Slack message action edits #14586
Slack message action edits #14586
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request includes updates to various Slack action components, primarily focusing on version increments across multiple files. The changes encompass the addition of new components for sending messages to channels and users or groups, as well as updates to existing components, including enhancements to method handling and error management. The modifications do not alter the core functionality of the components, which continue to execute their defined actions as intended. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs (2)
4-10: Consider enhancing the description for clarity.While the current description is good, it could be more specific about the supported channel types to better align with the PR's objective of having distinct actions for different recipient types.
- description: "Send a message to a public or private channel. [See the documentation](https://api.slack.com/methods/chat.postMessage)", + description: "Send a message specifically to public or private Slack channels (does not support direct messages or user groups). [See the documentation](https://api.slack.com/methods/chat.postMessage)",
13-25: Enhance the conversation prop description.The current description could be more specific about the channel types supported and any limitations.
- description: "Select a public or private channel", + description: "Select a public or private channel (note: direct messages and user groups are not supported in this action)",components/slack/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (1)
Line range hint
42-42: Enhance the success message with file details.Consider making the success message more informative by including the uploaded file name.
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully uploaded file"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully uploaded file: ${this.content.split("/").pop()}`);components/slack/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs (2)
Line range hint
22-33: Simplify conversation prop definition.The conditional types in the conversation prop make the component more complex than necessary. This complexity should be eliminated by splitting into two separate actions, each with its own focused conversation type definition.
After splitting the actions:
- Channel action should only use
[constants.CHANNEL_TYPE.PUBLIC, constants.CHANNEL_TYPE.PRIVATE]- User/Group action should use appropriate user/group types
Review comment is accurate - Implementation needs to be updated
The verification confirms the review comment's concerns. While the new split actions (
send-message-to-channel.mjsandsend-message-to-user-or-group.mjs) have been created with the correct specialized functionality, the originalsend-message.mjsfile still exists and contains the contradicting implementation with thechannelTypeproperty.To resolve this:
- Remove
components/slack/actions/send-message/send-message.mjsas it's been replaced by the new specialized actions- Keep the new split actions which are correctly implemented:
send-message-to-channel.mjsfor public/private channelssend-message-to-user-or-group.mjsfor users and groups🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
13-45: Implementation contradicts PR objectives.According to the PR objectives, this component should be split into two separate actions ("Slack - Send Message to Channel" and "Slack - Send Message to User or Group"), and the
channelTypeproperty should be removed. However, the implementation shows:
- The component still exists as a single action
- The
channelTypeproperty has been added instead of removed- The component name and description don't reflect the intended split structure
This implementation appears to be moving in the opposite direction of the stated objectives.
Let's verify if the new split actions exist:
Recommendations:
- Remove the
channelTypeproperty and its associated logic- Split this component into two separate action files as specified in the PR objectives
- Update the component's name and description to reflect its specific purpose after the split
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new split actions exist in the components directory # Expected: Find new files for the split actions echo "Searching for new Slack message actions..." fd -t f "send-message-to-.*\.mjs$" components/slack/actions/Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify if the file under review is actually being removed or replaced fd "send-message.mjs$" components/slack/actions/ # Let's also check the content of the new files to verify they handle specific channel types echo "=== Content of send-message-to-channel.mjs ===" cat components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs echo -e "\n=== Content of send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs ===" cat components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjsLength of output: 3296
components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs (1)
Line range hint
31-41: Add error handling for async operations.The async methods
getGeneratedBlocksandrunshould include try-catch blocks to handle potential errors gracefully.Consider applying this improvement:
async getGeneratedBlocks() { + try { return await buildBlocks.run.call(this); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to generate blocks: ${error.message}`); + } }, async run({ $ }) { + try { this.blocks = await this.getGeneratedBlocks(); const resp = await common.run.call(this, { $, }); return resp; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to send block kit message: ${error.message}`); + } },components/slack/actions/send-message-advanced/send-message-advanced.mjs (2)
Line range hint
46-58: Add error handling for block generation.While the methods maintain proper context through
call(this), the block generation could benefit from explicit error handling.Consider adding try-catch blocks:
async getGeneratedBlocks() { - return await buildBlocks.run.call(this); + try { + return await buildBlocks.run.call(this); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to generate blocks:', error); + throw new Error(`Block generation failed: ${error.message}`); + } } async run({ $ }) { if (this.passArrayOrConfigure) { - this.blocks = await this.getGeneratedBlocks(); + try { + this.blocks = await this.getGeneratedBlocks(); + } catch (error) { + $.export('error', error); + throw error; + } } const resp = await common.run.call(this, { $ }); return resp; }
The advanced message component should be deprecated in favor of the new split actions
Based on the git history and file listing, I can confirm that:
- Two new specific actions have been added:
send-message-to-channelfor sending messages to public/private channelssend-message-to-user-or-groupfor sending messages to users/groups- These new components properly implement the split functionality with specific channel type restrictions and dedicated implementations.
The "Send Message (Advanced)" component should be marked as deprecated since its functionality is now better served by the new, more focused components that align with the PR's objective of splitting the message sending functionality.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
4-9: Verify component alignment with PR objectives.The PR aims to split the Slack "Send Message" action into two separate actions ("Send Message to Channel" and "Send Message to User or Group"). However, this component's name and description still reflect the general "Send Message (Advanced)" functionality.
Consider:
- Whether this component should be deprecated in favor of the new split actions
- How this component relates to the new channel/user specific actions
Let's check for the new split components:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Look for new channel/user specific message components # Expected: Find new component files for channel and user message actions echo "Searching for new Slack message components..." fd -e mjs -e js . components/slack/actions | grep -i "send.*message"Length of output: 294
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for message-related components echo "Searching for message-related components in Slack actions..." fd . components/slack/actions -t f -e mjs -e js # Let's also check the content of the common implementation echo -e "\nChecking common implementation..." cat components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs # Look for any PR-related changes in git history echo -e "\nChecking recent changes..." git log --patch --grep="split.*message" --grep="send.*message" -iLength of output: 14535
components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs (1)
5-11: Consider enhancing the component description.While the current description is clear, it could be more informative by mentioning key features like support for multiple users and group messaging capabilities.
- description: "Send a message to a user or group. [See the documentation](https://api.slack.com/methods/chat.postMessage)", + description: "Send a message to one or multiple users, or to a group conversation (multi-person IM). Supports markdown formatting. [See the documentation](https://api.slack.com/methods/chat.postMessage)",components/slack/actions/send-large-message/send-large-message.mjs (1)
Line range hint
68-74: Fix the response variable overwrite in message sending logic.There's a bug in the message sending logic where the
responsefromscheduleMessageis immediately overwritten bypostMessage. This means the scheduled message response is lost and the wrong response might be processed.Apply this diff to fix the logic:
let response; if (this.post_at) { obj.post_at = this.post_at; response = await this.slack.sdk().chat.scheduleMessage(obj); + } else { + response = await this.slack.sdk().chat.postMessage(obj); } - - response = await this.slack.sdk().chat.postMessage(obj);components/slack/sources/new-keyword-mention/new-keyword-mention.mjs (1)
Line range hint
89-117: Consider enhancing error handling in processEvent method.While the current implementation works, the error handling in the
processEventmethod could be improved:
- Console logs for ignored events could be more informative
- The message type check could benefit from constants
- The keyword check could be case-insensitive
Consider applying these improvements:
async processEvent(event) { const { type: msgType, subtype, bot_id: botId, text, } = event; if (msgType !== "message") { - console.log(`Ignoring event with unexpected type "${msgType}"`); + console.log(`Ignoring event with unexpected type "${msgType}" for channel ${event.channel}`); return; } // This source is designed to just emit an event for each new message received. // Due to inconsistencies with the shape of message_changed and message_deleted // events, we are ignoring them for now. If you want to handle these types of // events, feel free to change this code!! if (subtype && !constants.ALLOWED_SUBTYPES.includes(subtype)) { - console.log(`Ignoring message with subtype. "${subtype}"`); + console.log(`Ignoring message with subtype "${subtype}" in channel ${event.channel}`); return; } if ((this.ignoreBot) && (subtype === constants.SUBTYPE.BOT_MESSAGE || botId)) { + console.log(`Ignoring bot message from ${botId || 'unknown bot'}`); return; } let emitEvent = false; - if (text.indexOf(this.keyword) !== -1) { + if (text.toLowerCase().includes(this.keyword.toLowerCase())) { emitEvent = true; } else if (subtype === constants.SUBTYPE.PD_HISTORY_MESSAGE) { emitEvent = true; }components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs (2)
173-175: Consider adding validation in getChannelId()Good encapsulation of the channel ID logic. However, consider adding validation to handle cases where both
conversationandreply_channelare undefined.getChannelId() { - return this.conversation ?? this.reply_channel; + const channelId = this.conversation ?? this.reply_channel; + if (!channelId) { + throw new Error('No channel specified. Either conversation or reply_channel must be set.'); + } + return channelId; }
213-213: Remove unnecessary awaitThe
getChannelId()method is synchronous and doesn't return a Promise, making theawaitkeyword unnecessary here.- channel: await this.getChannelId(), + channel: this.getChannelId(),components/slack/slack.app.mjs (1)
122-122: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The improved initialization of
userNamesensures consistent handling of the promise. However, consider adding error handling for theuserNamespromise to gracefully handle potential API failures.- userNames = await this.userNames(), + userNames = await this.userNames().catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to fetch user names:', error); + return {}; // Fallback to empty mapping + }),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
components/slack/actions/add-emoji-reaction/add-emoji-reaction.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/archive-channel/archive-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs(2 hunks)components/slack/actions/create-channel/create-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/create-reminder/create-reminder.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/delete-file/delete-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/delete-message/delete-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/find-message/find-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/find-user-by-email/find-user-by-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/get-file/get-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/invite-user-to-channel/invite-user-to-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/kick-user/kick-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-channels/list-channels.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-files/list-files.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-group-members/list-group-members.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-members-in-channel/list-members-in-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-replies/list-replies.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/reply-to-a-message/reply-to-a-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-large-message/send-large-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message-advanced/send-message-advanced.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/set-channel-description/set-channel-description.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/set-channel-topic/set-channel-topic.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/set-status/set-status.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/update-group-members/update-group-members.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/update-message/update-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/verify-slack-signature/verify-slack-signature.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/package.json(1 hunks)components/slack/slack.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-channel-created/new-channel-created.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-direct-message/new-direct-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-interaction-event-received/new-interaction-event-received.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-keyword-mention/new-keyword-mention.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-message-in-channels/new-message-in-channels.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-reaction-added/new-reaction-added.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-saved-message/new-saved-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/sources/new-user-mention/new-user-mention.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (32)
- components/slack/actions/add-emoji-reaction/add-emoji-reaction.mjs
- components/slack/actions/archive-channel/archive-channel.mjs
- components/slack/actions/create-channel/create-channel.mjs
- components/slack/actions/create-reminder/create-reminder.mjs
- components/slack/actions/delete-file/delete-file.mjs
- components/slack/actions/delete-message/delete-message.mjs
- components/slack/actions/find-message/find-message.mjs
- components/slack/actions/find-user-by-email/find-user-by-email.mjs
- components/slack/actions/get-file/get-file.mjs
- components/slack/actions/invite-user-to-channel/invite-user-to-channel.mjs
- components/slack/actions/kick-user/kick-user.mjs
- components/slack/actions/list-channels/list-channels.mjs
- components/slack/actions/list-files/list-files.mjs
- components/slack/actions/list-group-members/list-group-members.mjs
- components/slack/actions/list-members-in-channel/list-members-in-channel.mjs
- components/slack/actions/list-replies/list-replies.mjs
- components/slack/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs
- components/slack/actions/reply-to-a-message/reply-to-a-message.mjs
- components/slack/actions/set-channel-description/set-channel-description.mjs
- components/slack/actions/set-channel-topic/set-channel-topic.mjs
- components/slack/actions/set-status/set-status.mjs
- components/slack/actions/update-group-members/update-group-members.mjs
- components/slack/actions/update-message/update-message.mjs
- components/slack/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs
- components/slack/actions/verify-slack-signature/verify-slack-signature.mjs
- components/slack/package.json
- components/slack/sources/new-channel-created/new-channel-created.mjs
- components/slack/sources/new-direct-message/new-direct-message.mjs
- components/slack/sources/new-interaction-event-received/new-interaction-event-received.mjs
- components/slack/sources/new-message-in-channels/new-message-in-channels.mjs
- components/slack/sources/new-saved-message/new-saved-message.mjs
- components/slack/sources/new-user-mention/new-user-mention.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (17)
components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Good use of shared functionality.
The imports are well-organized, leveraging common functionality and constants to maintain consistency and reduce code duplication.
38-38: Verify prop spreading order.
The spread of common.props at the end could potentially override the explicitly defined props above. Consider moving it to the beginning of the props object to ensure your specific prop definitions take precedence.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check common.props content to identify potential prop conflicts
# Expected: List of props from common module to review for conflicts
# Search for props definition in common send-message module
rg -A 10 'props\s*=' "../common/send-message.mjs"4-5: Verify integration with common module.
The component spreads the common module functionality, but we should verify that it properly integrates with the common module's run method and the new getChannelId() functionality mentioned in the summary.
components/slack/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (1)
9-9: Verify if version increment is necessary.
The version bump from "0.0.23" to "0.0.24" appears to be part of a broader version update across Slack components. Since this file is not directly related to the message action changes described in the PR objectives, let's verify if this version increment is necessary.
✅ Verification successful
The previous output shows this is a new file being added with version 0.0.23 and then immediately bumped to 0.0.24. We need more context about the PR and related changes to understand if this version bump is part of a coordinated update across Slack components.
Version bump is part of coordinated update across Slack components
The version increment from "0.0.23" to "0.0.24" is valid as it's part of a coordinated version update across all Slack components. The git history and diff shows:
- This is a new file that was recently added with version "0.0.23"
- The version bump is part of a commit titled "versions" that updates versions across all Slack components
- All other Slack actions and sources also received similar patch version increments in the same commit
This systematic version update across the Slack component ecosystem appears to be intentional and follows a consistent pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any functional changes in this file that would justify a version bump
# Test 1: Check git history for any recent changes to this file besides version
git log -p -- components/slack/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs | grep -v 'version:' -A 5
# Test 2: Check if other Slack components have similar version updates
fd -e mjs -e js . components/slack/actions/ -x grep -l '"version": "0.0.24"' {}
Length of output: 2622
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for related changes in the PR that might justify version updates
git log --oneline -n 10
# Check for any functional changes in Slack components
git diff HEAD~1 -- components/slack/
# Check other Slack component versions to understand the versioning pattern
fd -e mjs -e js . components/slack/actions/ -x grep -l '"version":' {} | xargs cat | grep '"version":'
Length of output: 24823
components/slack/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs (1)
9-9: LGTM: Version increment is appropriate.
The version bump from "0.0.15" to "0.0.16" is appropriate for these changes.
components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs (2)
Line range hint 4-8: LGTM! Clean component structure.
The component follows good practices by:
- Using composition to inherit functionality from common and buildBlocks
- Maintaining clear separation of concerns
- Having a descriptive name and documentation link
Line range hint 13-19: Verify conversation prop compatibility with new action split.
Given that the PR splits Slack message actions into channel-specific and user-specific variants, the conversation prop might need updates to align with this separation.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have failed due to path issues. These broader searches should help us understand the prop definitions and their usage in the new split architecture.
The previous searches failed due to incorrect paths. Let's first understand the repository structure and locate the relevant files.
From the directory structure, we can see that Slack actions have been split into channel-specific and user-specific variants. Let's examine these files to understand how the conversation prop is handled in the new architecture.
The conversation prop in block kit message is compatible with the new action split
The current implementation is correct and doesn't need updates because:
- The base
conversationprop insend-block-kit-messageis intentionally unrestricted, allowing it to work with all conversation types (channels, users, and groups) - This aligns with the block kit builder's purpose of being a flexible message composer that can target any conversation type
- The specialized actions (
send-message-to-channelandsend-message-to-user-or-group) handle the channel/user separation with restricted conversation types, while this component maintains its general-purpose nature
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any related changes in the conversation prop implementation
rg -l 'conversation.*propDefinition' components/slack/actions/
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the conversation prop usage
rg -A 5 "conversation.*prop" components/slack/actions/
# Also check for any channel or user specific props
rg -A 5 "channel.*prop|user.*prop" components/slack/actions/
# Let's also check the common props definition
cat components/slack/common/props.mjs
Length of output: 225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct paths in the repository
fd -t f props.mjs
# Let's also check the directory structure to understand the new split architecture
fd -t d . components/slack/actions/
# And look for any files that might contain the conversation prop definition
fd -t f . components/slack/ -x grep -l "conversation"
Length of output: 4231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the new split message actions to understand the prop patterns
cat components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs
cat components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs
cat components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs
# Also check the block kit message implementation
cat components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs
Length of output: 11077
components/slack/actions/send-message-advanced/send-message-advanced.mjs (2)
10-10: LGTM: Version increment is appropriate.
The patch version bump (0.0.2 → 0.0.3) correctly reflects the backwards-compatible changes being made.
Line range hint 13-45: Verify props alignment with PR objectives.
The PR mentions removing the channelType property, but we should verify:
- Whether the
conversationprop needs updates to support the split into channel/user specific actions - If the
channelTypeproperty was actually removed from the common implementation
Let's check the common implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for channelType property in common implementation
# Expected: Confirm removal of channelType
echo "Checking for channelType in common implementation..."
rg -l "channelType" components/slack/actions/common/components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and appropriate imports.
The imports are well-organized and properly leverage common functionality and platform features.
53-58: LGTM! Clean method implementation.
The openConversation method is well-implemented with good flexibility through the optional args parameter.
51-73: Verify integration with common methods.
The component extends common functionality. Let's verify the integration points.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the common methods integration.
Let me try a different approach to locate and analyze the common methods.
Let me check the specific common methods being used in this context.
Integration with common methods is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The component correctly extends the common send-message functionality using spread operator
- The
getChannelId()method appropriately overrides the base implementation to handle user/group specific logic - Error handling follows the platform's standard using
ConfigurationError - No conflicts exist between common methods and component-specific implementations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify common methods integration and error handling
# Test 1: Check for any overridden methods from common
echo "Checking for common method implementations..."
rg -l "common\.methods\." components/slack/actions/common/
# Test 2: Verify error handling consistency
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg "ConfigurationError" components/slack/actions/
Length of output: 1136
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the common methods implementation
echo "Checking common.methods implementation..."
cat components/slack/actions/common/common.mjs
# Check for other components using similar pattern
echo -e "\nChecking other components using common.methods..."
rg -A 3 "methods: \{.*common\.methods" components/slack/actions/
Length of output: 398
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the common file location first
echo "Locating common file..."
fd common.mjs components/slack/
# Check for spread operator usage with common.methods
echo -e "\nChecking usage of common.methods..."
rg -A 5 "\.\.\.common\.methods" components/slack/
# Check for any other files importing common
echo -e "\nChecking imports of common..."
rg "import.*common.*from" components/slack/
Length of output: 8124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the send-message.mjs common file content
echo "Checking send-message.mjs common implementation..."
cat components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs
# Check for any method overrides in the component
echo -e "\nChecking for method implementations in the component..."
cat components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs
Length of output: 8835
components/slack/actions/send-large-message/send-large-message.mjs (1)
8-8: LGTM: Version bump is consistent.
The version increment from "0.0.19" to "0.0.20" aligns with similar updates across other Slack action components in this PR.
components/slack/sources/new-reaction-added/new-reaction-added.mjs (1)
8-8: Version bump needs clarification.
The version increment from 1.1.22 to 1.1.23 appears unrelated to the PR's main objective of splitting the Slack "Send Message" action. Could you clarify why this file needs a version update?
Let's check if other Slack components have similar version bumps:
components/slack/sources/new-keyword-mention/new-keyword-mention.mjs (1)
9-9: Verify the necessity of this version bump.
The version increment from "0.0.4" to "0.0.5" appears to be part of coordinated updates across Slack components. However, since this source component is unrelated to the PR's main objective of splitting Slack message actions, let's verify if this version bump is necessary.
✅ Verification successful
Version bump is part of a coordinated update across all Slack components
The version bump from "0.0.4" to "0.0.5" in new-keyword-mention.mjs is part of a coordinated version update across all Slack components. The git diff shows that all Slack components (actions and sources) have received patch version increments in this PR, indicating a systematic update rather than changes specific to this component's functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any dependent components or shared utilities that require this version bump
# Test 1: Look for any imports or references to this component
rg -l "new-keyword-mention"
# Test 2: Check for other version bumps in Slack components
fd -e mjs -e js . components/slack/ --exec grep -l '"version":'
Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for changes in this PR
# Check git diff for any functional changes in this file
git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- components/slack/sources/new-keyword-mention/new-keyword-mention.mjs
# Check for any changes in other Slack components that might be related
git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- components/slack/
# Look for any package.json changes that might justify version bumps
git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- '**/package.json'
Length of output: 25335
components/slack/actions/common/send-message.mjs (1)
Line range hint 173-213: Changes align well with PR objectives
The introduction of getChannelId() and simplified channel handling support the PR's goal of splitting the Slack message action and removing the channelType property. The changes make the code more maintainable and easier to extend for the new separate actions.
components/slack/slack.app.mjs (1)
Line range hint 1-1006: Consider updating the component to fully support the new message actions.
Based on the PR objectives to split the Slack "Send Message" action and remove the channelType property, several architectural changes should be considered:
- Remove or deprecate
channelType-related code - Add new prop definitions for the split message actions
- Update documentation to reflect the new message action structure
- Add validation methods for the new message action parameters
This will ensure the component fully supports the new "Send Message to Channel" and "Send Message to User or Group" actions.
components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
* new send-message actions * pnpm-lock.yaml * versions
Resolves #14581
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Version Updates
add-emoji-reaction: 0.0.11 → 0.0.12archive-channel: 0.0.19 → 0.0.20create-channel: 0.0.20 → 0.0.21delete-file: 0.0.19 → 0.0.20send-message: 0.0.15 → 0.0.16upload-file: 0.0.23 → 0.0.24Bug Fixes