Tremendous new component #14351
Tremendous new component #14351
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughA new module named "Create Order Email Reward" has been introduced to facilitate the creation of orders for sending rewards. This module includes configurable properties such as Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/tremendous/common/constants.mjs (2)
1-15: Fix inconsistent punctuation in labelsThe labels have inconsistent punctuation - some end with periods while others don't.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
{ value: "EMAIL", - label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by email", + label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by email.", }, { value: "LINK", label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient via a link.", }, { value: "PHONE", - label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by SMS", + label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by SMS.", },
11-14: Consider aligning value with label descriptionThe value "PHONE" might be confusing when the label specifically mentions SMS delivery. Consider using "SMS" as the value to maintain consistency with the label's description.
{ - value: "PHONE", + value: "SMS", label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by SMS.", },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
components/tremendous/actions/create-order-email-reward/create-order-email-reward.mjs(1 hunks)components/tremendous/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/tremendous/package.json(1 hunks)components/tremendous/tremendous.app.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/tremendous/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/tremendous/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-15: Verify the supported delivery methods
Since the PR objectives mention email rewards specifically, let's verify if all these delivery methods are supported by the Tremendous API.
components/tremendous/actions/create-order-email-reward/create-order-email-reward.mjs (1)
1-9: LGTM! Component metadata and imports are well structured.
The component follows Pipedream's best practices with proper documentation links and versioning.
components/tremendous/tremendous.app.mjs (1)
63-86: Verify API endpoint URLs for correctness
Ensure that the API endpoint URLs used in the methods createOrder, listCampaigns, listProducts, and listFundingSources are accurate according to the Tremendous API documentation.
You might want to double-check that the endpoints (/orders, /campaigns, /products, /funding_sources) are correct and correspond to the latest API specifications.
| export const DELIVERY_METHOD_OPTIONS = [ | ||
| { | ||
| value: "EMAIL", | ||
| label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by email", | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| value: "LINK", | ||
| label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient via a link.", | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| { | ||
| value: "PHONE", | ||
| label: "Deliver the reward to the recipient by SMS", | ||
| }, | ||
| ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding JSDoc type definitions
Adding type definitions would improve IDE support and make the code more maintainable.
Add this before the constant definition:
/**
* @typedef {Object} DeliveryMethodOption
* @property {('EMAIL'|'LINK'|'SMS')} value - The delivery method identifier
* @property {string} label - Human-readable description of the delivery method
*/
/** @type {DeliveryMethodOption[]} */| campaignId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "campaignId", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| products: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "products", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add runtime validation for campaign/products requirement.
While the info box alerts users that either Products or Campaign ID must be specified, there's no runtime validation enforcing this requirement. This could lead to invalid API calls.
Add validation in the run method:
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.campaignId && !this.products) {
+ throw new Error("Either Campaign ID or Products must be specified");
+ }
const response = await this.app.createOrder({Also applies to: 26-30
| recipientPhone: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Recipient Phone", | ||
| description: "Phone number of the recipient. For non-US phone numbers, specify the country code (prefixed with `+`).", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance phone number validation.
While the description specifies the format for international phone numbers, there's no validation to ensure compliance.
Add validation for phone numbers:
recipientPhone: {
type: "string",
label: "Recipient Phone",
description: "Phone number of the recipient. For non-US phone numbers, specify the country code (prefixed with `+`).",
+ validate: (value) => {
+ if (!/^\+?[1-9]\d{1,14}$/.test(value)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid phone number format. Use E.164 format (e.g., +1234567890)");
+ }
+ },
optional: true,
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| recipientPhone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Recipient Phone", | |
| description: "Phone number of the recipient. For non-US phone numbers, specify the country code (prefixed with `+`).", | |
| }, | |
| recipientPhone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Recipient Phone", | |
| description: "Phone number of the recipient. For non-US phone numbers, specify the country code (prefixed with `+`).", | |
| validate: (value) => { | |
| if (!/^\+?[1-9]\d{1,14}$/.test(value)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid phone number format. Use E.164 format (e.g., +1234567890)"); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, |
| valueAmount: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Value Amount", | ||
| description: "Amount of the reward.", | ||
| }, | ||
| valueCurrencyCode: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Value Currency Code", | ||
| description: "Currency of the reward.", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for value amount and currency code.
The valueAmount and valueCurrencyCode fields lack format validation:
- Amount should be a valid numeric string
- Currency code should follow ISO 4217 format (e.g., USD, EUR)
Add validation:
valueAmount: {
type: "string",
label: "Value Amount",
description: "Amount of the reward.",
+ validate: (value) => {
+ if (!/^\d+(\.\d{1,2})?$/.test(value)) {
+ throw new Error("Value amount must be a valid number with up to 2 decimal places");
+ }
+ },
},
valueCurrencyCode: {
type: "string",
label: "Value Currency Code",
description: "Currency of the reward.",
+ validate: (value) => {
+ if (!/^[A-Z]{3}$/.test(value)) {
+ throw new Error("Currency code must be a 3-letter ISO 4217 code (e.g., USD)");
+ }
+ },
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| valueAmount: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Value Amount", | |
| description: "Amount of the reward.", | |
| }, | |
| valueCurrencyCode: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Value Currency Code", | |
| description: "Currency of the reward.", | |
| }, | |
| valueAmount: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Value Amount", | |
| description: "Amount of the reward.", | |
| validate: (value) => { | |
| if (!/^\d+(\.\d{1,2})?$/.test(value)) { | |
| throw new Error("Value amount must be a valid number with up to 2 decimal places"); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| valueCurrencyCode: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Value Currency Code", | |
| description: "Currency of the reward.", | |
| validate: (value) => { | |
| if (!/^[A-Z]{3}$/.test(value)) { | |
| throw new Error("Currency code must be a 3-letter ISO 4217 code (e.g., USD)"); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| }, |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createOrder({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| external_id: this.externalId, | ||
| payment: { | ||
| funding_source_id: this.fundingSourceId, | ||
| }, | ||
| reward: { | ||
| campaign_id: this.campaignId, | ||
| products: this.products, | ||
| value: { | ||
| denomination: this.valueAmount, | ||
| currency_code: this.valueCurrencyCode, | ||
| }, | ||
| recipient: { | ||
| name: this.recipientName, | ||
| email: this.recipientEmail, | ||
| phone: this.recipientPhone, | ||
| }, | ||
| delivery: { | ||
| method: this.deliveryMethod, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created order (ID: ${response?.order?.id})`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling and response validation.
The current implementation has several potential issues:
- No explicit error handling for API failures
- No validation of the response structure
- Unsafe optional chaining in summary message
Implement proper error handling and validation:
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.campaignId && !this.products) {
+ throw new Error("Either Campaign ID or Products must be specified");
+ }
+
const response = await this.app.createOrder({
$,
data: {
external_id: this.externalId,
payment: {
funding_source_id: this.fundingSourceId,
},
reward: {
campaign_id: this.campaignId,
products: this.products,
value: {
denomination: this.valueAmount,
currency_code: this.valueCurrencyCode,
},
recipient: {
name: this.recipientName,
email: this.recipientEmail,
phone: this.recipientPhone,
},
delivery: {
method: this.deliveryMethod,
},
},
},
});
+ if (!response?.order?.id) {
+ throw new Error("Failed to create order: Invalid response structure");
+ }
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully created order (ID: ${response?.order?.id})`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully created order (ID: ${response.order.id})`);
return response;
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.createOrder({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| external_id: this.externalId, | |
| payment: { | |
| funding_source_id: this.fundingSourceId, | |
| }, | |
| reward: { | |
| campaign_id: this.campaignId, | |
| products: this.products, | |
| value: { | |
| denomination: this.valueAmount, | |
| currency_code: this.valueCurrencyCode, | |
| }, | |
| recipient: { | |
| name: this.recipientName, | |
| email: this.recipientEmail, | |
| phone: this.recipientPhone, | |
| }, | |
| delivery: { | |
| method: this.deliveryMethod, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created order (ID: ${response?.order?.id})`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| if (!this.campaignId && !this.products) { | |
| throw new Error("Either Campaign ID or Products must be specified"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.app.createOrder({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| external_id: this.externalId, | |
| payment: { | |
| funding_source_id: this.fundingSourceId, | |
| }, | |
| reward: { | |
| campaign_id: this.campaignId, | |
| products: this.products, | |
| value: { | |
| denomination: this.valueAmount, | |
| currency_code: this.valueCurrencyCode, | |
| }, | |
| recipient: { | |
| name: this.recipientName, | |
| email: this.recipientEmail, | |
| phone: this.recipientPhone, | |
| }, | |
| delivery: { | |
| method: this.deliveryMethod, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.order?.id) { | |
| throw new Error("Failed to create order: Invalid response structure"); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created order (ID: ${response.order.id})`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, |
| description: "Create an order to send out a reward. [See the documentation](https://developers.tremendous.com/reference/create-order)", | ||
| type: "action", | ||
| props: { | ||
| app, | ||
| campaignId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "campaignId", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| products: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "products", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| infoBox: { | ||
| type: "alert", | ||
| alertType: "info", | ||
| content: "Either `Products` or `Campaign ID` must be specified. [See the documentation](https://developers.tremendous.com/reference/create-order) for more information.", | ||
| }, | ||
| fundingSourceId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "fundingSourceId", | ||
| ], | ||
| default: "balance", | ||
| }, | ||
| externalId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "External ID", | ||
| description: "Reference for this order. If set, any subsequent requests with the same `External ID` will not create any further orders, and simply return the initially created order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| valueAmount: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Value Amount", | ||
| description: "Amount of the reward.", | ||
| }, | ||
| valueCurrencyCode: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Value Currency Code", | ||
| description: "Currency of the reward.", | ||
| }, | ||
| recipientName: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Recipient Name", | ||
| description: "Name of the recipient.", | ||
| }, | ||
| recipientEmail: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Recipient Email", | ||
| description: "Email address of the recipient.", | ||
| }, | ||
| recipientPhone: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Recipient Phone", | ||
| description: "Phone number of the recipient. For non-US phone numbers, specify the country code (prefixed with `+`).", | ||
| }, | ||
| deliveryMethod: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Delivery Method", | ||
| description: "How to deliver the reward to the recipient.", | ||
| options: DELIVERY_METHOD_OPTIONS, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createOrder({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| external_id: this.externalId, | ||
| payment: { | ||
| funding_source_id: this.fundingSourceId, | ||
| }, | ||
| reward: { | ||
| campaign_id: this.campaignId, | ||
| products: this.products, | ||
| value: { | ||
| denomination: this.valueAmount, | ||
| currency_code: this.valueCurrencyCode, | ||
| }, | ||
| recipient: { | ||
| name: this.recipientName, | ||
| email: this.recipientEmail, | ||
| phone: this.recipientPhone, | ||
| }, | ||
| delivery: { | ||
| method: this.deliveryMethod, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created order (ID: ${response?.order?.id})`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide the final response:
PII handling is secure, but rate limiting needs attention
The code review reveals:
- PII (email, phone) is properly handled and not explicitly logged. The platform's axios implementation only logs debug information when explicitly requested.
- However, there's no rate limit handling implemented in either the Tremendous app or the platform's axios client.
Action items:
- Implement rate limit handling in the Tremendous app to prevent API quota exhaustion
- Consider adding exponential backoff for failed requests
- Add proper error handling for 429 (Too Many Requests) responses
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify API rate limits and PII handling.
Since this component handles sensitive information (email, phone) and makes external API calls, please ensure:
- API rate limits are properly handled
- PII is not logged in debug messages
Let's check the app file for rate limit handling:
Let me gather more information about rate limiting and PII handling in the Tremendous app specifically:
Let me check the platform's axios implementation since it's being used for the HTTP client:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if rate limiting is implemented in the app file
rg -i "rate.?limit" --type js
# Check for any debug logging of sensitive data
rg -i "console.log|debug" --type js
Length of output: 2773
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Tremendous app file for error handling and API calls
rg -A 5 "createOrder|handleError" components/tremendous/
# Check for any HTTP client configuration
cat components/tremendous/tremendous.app.mjs
Length of output: 3697
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check platform's axios implementation for rate limiting and error handling
cat platform/dist/axios.js
Length of output: 6359
| async options() { | ||
| const { campaigns } = await this.listCampaigns(); | ||
| return campaigns?.map(({ | ||
| id, name, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label: name, | ||
| value: id, | ||
| })); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor options methods to reduce duplication
The options methods for campaignId, products, and fundingSourceId have similar implementations. Consider refactoring them into a reusable helper function to improve maintainability.
Here's an example of how you might implement a helper method:
async fetchOptions(fetchMethod, dataKey, labelKey, valueKey) {
const response = await fetchMethod();
const data = response[dataKey];
return data?.map((item) => ({
label: item[labelKey],
value: item[valueKey],
}));
}Update your options methods:
-async options() {
- const { campaigns } = await this.listCampaigns();
- return campaigns?.map(({ id, name }) => ({
- label: name,
- value: id,
- }));
-},
+options() {
+ return this.fetchOptions(
+ this.listCampaigns.bind(this),
+ "campaigns",
+ "name",
+ "id"
+ );
+},Apply similar changes to the products and fundingSourceId options methods.
Also applies to: 25-33, 39-47
| _baseRequest({ | ||
| $, headers, ...args | ||
| }) { | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| ...headers, | ||
| Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| baseURL: "https://testflight.tremendous.com/api/v2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider making the baseURL configurable for environment flexibility
The baseURL in the _baseRequest method is hardcoded to the test environment "https://testflight.tremendous.com/api/v2". This may not be suitable for production environments. Consider making the baseURL configurable to switch between test and production environments.
You can modify the code to use a configurable baseURL:
return axios($, {
headers: {
...headers,
Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`,
},
- baseURL: "https://testflight.tremendous.com/api/v2",
+ baseURL: this.$auth.baseURL || "https://testflight.tremendous.com/api/v2",
...args,
});And update your authentication configuration to include baseURL as needed.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _baseRequest({ | |
| $, headers, ...args | |
| }) { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, | |
| }, | |
| baseURL: "https://testflight.tremendous.com/api/v2", | |
| _baseRequest({ | |
| $, headers, ...args | |
| }) { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`, | |
| }, | |
| baseURL: this.$auth.baseURL || "https://testflight.tremendous.com/api/v2", |
|
/approve |
* App and package updates * pnpm * Create Order action * Prop definitions and requests * Type adjustment * Import fix * Adding and adjusting several props
Closes #13235
Note: I was not able to fully validate this due to the requirement of booking a demo and no free usage being readily available. I've validated that the component and async props follow the documented API structure.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
@pipedream/tremendouscreated with relevant metadata for better organization and searchability.These updates improve user experience by streamlining reward creation and enhancing the app's capabilities.