New Components - nile_database #14223
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughA new module for creating users and executing custom PostgreSQL queries has been added to the Nile database application. The "Create User" module allows for user creation with specified properties, while the "Execute Query" module enables users to run SQL queries and receive results. Additionally, several methods have been introduced to enhance database interactions, including user management and API request handling. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM with a minor suggestion for the description.The import statement and action metadata look good. The description provides useful information and a link to the documentation.
Consider adding a brief mention of the Nile database in the description for more context. For example:
- description: "Execute a custom PostgreSQL query. See [our docs](https://pipedream.com/docs/databases/working-with-sql) to learn more about working with SQL in Pipedream.", + description: "Execute a custom PostgreSQL query on the Nile database. See [our docs](https://pipedream.com/docs/databases/working-with-sql) to learn more about working with SQL in Pipedream.",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/nile_database/package.json (3)
3-3: Version bump reflects new featuresThe version update from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 appropriately reflects the addition of new features, specifically the Execute Query action mentioned in the PR objectives.
12-14: PublishConfig ensures public accessThe 'access' property set to 'public' in the publishConfig section is appropriate for an open-source project like Pipedream. This ensures that the package can be published and accessed publicly.
15-17: New dependency added for PostgreSQL interactionsThe addition of the 'pg' package (PostgreSQL client for Node.js) is consistent with the new Execute Query functionality. This dependency will enable PostgreSQL database interactions.
To ensure the 'pg' package is being utilized in the codebase, let's run the following script:
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (1)
1-28: Consider adding input validation and security measures.The overall implementation of the "Execute Query" action looks good. However, given that this action allows execution of custom SQL queries, it's important to consider potential security implications.
Consider implementing the following security measures:
Input validation: Add a validation step to ensure that the SQL query doesn't contain potentially harmful operations (e.g., DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, etc.).
Query limitations: Implement restrictions on the types of queries that can be executed (e.g., only allow SELECT statements).
Resource limits: Add timeouts and result size limits to prevent resource exhaustion.
Logging: Implement comprehensive logging of executed queries for auditing purposes.
Here's a basic example of how you might implement some of these suggestions:
import { parse } from 'pgsql-ast-parser'; // ... existing code ... async run({ $ }) { try { // Validate and sanitize the SQL query const ast = parse(this.sql); if (ast.some(stmt => stmt.type !== 'select')) { throw new Error('Only SELECT statements are allowed'); } const args = this.nile.executeQueryAdapter(this.sql); // Add timeout to query execution const timeoutPromise = new Promise((_, reject) => setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Query execution timed out')), 30000) ); const queryPromise = this.nile.executeQuery(args); const data = await Promise.race([queryPromise, timeoutPromise]); // Limit result size if (data.length > 1000) { throw new Error('Query returned too many rows. Please limit your result set.'); } // Log the executed query (consider redacting sensitive information) console.log(`Executed query: ${this.sql}`); const redactedSQL = this.sql.replace(/\b(password|secret|key)\b\s*=\s*['"]?[^\s'"]+['"]?/gi, '$1=*****'); $.export("$summary", `Executed query: ${redactedSQL}. Returned ${data.length} ${data.length === 1 ? "row" : "rows"}`); return data; } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to execute query: ${error.message}`); } }, // ... rest of the code ...Note that this is a basic implementation and you may need to adjust it based on your specific security requirements and the capabilities of the
nileobject.To ensure that these security measures are properly implemented across the codebase, you can run the following verification script:
This script will help identify potential security issues and ensure that the suggested measures are consistently applied across the codebase.
components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (3)
81-84: Verify compatibility of the nullish coalescing assignment (??=) operatorIn the
getSchema()method, the nullish coalescing assignment operator (??=) is used:acc[row.tableName] ??= { metadata: {}, schema: {}, };This operator is supported in Node.js 15 and above. If your runtime environment includes older versions of Node.js, this could cause a syntax error.
If compatibility with older Node.js versions is required, consider using an alternative:
if (!acc[row.tableName]) { acc[row.tableName] = { metadata: {}, schema: {}, }; }
65-89: Ensure the SQL query ingetSchemaretrieves the intended schemasIn the
getSchema()method, the SQL query filters out certain schemas:WHERE table_schema NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema', 'users', 'auth')
Confirm that excluding the 'users' and 'auth' schemas is intentional. These schemas might contain important tables for authentication and user management that you may want to include.
Ensure that all necessary schemas are included. If there are custom schemas or additional system schemas that should be excluded or included, adjust the
WHEREclause accordingly.
1-92: Overall, the code changes enhance database interaction capabilitiesThe addition of methods for configuration, query execution, and schema retrieval significantly improves the application's functionality. Proper exception handling and the use of
async/awaitensure robust database operations.
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
michelle0927
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
components/nile_database/sources/new-user-created/new-user-created.mjs (3)
3-10: LGTM: Well-structured component definition. Consider adding documentation.The exported object is well-structured and includes all necessary metadata for a Pipedream source component. The use of spreading from the common object promotes code reuse.
Consider adding a brief comment above the export to describe the purpose of this component, which could help with maintainability.
13-15: LGTM: getResourceFn implementation. Consider error handling.The
getResourceFnmethod correctly returns thelistUsersfunction from the Nile database context.Consider adding error handling in case
this.nileorthis.nile.listUsersis undefined:getResourceFn() { if (!this.nile || typeof this.nile.listUsers !== 'function') { throw new Error('Nile database or listUsers function is not properly initialized'); } return this.nile.listUsers; },
16-22: LGTM: generateMeta implementation. Consider input validation.The
generateMetamethod correctly constructs a metadata object from the user data.Consider adding input validation to ensure the user object has the required properties:
generateMeta(user) { if (!user || typeof user !== 'object' || !user.id || !user.created) { throw new Error('Invalid user object'); } return { id: user.id, summary: `New User ID: ${user.id}`, ts: Date.parse(user.created), }; },components/nile_database/sources/new-tenant-created/new-tenant-created.mjs (2)
3-10: LGTM: Well-structured component definition.The main object is correctly defined and extends the common base module. The properties provide clear information about the component. Consider adding more details to the description, such as mentioning the specific use case or any important considerations for users implementing this component.
11-23: LGTM: Well-implemented methods with room for improvement.The methods are correctly defined and serve their intended purposes. The
generateMetamethod creates a comprehensive metadata object for each new tenant event.Consider adding error handling in the
getResourceFnmethod to gracefully handle potential issues with accessingthis.nile.listTenants. This could improve the robustness of the component.Here's a suggested improvement for the
getResourceFnmethod:getResourceFn() { if (!this.nile || typeof this.nile.listTenants !== 'function') { throw new Error('Unable to access listTenants function from Nile database context'); } return this.nile.listTenants; },components/nile_database/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (3)
3-8: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is comprehensive and follows a consistent format. The description provides useful context and includes a link to the API documentation, which is helpful for users.
Consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0") for future releases to better indicate the nature of changes in the component.
9-39: LGTM: Props are well-defined, but consider enhancing password security.The props definition is comprehensive and includes all necessary fields for user creation. The use of propDefinitions for workspace and database promotes reusability.
Consider enhancing the security of the password prop:
- Add a
secret: trueproperty to prevent the password from being displayed in logs or UI.- Implement password strength requirements using a regex pattern or custom validation logic.
Example implementation:
password: { type: "string", label: "Password", description: "Password for the user (must be at least 8 characters long and include a number and a special character)", secret: true, pattern: "^(?=.*[A-Za-z])(?=.*\\d)(?=.*[@$!%*#?&])[A-Za-z\\d@$!%*#?&]{8,}$", },
40-53: LGTM: Run method implementation is correct, but consider adding error handling.The run method correctly implements the user creation logic using the provided nile.createUser method. The use of $.export for the summary message is good for providing user feedback.
Consider adding error handling to improve robustness:
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.nile.createUser({ $, workspace: this.workspace, database: this.database, data: { email: this.email, password: this.password, preferredName: this.preferredName, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created user with ID: ${response.id}`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create user: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }This will provide more informative error messages and ensure that errors are properly propagated.
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (1)
9-42: Props are well-defined, but consider adding query validation.The props are correctly structured and include all necessary parameters for database connection and query execution. The use of
propDefinitionfor the 'database' prop is a good practice.However, to enhance security, consider adding validation or sanitization for the 'query' prop to prevent potential SQL injection attacks.
You could add a custom validation function to the 'query' prop:
query: { type: "string", label: "Query", description: "The PostgreSQL query to execute", validate: (value) => { // Basic validation example - adjust as needed if (!/^SELECT/i.test(value)) { throw new Error("Only SELECT queries are allowed for security reasons."); } }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/nile_database/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/nile_database/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/sources/new-tenant-created/new-tenant-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/sources/new-user-created/new-user-created.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/nile_database/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/nile_database/sources/new-user-created/new-user-created.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is appropriate.The import of the common base module is correct and follows good practices for code reuse.
components/nile_database/sources/new-tenant-created/new-tenant-created.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and follows best practices.The import of the common base module promotes code reuse and maintainability.
1-24: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor improvement opportunities.This new component for handling new tenant creation events in Nile Database is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. It extends the common base module effectively and implements the necessary methods for event handling.
Key strengths:
- Clear and concise component definition
- Proper use of the common base module
- Well-implemented methods for resource access and metadata generation
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding more details to the component description
- Implement error handling in the
getResourceFnmethodThe component is ready for use, and these minor enhancements would further improve its robustness and usability.
components/nile_database/actions/create-user/create-user.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly references the nile_database.app.mjs file using a relative path. The use of the .mjs extension is appropriate for ECMAScript modules.
1-54: Overall assessment: Well-implemented "Create User" action with minor improvement opportunities.The "Create User" action for the Nile database is well-structured and correctly implemented. It provides a clear interface for creating users with necessary properties and integrates well with the Nile database app.
Key strengths:
- Clear and descriptive metadata
- Well-defined props with reusable definitions
- Straightforward implementation of the run method
Suggested improvements:
- Enhance password security measures
- Implement error handling in the run method
- Consider using semantic versioning for future releases
These enhancements will further improve the robustness and security of the component.
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (3)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata are well-defined.The import statement and action metadata are correctly structured. The description accurately reflects the purpose of the action, and the version number is appropriate for a new component.
43-45: LGTM: Run method structure is correct.The run method is properly defined as an async function, and the config object is correctly constructed using the prop values. The use of destructuring for the $ object follows Pipedream conventions.
1-57: Overall, the implementation is solid with room for enhancement.The "Execute Query" action for the Nile database is well-structured and implements the necessary functionality. The code is clean, readable, and follows Pipedream conventions.
Key strengths:
- Clear and concise action metadata
- Well-defined props covering all necessary parameters
- Correct use of async/await for database operations
Suggested improvements:
- Implement query validation to enhance security
- Add comprehensive error handling
- Improve the summary export with more details
- Implement basic validation of the returned data
By addressing these points, you'll significantly enhance the robustness and security of this action. Great job on the initial implementation!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1)
7-26: LGTM with suggestion: Consider adding error handling to propDefinitions options.The propDefinitions for "workspace" and "database" are well-structured with clear labels and descriptions. The use of async options to fetch values dynamically is a good practice. However, consider adding error handling to the async options to gracefully handle potential API failures.
Example for the workspace option:
async options() { try { const { workspaces } = await this.getAuthenticatedUser(); return workspaces?.map(({ slug }) => slug) || []; } catch (error) { console.error("Error fetching workspaces:", error); return []; } },Apply similar error handling to the database option as well.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/nile_database/actions/execute-query/execute-query.mjs (4)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.The import statement and action metadata are well-structured and provide clear information about the component. The version "0.0.1" is appropriate for a new component.
9-38: LGTM: Props definition is comprehensive and well-documented.The props cover all necessary inputs for executing a query, with clear and informative descriptions. Previous review comments about the typo in the SQL query label and the eslint-disable comment have been addressed.
39-49: LGTM: Run method initialization is well-structured.The async run method is correctly implemented, creating a comprehensive config object with user credentials and dynamically retrieved connection details. This approach provides flexibility and follows good practices for database operations.
1-56: Overall, the implementation is solid with room for minor improvements.The "Execute Query" action is well-structured and covers the basic functionality required. It follows the expected format for a Pipedream action and includes all necessary parts. The suggested improvements in error handling, summary export, and data validation will enhance its robustness and user-friendliness.
Great job on implementing this new component! Once the suggested improvements are incorporated, this will be a valuable addition to the Nile database integration.
components/nile_database/nile_database.app.mjs (4)
1-6: LGTM: Imports and app declaration are correct.The imports for
axiosandpgare appropriate for the app's functionality, and the app declaration follows the expected format.
127-134: LGTM: Proper handling of database client in executeQuery.The
executeQuerymethod correctly uses a try-finally block to ensure the client is released, even if an error occurs. This is a good practice for managing database connections.
1-137: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvements.The
nile_database.app.mjsfile provides a solid foundation for interacting with the Nile database API and executing queries. The code is generally well-structured and follows consistent patterns. However, there are several areas where improvements can be made:
- Error handling in propDefinitions
- Correct usage of axios in the app context
- More robust URL parsing
- Reduction of code duplication in API methods
- Implementation of connection pooling for better database performance
Addressing these points will enhance the reliability, efficiency, and maintainability of the application. Great work overall, and these suggested improvements will further strengthen the implementation.
41-60:⚠️ Potential issueFix: Correct the use of
$in_makeRequest.In an app file, the
$context is not available. Replaceaxios($, ...)withthis._axios(...)to use the built-in axios method for app files.async _makeRequest({ - $ = this, workspace, database, url, path, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { + return this._axios({ url: url || `${await this._getBaseUrl({ workspace, database, - $, })}${path}`, headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, }, ...opts, }); },This change ensures that HTTP requests are correctly handled within the app file's context.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Resolves #14154
Resolves #14222
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores