Loops.so new components #14226
Loops.so new components #14226
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/loops_so/actions/list-mailing-lists/list-mailing-lists.mjs (2)
3-8: LGTM: Action definition is well-structured.The action definition follows the expected format and includes all necessary fields. The key, name, and type are appropriate for the action's purpose. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is excellent.
Consider expanding the description to provide more context about what mailing lists are in the context of Loops.so and how this action might be used in a workflow.
12-20: LGTM: Run method is well-implemented with room for improvement.The run method is correctly implemented as an async function and properly uses the 'loops' object to call the API. The summary export provides useful feedback to the user, and returning the response allows for further processing in the workflow.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling to catch and handle potential API errors gracefully.
- Validate the response before returning it to ensure it matches the expected format.
Here's a suggested implementation:
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.loops.listMailingLists({ $, }); if (!Array.isArray(response)) { throw new Error('Unexpected response format'); } $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.length} mailing lists`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve mailing lists: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }components/loops_so/actions/list-custom-fields/list-custom-fields.mjs (3)
3-11: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is comprehensive and follows Pipedream conventions. The key, name, description, type, and props are all correctly defined. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is particularly helpful.
For future updates, consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0") for the initial public release, which allows for better version management as the component evolves.
12-20: LGTM: Run method implementation is solid.The run method is well-implemented, making proper use of async/await and the
$object for API interactions. The summary export provides useful feedback, and returning the full response allows for flexible use of the retrieved data.Consider adding error handling to improve robustness:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.loops.listCustomFields({ $, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.length} custom fields`); return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", "Failed to retrieve custom fields"); + throw error; + } },This change will provide more informative feedback to users in case of API errors.
1-21: Great job implementing the List Custom Fields action!This new action aligns well with the PR objectives and addresses part of the functionality requested in issue #14081. The implementation is concise, follows Pipedream's component structure, and provides the ability to list custom fields for Loops.so.
As you continue to implement other actions mentioned in the issue (such as creating, updating, and deleting contacts, listing mailing lists, sending events, and sending emails), consider maintaining a consistent structure across all new components. This will enhance maintainability and make it easier for users to work with the Loops.so integration in Pipedream.
components/loops_so/loops_so.app.mjs (3)
88-94: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for consistency.The
deleteContactmethod is well-implemented and follows the existing patterns in the file. It correctly uses the_makeRequestmethod and sets the appropriate HTTP method and endpoint.For consistency with other methods in this file, consider adding a brief comment describing the purpose of this method, like so:
+ // Delete a contact deleteContact(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/contacts/delete", method: "POST", ...args, }); },
115-120: LGTM! Consider adding a comment and explicitly setting the HTTP method.The
listMailingListsmethod is well-implemented and follows the existing patterns in the file. It correctly uses the_makeRequestmethod and sets the appropriate endpoint.For consistency and clarity, consider making the following improvements:
- Add a brief comment describing the purpose of this method.
- Explicitly set the HTTP method to GET, even though it's the default.
Here's the suggested change:
+ // List all mailing lists listMailingLists(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/lists", + method: "GET", ...args, }); },These changes will make the method more consistent with others in the file and improve readability.
Line range hint
88-120: Great progress on expanding Loops.so integration!The new
deleteContactandlistMailingListsmethods are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives. They follow the existing code structure and style, making them seamless additions to the Loops.so app module.To fully address the requirements mentioned in issue #14081, consider implementing the following methods in future updates:
updateContact(already implemented)findContact(already implemented)sendEvent(already implemented)sendEmail(similar tosendTransactionalEmail, might need adjustment)listCustomFields(already implemented)The only remaining action from the issue that hasn't been addressed is "list mailing lists," which you've just implemented with
listMailingLists.Great job on making significant progress towards enhancing the Loops.so integration within Pipedream!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- components/loops_so/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/find-contact/find-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/list-custom-fields/list-custom-fields.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/list-mailing-lists/list-mailing-lists.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/send-event/send-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/send-transactional-email/send-transactional-email.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/loops_so/loops_so.app.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/loops_so/package.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- components/loops_so/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs
- components/loops_so/actions/find-contact/find-contact.mjs
- components/loops_so/actions/send-event/send-event.mjs
- components/loops_so/actions/send-transactional-email/send-transactional-email.mjs
- components/loops_so/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs
- components/loops_so/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/loops_so/actions/list-mailing-lists/list-mailing-lists.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the 'loops' object from the main app file, which is expected to contain the core API integration logic for Loops.so.
9-11: LGTM: Props are correctly defined.The 'loops' prop is properly defined, referencing the imported 'loops' object. This follows the expected pattern for Pipedream actions and will allow the action to access the app's methods.
components/loops_so/actions/list-custom-fields/list-custom-fields.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
loopsobject from the relative path. This follows best practices and ensures the necessary dependencies are available for the action.components/loops_so/actions/delete-contact/delete-contact.mjs (1)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and action metadata are well-defined.The imports, action key, name, description, and version are appropriately set. The inclusion of the API documentation link is helpful for users.
components/loops_so/actions/send-transactional-email/send-transactional-email.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…sactional-email.mjs Co-authored-by: michelle0927 <[email protected]>
Closes #14081
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Updates
These enhancements improve user interaction with contact management and streamline the functionality of the Loops application.