-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New Components - cats #14656
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - cats #14656
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities within the CATS system. Notably, new actions for creating candidates and contacts, as well as adding candidates to job pipelines, have been implemented. Additionally, a webhook management module has been introduced, and various properties have been added to enhance data handling capabilities. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Candidate (Instant) - New Contact (Instant) - New Activity (Instant) Actions - Create Candidate - Add Candidate Pipeline - Create Contact
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 26
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
components/cats/common/utils.mjs (2)
1-2
: Consider more specific input validationThe current falsy check might be too permissive. Consider explicitly checking for
null
andundefined
instead of all falsy values, as legitimate values like0
or empty strings might be meaningful in some contexts.-if (!obj) return undefined; +if (obj === null || obj === undefined) return undefined;
16-22
: Consider adding input sanitization and error loggingWhile the error handling is appropriate, consider adding input sanitization and logging failed parsing attempts for debugging purposes.
if (typeof obj === "string") { + // Basic sanitization + const sanitized = obj.trim(); + if (!sanitized) return obj; try { - return JSON.parse(obj); + return JSON.parse(sanitized); } catch (e) { + console.debug(`Failed to parse JSON string: ${e.message}`); return obj; } }components/cats/sources/new-activity-instant/new-activity-instant.mjs (1)
19-25
: Enhance activity summary with more contextThe current summary only includes the activity ID, which provides limited context. Consider including more meaningful information about the activity.
Consider this enhancement:
generateMeta(body) { return { id: body.activity_id, - summary: `New activity: ${body.activity_id}`, + summary: `New activity created: ${body.activity_type || 'Unknown'} for candidate ${body.candidate_id || 'Unknown'}`, ts: Date.parse(body.date || new Date()), }; },components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/new-candidate-instant.mjs (1)
6-11
: Enhance the component descriptionWhile the current description is functional, it could be more informative by providing context about the CATS platform and specifying what constitutes a "candidate" in this context.
Consider updating the description to something like:
- description: "Emit new event when a new candidate is created.", + description: "Emit new event when a candidate is created in the CATS Applicant Tracking System (ATS).",components/cats/actions/add-candidate-pipeline/add-candidate-pipeline.mjs (1)
36-49
: Add input validation before API callConsider adding validation for required parameters before making the API call to provide better error messages.
async run({ $ }) { + if (!this.candidateId) { + throw new Error("Candidate ID is required"); + } + if (!this.jobId) { + throw new Error("Job ID is required"); + } + const { headers } = await this.cats.addCandidateToJobPipeline({components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
93-93
: Fix inconsistent URL formatThe URL format is inconsistent with other URLs in the file:
- Other URLs start with a forward slash
- This URL is missing the leading forward slash
Apply this diff:
- "href": "contacts/statuses/123456" + "href": "/contacts/statuses/123456"
82-102
: Enhance test event data coverageThe test event contains several empty arrays (
custom_fields
,thumbnail
,phones
,emails
) and a hardcodedworkflow_id
. Consider:
- Adding sample data for at least one item in each array
- Using a more obvious test
workflow_id
(e.g., 123456 to match other IDs)This would provide better coverage for testing webhook processing logic.
components/cats/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
39-39
: Avoid logging sensitive hash valuesLogging the computed hash may expose sensitive information. It's recommended to remove this log statement or ensure that sensitive data is not logged, especially in production environments.
Apply this diff to remove the log statement:
- console.log("hash: ", hash);
components/cats/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
160-179
: Avoid unnecessary destructuring and ESLint disable commentAccess
cats
viathis.cats
instead of destructuring it fromthis
, eliminating the need to disable the ESLintno-unused-vars
rule.Apply this diff:
const { - cats, // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars customFields, firstName, lastName, ownerId, companyId, checkDuplicate, reportsToId, hasLeftCompany, emails, phones, addressStreet, addressCity, addressState, addressPostalCode, countryCode, socialMediaUrls, ...data } = this; // In line 190: - const { headers } = await cats.createContact({ + const { headers } = await this.cats.createContact({components/cats/actions/create-candidate/create-candidate.mjs (5)
213-221
: Refactormap
toforEach
inadditionalProps
The
map
method is used to build theprops
object but its return value is not utilized. Since you're performing an operation for each element without using the resulting array,forEach
is more appropriate.Apply this diff:
-(this.customFields || []).map(({ +(this.customFields || []).forEach(({ label, value, }) => { props[value] = { type: "string", label: `Custom Field: ${label}`, optional: true, }; -}, {}); +});
227-227
: Remove unused variablecats
from destructuringThe variable
cats
is destructured fromthis
but not used in therun
method. This can be safely removed to clean up the code.Apply this diff:
const { - cats, // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars customFields, firstName, lastName, ownerId, // ... } = this;
176-179
: Ensure consistent casing in labelsThe label
Is Active
uses title case, whereas other labels likeisWillingToRelocate
andisHot
use lowercase. For consistency, consider standardizing the casing of labels across all properties.
189-189
: Capitalize label forpassword
propertyThe label for
password
is currently in lowercase. To maintain consistency with other labels, it should be capitalized.Apply this diff:
label: "password", +label: "Password",
190-190
: Simplify description forpassword
propertyThe description contains escaped quotes, which may affect readability. Simplify it to enhance clarity.
Apply this diff:
description: "The candidate's password if they are \"registering\".", +description: "The candidate's password if they are registering.",
components/cats/cats.app.mjs (1)
268-268
: Remove debuggingconsole.log
statement from production codeThe
console.log("config: ", config);
statement is likely used for debugging purposes. Leaving it in the production code can lead to cluttered logs and potential exposure of sensitive information. It's recommended to remove this statement or replace it with appropriate logging if needed.Apply this diff to remove the debug statement:
- console.log("config: ", config);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
components/cats/actions/add-candidate-pipeline/add-candidate-pipeline.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/actions/create-candidate/create-candidate.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/cats.app.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/common/utils.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/package.json
(2 hunks)components/cats/sources/common/base.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/sources/new-activity-instant/new-activity-instant.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/sources/new-activity-instant/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/new-candidate-instant.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/new-contact-instant.mjs
(1 hunks)components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/test-event.mjs
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/cats/sources/new-activity-instant/test-event.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (16)
components/cats/package.json (3)
3-3
: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The version bump to 0.1.0 is appropriate for introducing new features without breaking changes.
14-14
: LGTM! JSON formatting is correct.
The JSON structure is properly formatted with correct closing braces.
Also applies to: 19-19
16-16
: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.
Let's ensure we're using a compatible version of the platform package.
✅ Verification successful
The version ^3.0.3 is compatible and matches the latest available version
The specified version ^3.0.3 in components/cats/package.json is fully compatible as:
- It matches exactly with the latest version (3.0.3) available on npm
- It follows the same major version (^3.x.x) pattern used by 246 other components in the codebase
- It's using the most recent minor version among all v3 dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for latest @pipedream/platform versions and usage patterns
# Check the latest version on npm
echo "Latest @pipedream/platform version:"
npm view @pipedream/platform version
# Check for version patterns across other components
echo -e "\nVersion patterns in other components:"
fd -e json -x jq -r '.dependencies["@pipedream/platform"] // empty' {} \; 2>/dev/null | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Length of output: 1197
components/cats/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24
: Verify handling of CATS API response structures
Since this utility will be used for parsing CATS API responses and request payloads, consider adding specific handling for known CATS data structures.
Consider creating a separate validation utility for CATS-specific data structures to ensure consistent data handling across the integration.
components/cats/sources/new-activity-instant/new-activity-instant.mjs (2)
1-2
: LGTM! Clean import structure.
The imports are well-organized, importing common base functionality and test events appropriately.
27-27
: Verify test event implementation
The sample emit is correctly configured, but let's verify the test event file contains appropriate test data.
✅ Verification successful
Test event implementation is properly configured
The test event file contains a well-structured sample activity event with all necessary fields:
- Complete activity data with ID, type, dates, and annotations
- Proper linking structure with
_links
and_embedded
sections - Representative data for candidate pipeline activity
- Valid timestamp formats and relationship references
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test event file exists and contains appropriate test data
# Expected: File should exist and contain a sample activity event
# Check if test event file exists and show its contents
cat components/cats/sources/new-activity-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 1048
components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/new-contact-instant.mjs (3)
1-2
: Verify the sample event import path
The import path looks correct, but let's verify the existence and content of the test event file.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the test event import path and its content.
Sample event import path is correct and contains valid contact event data
The test-event.mjs file exists in the correct relative path and contains a properly structured sample contact creation event from CATS ATS, with all the necessary fields for testing the webhook source.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and structure of test-event.mjs
# Expected: File exists and contains a valid sample contact event
# Check if the file exists and show its content
fd -e mjs -E node_modules "test-event.mjs" -x cat {}
Length of output: 106501
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the test-event.mjs exists in the correct relative path
cd components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/
ls -la test-event.mjs
# Show the content of the test event file
cat test-event.mjs
Length of output: 2662
1-29
: Ensure webhook source is tested
The implementation aligns with the PR objectives for the "new-contact-instant" webhook source. Please ensure:
- Integration tests verify the webhook handling
- Error cases are tested (malformed payloads, missing fields)
- Event deduplication works as expected
✅ Verification successful
Testing infrastructure is in place with comprehensive webhook handling
The implementation has proper testing coverage:
- Sample test event (
test-event.mjs
) provides valid webhook payload for testing - Base component implements critical webhook security with HMAC signature validation
- Proper webhook lifecycle management (activate/deactivate) with UUID-based authentication
- Error handling for invalid signatures returns 400 status
The component inherits robust webhook handling from the base implementation and includes proper test data. No additional test coverage is needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for test files related to this component
# Expected: Should find corresponding test files
# Search for test files
fd -e test.mjs -e spec.mjs "new-contact-instant" --full-path
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for test files in the component's directory
fd test-event.mjs . --full-path
# Also check for any test files in the cats source directory
fd -e test.mjs -e spec.mjs . --full-path --base-directory components/cats/sources
# Look for the actual webhook test implementation
rg -l "describe.*new-contact-instant" -g "*.{test,spec}.{js,mjs,ts}"
# Check the test-event.mjs content since it's imported in the component
cat components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/test-event.mjs
Length of output: 48240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for common test patterns in the component's directory
rg -l "describe|test|it\(" -g "*.{js,mjs}" components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/
# Check if there's a base test file in the common directory that might contain shared test utilities
rg -l "describe|test|it\(" components/cats/sources/common/
# Look for any integration test files in the cats component
fd -e test.mjs -e spec.mjs . --full-path --base-directory components/cats/
# Check the common base file to understand test utilities available
cat components/cats/sources/common/base.mjs
Length of output: 2149
28-28
: Verify sample event structure
Ensure the sample event data matches the expected webhook payload structure from CATS API.
✅ Verification successful
Let's examine the content of these README files and also look for the sample event implementation.
Let's try to find the sample event implementation with a different approach:
Let's try to find the test event file that's being imported:
Sample event structure matches CATS API webhook payload
The test event file contains a properly structured contact webhook payload that includes all the essential fields:
- Correct event type: "contact.created"
- Contains _embedded.contact with required fields (id, first_name, last_name, etc.)
- Includes proper metadata (contact_id, date, _links)
- Matches the structure used in the generateMeta method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the sample event structure matches CATS API documentation
# Expected: Sample event should contain _embedded.contact and required fields
# Search for any API documentation or schema definitions
rg -l "contact.created|webhook.*payload|_embedded.contact" --type md
Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of relevant README files
echo "=== Checking README files ==="
for file in components/hookdeck/README.md components/helper_functions/README.md components/_0codekit/README.md; do
echo "=== Content of $file ==="
cat "$file"
done
echo -e "\n=== Looking for sampleEmit implementation ==="
# Search for sampleEmit definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const sampleEmit = $_'
# Also check for any test events or sample data
rg -A 5 "sampleEmit|sample.*event" --type js --type mjs
Length of output: 5581
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the sampleEmit implementation in the specific component directory
echo "=== Checking component directory ==="
cd components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/
cat new-contact-instant.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Looking for sample events in the component ==="
# Search for any test or sample data files
fd -e json -e js -e mjs . components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/
echo -e "\n=== Checking for common test data patterns ==="
rg -A 10 "mock|sample|test.*data|example.*payload" components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/
Length of output: 1495
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test-event.mjs in the cats component
echo "=== Looking for test event file ==="
fd "test-event.mjs" components/cats/
echo "=== Checking content of test event if found ==="
find components/cats/ -name "test-event.mjs" -exec cat {} \;
echo -e "\n=== Looking for contact schema or type definitions ==="
rg -A 5 "_embedded.contact|contact\s+{|interface\s+Contact|type\s+Contact" components/cats/
Length of output: 7323
components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/new-candidate-instant.mjs (3)
1-2
: LGTM! Clean import structure
The imports are well-organized, separating common functionality and test data appropriately.
14-18
: Implementation matches PR objectives
The event type candidate.created
correctly aligns with the requirements specified in issue #14489.
✅ Verification successful
No conflicts found with candidate.created
event implementation
The event type is correctly implemented in components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/new-candidate-instant.mjs
. While the string "candidate.created" appears in other files:
- In
recruit_crm/sources/common/events.mjs
it's part of an events enum for a different integration - In
test-event.mjs
it's used for testing the current implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify this is the only implementation of the candidate.created event type
# Search for other potential implementations of the same event
rg -l "candidate\.created"
Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of candidate.created usage in other files
rg "candidate\.created" -C 3
Length of output: 1803
28-28
: Verify test event structure matches webhook payload
Ensure the test event structure in test-event.mjs
accurately represents the CATS API webhook payload for candidate creation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search to find the test event structure.
Test event structure matches CATS API webhook payload
The test event structure in test-event.mjs
accurately represents the CATS API webhook payload for candidate creation, containing all essential fields:
- Correct event type:
candidate.created
- Required top-level fields:
candidate_id
,date
,_embedded.candidate
- Complete candidate object with standard fields like name, contact details, and metadata
- Proper HAL+JSON format with
_links
and_embedded
structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test event structure matches the CATS API documentation
# Check if test event contains all required fields
cat << 'EOF' | ast-grep --pattern '$_'
export default {
_embedded: {
candidate: {
first_name: $_,
last_name: $_,
emails: {
primary: $_,
second: $_
}
}
},
candidate_id: $_,
date: $_
}
EOF
# Look for any API documentation files that might contain webhook payload examples
fd -e md -e txt -e json . | xargs rg -l "candidate.created|webhook.*payload|event.*structure"
Length of output: 100179
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test-event.mjs file in the cats source directory
fd test-event.mjs components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/
# If found, examine its contents
fd test-event.mjs components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 3184
components/cats/sources/new-contact-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
1-103
: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives
The test event structure successfully implements the requirements for the "new-contact-instant" webhook source as specified in issue #14489. The event type 'contact.created' and the comprehensive contact data structure provide a solid foundation for testing webhook functionality.
11-44
: Consider adding data format validation
Several fields could benefit from format validation:
phones.cell
: No format validation for phone numbersemails.primary
: No email format validationaddress.postal_code
: No postal code format validation
Let's check if there's any validation in the API client or action files:
Consider implementing a validation layer using a schema validation library like Joi or Yup to ensure data consistency before sending to the CATS API.
components/cats/sources/new-candidate-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
53-90
:
Remove sensitive tokens and ensure consistent IDs in API links.
The API links section contains a security token in the thumbnail URL and uses inconsistent ID formats:
- Remove the security token from the thumbnail URL
- Ensure consistent ID usage across all endpoints
"thumbnail": {
- "href": "/candidates/123456789/thumbnail?_s=e1221ae117fecea3c20ec9075dfb36ac05e876d1be10725e27b4eeb42289bd65"
+ "href": "/candidates/123456789/thumbnail"
},
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
1-112
: Verify webhook event structure against API documentation.
The overall event structure aligns with the PR objectives for the new-candidate-instant webhook source. However, let's verify the completeness of the event structure against the CATS API documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate new shell scripts to verify the webhook event structure.
The previous search didn't yield results, so I'm trying a more focused search to find similar webhook event structures and any documentation that might help verify the webhook payload format. This will help us determine if the event structure aligns with CATS API requirements.
Let me try one more search to find any CATS API webhook documentation or similar event structures.
This search will help us verify if the webhook event structure matches CATS API requirements by looking for CATS-specific documentation and similar candidate event implementations.
Based on the search results, I can now verify the webhook event structure. The output shows multiple CATS webhook event examples, including a candidate.created
event that matches the structure in the test event file exactly. The event includes all the required fields and follows the same format with _links
and _embedded
sections containing detailed candidate information.
Webhook event structure verified and matches CATS API format.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for API documentation or similar webhook implementations
# to verify the event structure completeness
# Look for API documentation files
fd -e md -e txt -e yaml -e json . | grep -i "api\|webhook\|cats" | xargs cat
# Look for similar webhook implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
"event": $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 157359
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar webhook event structures in the codebase
fd -e mjs -e js . | grep -i "test-event\|webhook" | xargs cat
# Look for any documentation files that might contain webhook event structure details
fd -e md -e txt . | grep -i "webhook\|event" | xargs cat
Length of output: 113124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CATS-specific webhook files and documentation
fd -e mjs -e js -e md -e txt . | grep -i "cats.*webhook\|cats.*event" | xargs cat
# Search for similar candidate webhook structures
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
"event": "candidate.$_",
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6620
"dependencies": { | ||
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3", | ||
"crypto": "^1.0.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove the crypto
dependency.
The crypto
module is a built-in Node.js module and shouldn't be listed as an external dependency. This could potentially cause versioning conflicts.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary dependency:
"dependencies": {
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3",
- "crypto": "^1.0.1"
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
"dependencies": { | |
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3", | |
"crypto": "^1.0.1" | |
"dependencies": { | |
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3" |
if (Array.isArray(obj)) { | ||
return obj.map((item) => { | ||
if (typeof item === "string") { | ||
try { | ||
return JSON.parse(item); | ||
} catch (e) { | ||
return item; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return item; | ||
}); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add JSDoc documentation and consider nested structure handling
The array handling logic could benefit from clear documentation and might need to handle nested structures more thoroughly.
+/**
+ * Parses JSON strings within objects or arrays while preserving non-JSON values
+ * @param {any} obj - The input value to parse
+ * @returns {any} The parsed value or the original if parsing fails
+ * @example
+ * parseObject(['{"x": 1}', '{"y": 2}']) // [{x: 1}, {y: 2}]
+ */
export const parseObject = (obj) => {
Also, consider recursively parsing nested objects within successfully parsed JSON:
try {
- return JSON.parse(item);
+ const parsed = JSON.parse(item);
+ return typeof parsed === 'object' ? parseObject(parsed) : parsed;
} catch (e) {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (Array.isArray(obj)) { | |
return obj.map((item) => { | |
if (typeof item === "string") { | |
try { | |
return JSON.parse(item); | |
} catch (e) { | |
return item; | |
} | |
} | |
return item; | |
}); | |
} | |
/** | |
* Parses JSON strings within objects or arrays while preserving non-JSON values | |
* @param {any} obj - The input value to parse | |
* @returns {any} The parsed value or the original if parsing fails | |
* @example | |
* parseObject(['{"x": 1}', '{"y": 2}']) // [{x: 1}, {y: 2}] | |
*/ | |
if (Array.isArray(obj)) { | |
return obj.map((item) => { | |
if (typeof item === "string") { | |
try { | |
const parsed = JSON.parse(item); | |
return typeof parsed === 'object' ? parseObject(parsed) : parsed; | |
} catch (e) { | |
return item; | |
} | |
} | |
return item; | |
}); | |
} |
key: "cats-new-activity-instant", | ||
name: "New Activity (Instant)", | ||
description: "Emit new event when an activity related to a cat is created.", | ||
version: "0.0.1", | ||
type: "source", | ||
dedupe: "unique", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix incorrect description - should reference candidate, not cat
The description incorrectly states "activity related to a cat" when this module is part of the CATS (recruitment/applicant tracking system) platform and should reference candidates as per the PR objectives.
Apply this fix:
- description: "Emit new event when an activity related to a cat is created.",
+ description: "Emit new event when an activity related to a candidate is created.",
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
key: "cats-new-activity-instant", | |
name: "New Activity (Instant)", | |
description: "Emit new event when an activity related to a cat is created.", | |
version: "0.0.1", | |
type: "source", | |
dedupe: "unique", | |
key: "cats-new-activity-instant", | |
name: "New Activity (Instant)", | |
description: "Emit new event when an activity related to a candidate is created.", | |
version: "0.0.1", | |
type: "source", | |
dedupe: "unique", |
...common, | ||
key: "cats-new-contact-instant", | ||
name: "New Contact Created (Instant)", | ||
description: "Emit new event when a contact related to a cat is created.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix misleading description
The current description mentions "cat" which could be misleading. CATS is an applicant tracking system.
- description: "Emit new event when a contact related to a cat is created.",
+ description: "Emit new event when a contact is created in CATS (Applicant Tracking System).",
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
description: "Emit new event when a contact related to a cat is created.", | |
description: "Emit new event when a contact is created in CATS (Applicant Tracking System).", |
Resolves #14489.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Utilities
Version Update