[Components] cloze - New components #14639
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and functionalities to the Cloze application, including the creation and updating of notes, companies, and projects. It also implements webhook management for tracking significant changes in company, project, and person data. Additionally, constants and utility functions for API interactions are defined. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-22: Enhance test event coverageThe test event provides a good baseline but could be improved in several ways:
- The
changesobject is empty, which doesn't effectively test change detection- Some fields like segment, stage, and step are set to "none", which might not represent real-world scenarios
- The timestamps are using future dates (year 2024)
Consider enhancing the test event with:
"changes": {}, + "changes": { + "name": { + "old": "test 1", + "new": "test 1 upd 3" + }, + "stage": { + "old": "prospect", + "new": "none" + } + }, "company": { "syncKey": "test-sync-key-123", "name": "test 1 upd 3", "visibility": "visible", "views": [ "my", "defined" ], - "firstSeen": 1731443475576, - "lastChanged": 1731453402556, + "firstSeen": 1699443475576, + "lastChanged": 1699453402556, "domains": [ "test.com" ], "segment": "enterprise", - "stage": "none", + "stage": "customer", - "step": "none", + "step": "negotiation", "assignee": "[email protected]" },🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
10-11: Update timestamps to use realistic past datesThe timestamps are set to 2024 (1731443475576 ≈ July 2024). For test fixtures, it's better to use past dates to avoid confusion.
Consider using timestamps from 2023 or earlier.
20-21: Add sample changes to improve test coverageThe empty changes object doesn't provide good test coverage. Real person change events would typically include what actually changed.
Consider adding sample changes:
- "changes": {}, + "changes": { + "name": { + "old": "test 1", + "new": "test 1 upd 3" + }, + "segment": { + "old": "lead", + "new": "none" + } + },components/cloze/cloze.app.mjs (2)
8-10: Add path parameter validation and normalizationThe URL construction could be more robust by adding path parameter validation and normalization to prevent issues with malformed URLs.
Consider this improvement:
getUrl(path) { + if (!path) { + throw new Error("Path parameter is required"); + } + const normalizedPath = path.startsWith('/') ? path : `/${path}`; return `${constants.BASE_URL}${constants.VERSION_PATH}${normalizedPath}`; },
32-37: Consider adding other HTTP method wrappersFor completeness and future-proofing, consider adding wrappers for other common HTTP methods (GET, PUT, DELETE, PATCH).
Example implementation:
post(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", ...args, }); }, +get(args = {}) { + return this._makeRequest({ + method: "GET", + ...args, + }); +}, +put(args = {}) { + return this._makeRequest({ + method: "PUT", + ...args, + }); +}, +delete(args = {}) { + return this._makeRequest({ + method: "DELETE", + ...args, + }); +},components/cloze/common/utils.mjs (2)
26-47: Improve parseArray function's error handling and validationThe function could benefit from more specific error handling and validation:
- The error message should indicate what was received vs expected
- Consider validating array elements
- The handling of falsy values should be more explicit
Consider this improved implementation:
function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { - return; + return undefined; // Explicit return for clarity } if (Array.isArray(value)) { + // Optional: Add validation for array elements + // value.forEach((item, index) => { + // if (typeof item !== 'string' && typeof item !== 'object') { + // throw new Error(`Invalid array element at index ${index}`); + // } + // }); return value; } const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { - throw new Error("Not an array"); + throw new Error(`Expected an array, but got ${typeof parsedValue}`); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError("Make sure the custom expression contains a valid array object"); + throw new ConfigurationError( + `Invalid array input: ${e.message}. Please provide a valid JSON array or array object.` + ); } }
49-51: Improve clarity of the exported function compositionWhile the current implementation works, the function composition could be more explicit and easier to understand.
Consider this more explicit implementation:
export default { - parseArray: (value) => parseArray(value)?.map(parseJson), + parseArray: (value) => { + const array = parseArray(value); + return array ? array.map(parseJson) : undefined; + }, };components/cloze/actions/create-note/create-note.mjs (2)
44-49: Consider adding schema validation for additionalDataThe additionalData prop accepts any object structure without validation.
Consider adding a schema validation to ensure the additional data meets the API requirements:
additionalData: { type: "object", label: "Additional Data", description: "Additional details for the note in JSON format. [See the documentation](https://api.cloze.com/api-docs/#!/Content/post_v1_createcontent).", optional: true, validate: (value) => { // Add schema validation based on API requirements const allowedKeys = ["key1", "key2"]; // Replace with actual allowed keys const invalidKeys = Object.keys(value).filter(key => !allowedKeys.includes(key)); if (invalidKeys.length > 0) { throw new Error(`Invalid additional data keys: ${invalidKeys.join(", ")}`); } }, },
77-77: Enhance success message with note detailsThe success message could be more informative.
Consider including the note ID in the success message:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully created note."); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created note with ID: ${response.id}`);components/cloze/actions/create-update-project/create-update-project.mjs (2)
73-78: Consider adding schema validation for additionalData.The additionalData prop accepts any object structure. Consider adding schema validation to ensure the data matches the API requirements.
additionalData: { type: "object", label: "Additional Data", description: "Additional details for the project in JSON format. [See the documentation](https://api.cloze.com/api-docs/#!/Relations_-_Projects/post_v1_projects_create).", optional: true, + validate: { + type: "object", + properties: { + // Add expected properties based on API documentation + }, + }, },
81-86: Consider adding error handling in createProject method.The method could benefit from basic error handling to provide more context when API calls fail.
createProject(args = {}) { + const { path = "/projects/create", ...rest } = args; + if (!path) { + throw new Error("Path is required for project creation"); + } return this.app.post({ - path: "/projects/create", + path, ...args, - }); + }).catch((error) => { + throw new Error(`Failed to create/update project: ${error.message}`); + }); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
components/cloze/.gitignore(0 hunks)components/cloze/actions/create-note/create-note.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/actions/create-update-company/create-update-company.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/actions/create-update-project/create-update-project.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/app/cloze.app.ts(0 hunks)components/cloze/cloze.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/package.json(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/common/events.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/common/webhook.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/company-change-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/person-change-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/project-change-instant/project-change-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/cloze/sources/project-change-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/cloze/.gitignore
- components/cloze/app/cloze.app.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/cloze/common/constants.mjs
- components/cloze/sources/common/events.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/test-event.mjs
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/test-event.mjs
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
components/cloze/sources/project-change-instant/test-event.mjs
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
components/cloze/package.json (2)
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility
The package depends on @pipedream/[email protected]. Let's ensure this is the latest stable version compatible with other components.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the latest @pipedream/platform version
# and verify version consistency across other components
# Find other component package.json files and extract their @pipedream/platform versions
fd "package.json" --type f | xargs grep -l "@pipedream/platform" | xargs jq -r '.dependencies["@pipedream/platform"]'3-3: Verify the main entry point exists
The main entry point has changed from dist/app/cloze.app.mjs to cloze.app.mjs. Please ensure this file exists in the correct location.
Also applies to: 5-5
✅ Verification successful
Main entry point exists and no references to the old path found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the main entry point file
# and check for any other potential references to the old path
# Check if the new main file exists
fd "cloze.app.mjs" --type f
# Check for any remaining references to the old path
rg "dist/app/cloze.app.mjs"
Length of output: 9414
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new main entry point and absence of the old path.
# Check if 'cloze.app.mjs' exists
fd "cloze.app.mjs" --type f
# Ensure no references to the old main entry point
rg "dist/app/cloze.app.mjs"
Length of output: 86
components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
3-3:
Review the syncKey value for potential security concerns
While this is a test file, the syncKey appears to be a sensitive value that could potentially be a real API key or token. Even in test files, it's recommended to use obviously fake values to prevent accidental exposure of credentials.
Consider replacing with an obviously fake value like "test-sync-key-123".
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-22: Overall structure looks good with room for improvement
The test event structure correctly implements the person-change-instant webhook requirements from issue #14609. The data structure includes all necessary fields for person changes.
Consider the above suggestions to:
- Use an obviously fake syncKey
- Update timestamps to past dates
- Add sample change data
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
components/cloze/sources/project-change-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
3-3: False positive: syncKey is not an API key
The syncKey appears to be a hash or identifier for synchronization purposes, not an actual API key. The static analysis warning can be safely ignored.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
1-22: Verify test event structure completeness
The test event structure should match the actual webhook payload from Cloze API for comprehensive testing. Please verify:
- Are there any additional fields that Cloze sends in their webhook payload?
- The
changesobject is empty - should it contain sample changed fields?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/person-change-instant.mjs (3)
5-12: LGTM! Configuration follows best practices
The module configuration is well-structured with:
- Clear naming and description with documentation link
- Appropriate initial version
- Proper deduplication strategy
26-26: Verify sample event structure
Let's ensure the sample event follows the expected structure for testing.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify sample event structure in test-event.mjs
# Check if test-event.mjs exports an event with required properties
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
person: {
syncKey: $_,
lastChanged: $_,
$$$
}
}'1-3: Verify imported module dependencies
The imports look correct syntactically, but let's verify the existence and exports of the referenced modules.
components/cloze/sources/project-change-instant/project-change-instant.mjs (3)
5-12: LGTM! Well-structured source configuration
The configuration follows best practices with:
- Clear naming and description with API documentation link
- Proper versioning
- Appropriate deduplication strategy for webhooks
26-26: Verify the sample event structure
Let's ensure the test event follows the expected structure for project change events.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the sample event structure
# Check the test event implementation
echo "Checking test event structure..."
rg "export.*default" -A 10 --type js "test-event.mjs"1-3: Verify the imported modules and their exports
The imports look appropriate for a webhook source implementation.
Let's verify the existence and exports of the imported modules:
components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/company-change-instant.mjs (3)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
The imports correctly bring in the required dependencies for webhook functionality, event constants, and test data.
26-26: Verify test event structure matches API response.
Ensure that the sample event in test-event.mjs accurately represents the Cloze API response structure.
✅ Verification successful
Test event structure matches API response.
The sample event in test-event.mjs accurately represents the Cloze API response structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the test event file and examine its structure
cat components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/test-event.mjs
# Check if the structure is consistent with other Cloze components
rg -l "test-event.mjs" components/cloze/
Length of output: 789
5-12: Verify API documentation link and consider version number.
The configuration looks good, but please:
- Verify that the API documentation link is permanent and accessible
- Consider starting with version "1.0.0" since this is a production component
✅ Verification successful
API documentation link is accessible and version number is appropriate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the API documentation link
curl -I https://api.cloze.com/api-docs/#!/Webhooks/post_v1_subscribe
# Check if this is the first version by looking for previous versions
rg -l "cloze-company-change-instant"
Length of output: 1439
components/cloze/cloze.app.mjs (1)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports and proper component structure.
The imports and basic component setup follow Pipedream's best practices.
components/cloze/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM: Clean import statement
The import is correctly using named import for better tree-shaking optimization.
components/cloze/actions/create-note/create-note.mjs (1)
6-6: Verify the API documentation link accessibility
Let's ensure the API documentation link is accessible and points to the correct endpoint.
✅ Verification successful
API documentation link is accessible and valid
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the API documentation link
# Expected: The URL should return a successful response
curl -I "https://api.cloze.com/api-docs/#!/Content/post_v1_createcontent"
Length of output: 1329
components/cloze/actions/create-update-project/create-update-project.mjs (3)
1-9: LGTM! Component metadata is well-structured.
The imports and component metadata are properly defined with appropriate documentation links and versioning.
1-115: Verify consistency with other Cloze components.
Let's ensure this component follows the same patterns as other Cloze components in the PR.
✅ Verification successful
Component structure and error handling are consistent with other Cloze components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar patterns in other Cloze components
echo "Checking component structure..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
key: "cloze-$_",
name: $_,
description: $_,
version: $_,
type: "action",
$$$
}' components/cloze/actions/
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg "throw new Error" components/cloze/
Length of output: 515
64-71: Review and update segment options.
The segment options appear to be generic placeholders (project1-5). Consider replacing these with actual meaningful segment names based on the Cloze API documentation.
components/cloze/actions/create-update-company/create-update-company.mjs (1)
1-9: LGTM! Module configuration follows Pipedream's component structure.
The imports, module configuration, and documentation links are well-defined.
components/cloze/sources/person-change-instant/person-change-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/cloze/sources/project-change-instant/project-change-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/cloze/sources/company-change-instant/company-change-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/cloze/actions/create-update-company/create-update-company.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
WHY
Resolves #14609
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
.gitignorefile, which may affect version control for certain files.Documentation
package.jsonto reflect new versioning and dependencies.Chores