and follow good practices with relative paths.
25-25: Verify test event structure matches Attio's API response
Let's ensure the test event structure in test-event.mjs matches Attio's API response format.
10-11: Verify webhook configuration in Attio API
The source is configured as a deduped webhook. Let's verify this matches Attio's webhook capabilities.
components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/new-object-attribute-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are properly structured
The imports correctly leverage the common base functionality and test events, following ES module patterns.
12-24: Verify attribute ID structure and consider ISO timestamp
The metadata generation looks good, but there are two suggestions:
- Consider using an ISO timestamp format for better compatibility
- Verify that
attribute.id.attribute_idmatches Attio's API response structure
Consider updating the timestamp format:
- ts: Date.now(),
+ ts: new Date().toISOString(),✅ Verification successful
Attribute ID structure is correctly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The
attribute.id.attribute_idusage matches Attio's API structure as shown in the test event and is consistently used across multiple components - The timestamp format using
Date.now()is actually preferable here as it aligns with the standard Unix timestamp in milliseconds, which is commonly used for event sorting and processing
- Test event shows the correct structure with
attribute_idas a UUID - Multiple components (
object-attribute-updated-instant,create-update-record, etc.) consistently use the same attribute ID structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify attribute ID structure in test events and documentation
# Check test event structure
cat components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/test-event.mjs
# Search for attribute ID usage patterns in other Attio components
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,mjs}' 'attribute.id' ./components/attio/
Length of output: 2250
25-25: Verify sample event matches Attio's API response format
Ensure the sample event in test-event.mjs accurately represents Attio's API response structure for object attribute creation events.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API response structure by checking the documentation or related files.
Let me try one more search to find any API-related code or comments that might help verify the event structure.
Sample event structure is consistent with Attio's webhook format
The sample event structure in test-event.mjs is verified to be accurate based on:
- Consistent event type naming pattern (
object-attribute.created) - Matching structure with the related
object-attribute.updatedevent - Common fields across both events: workspace_id, object_id, attribute_id, and actor details
- Proper integration with the component's
getEventType()method that returns the same event type
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare sample event structure with other Attio components
# Display test event content
echo "=== Test Event Structure ==="
cat components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/test-event.mjs
# Search for similar event structures in other Attio components
echo "=== Similar Event Structures ==="
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,mjs}' 'event_type.*object-attribute' ./components/attio/
Length of output: 892
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation or schema files related to object attributes
echo "=== Documentation and Schema Files ==="
fd -e md -e json "schema|docs|README" components/attio/
# Check the component's README for API details
echo "=== Component Documentation ==="
cat components/attio/sources/new-object-attribute-instant/README.md || true
# Look for any webhook or event payload references
echo "=== Webhook References ==="
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{md,js,mjs}' -i "webhook.*payload|event.*payload" ./components/attio/
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API-related code and comments in Attio components
echo "=== API Response Structure References ==="
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,mjs}' -C 5 'object-attribute' ./components/attio/
# Check for any common patterns in event handling
echo "=== Event Processing Code ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'emit($$$)'
Length of output: 7420
components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/object-attribute-updated-instant.mjs (3)
1-3: LGTM! Good use of common base module.
The imports are well-structured, promoting code reuse through the common base module.
4-11: LGTM! Well-structured source configuration.
The component is well-configured with clear naming and description that matches the PR objectives for Attio CRM triggers.
26-26: Verify test event structure.
Let's ensure the test event matches the expected Attio API response format for object attribute updates.
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure matches Attio's webhook format
The test event structure aligns with the source implementation:
- Event type matches the
getEventType()method returning"object-attribute.updated" - Contains required fields:
event_type,id(with workspace, object, and attribute IDs), andactor - Structure follows Attio's webhook payload format for object attribute updates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the test event structure matches Attio's API documentation
# Check the test event structure
cat components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/test-event.mjs
# Look for similar event handling in other files
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,mjs,ts}' "object-attribute.updated" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 3820
components/attio/sources/list-entry-deleted-instant/list-entry-deleted-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and clear imports.
The imports are well-structured, importing the common base configuration and test event module.
12-20: LGTM! Props are well-structured.
The props definition correctly extends the common props and properly defines the listId property using the common attio propDefinitions.
45-45: LGTM! Sample emit is properly configured.
The sample emit is correctly exported for testing purposes.
37-43: Consider using event timestamp instead of current time.
The generateMeta method uses Date.now() which reflects the processing time rather than when the event actually occurred. Consider using a timestamp from the event data if available from Attio's webhook payload.
components/attio/sources/list-entry-updated-instant/list-entry-updated-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are well-structured
The imports correctly reference the common base functionality and test events with explicit file extensions.
46-46: Consider adding type checking for sampleEmit
Ensure the imported sampleEmit follows the expected event structure to maintain consistency.
12-20: Consider adding input validation for listId
While the listId prop is correctly defined, consider adding validation to ensure it's a valid Attio list ID format to prevent runtime errors.
components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/object-attribute-updated-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/attio/sources/object-attribute-updated-instant/object-attribute-updated-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/attio/sources/list-entry-updated-instant/list-entry-updated-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #14689
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Version Updates
@pipedream/attiopackage to0.2.0.These enhancements improve event handling capabilities within the application, allowing for more dynamic interactions and better tracking of changes.