New Components - vida #14143
New Components - vida #14143
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new functionalities to the VIDA application, including an action for adding context to conversations, a webhook management component, and new source modules for handling incoming and outgoing conversation events. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Incoming Conversation (Instant) - New Conversation (Instant) Actions - Provide Context
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
components/vida/sources/new-conversation-instant/new-conversation-instant.mjs (1)
12-17: Consider enhancing thegetSummarymethod.The
getSummarymethod provides a basic summary string for new conversation events. While it's functional, it could be more informative.Consider expanding the summary to include more relevant information about the conversation, if available. For example:
getSummary(event) { return `New conversation created: ${event.uuid}${event.agentName ? ` with agent ${event.agentName}` : ''}${event.channel ? ` via ${event.channel}` : ''}`; },This would provide more context about the conversation at a glance.
components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/new-incoming-conversation-instant.mjs (1)
12-20: LGTM: Custom methods implement required functionality.The
getSummaryandfilterEventsmethods correctly implement the functionality required for the new-incoming-conversation-instant webhook source. They extend the common methods appropriately.Consider adding a brief comment above each method to explain its purpose, especially for the
filterEventsmethod. This would enhance code readability. For example:// Filter events to only include inbound communications filterEvents(body) { return body.direction === "inbound"; },components/vida/actions/provide-context/provide-context.mjs (2)
9-21: Props are well-defined, consider adding phone number validation.The props are correctly defined and align with the PR objectives. The descriptions are clear and informative.
Consider adding validation for the E.164 format of phone numbers in the
targetprop. This could help prevent errors caused by incorrectly formatted phone numbers. You could implement this using a regular expression pattern or a custom validation function.Example implementation:
target: { type: "string", label: "Target", description: "Phone number in E.164 format or VIDA username of the user.", pattern: "^\\+[1-9]\\d{1,14}$|^[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$", patternError: "Please enter a valid E.164 phone number or VIDA username.", },
22-32: Run method looks good, consider adding error handling.The
runmethod implementation correctly uses thevida.addContextmethod and exports a summary message upon successful execution.Consider adding error handling to improve the robustness of the action. This will help provide more informative feedback if the API call fails. Here's an example of how you could implement this:
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.vida.addContext({ $, data: { target: this.target, context: this.context, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully uploaded additional context for target ${this.target}`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to upload context: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }components/vida/vida.app.mjs (5)
10-15: LGTM: Parameters method added with a suggestionThe
_paramsmethod is well-implemented, adding the API token to the request parameters.Consider using a more secure method to pass the API token, such as including it in the request headers instead of query parameters. This can be done by modifying the
_makeRequestmethod to include headers.
16-24: LGTM: Request method added with a suggestion for improvementThe
_makeRequestmethod is well-structured and provides a flexible way to make API requests. It effectively combines the base URL, path, and parameters.Consider adding error handling to this method. You could wrap the axios call in a try-catch block and provide more informative error messages. For example:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, params, ...opts }) { return axios($, { url: this._baseUrl() + path, params: this._params(params), ...opts, }).catch(err => { throw new Error(`Request failed: ${err.message}`); }); }This will provide more context if an API request fails.
25-31: LGTM: Context addition method implementedThe
addContextmethod correctly implements the "provide-context" action mentioned in the PR objectives. It uses the_makeRequestmethod to send a POST request to the "/context" endpoint.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the purpose of this method and the structure of the
optsparameter. For example:/** * Adds context to a conversation with the AI agent. * @param {Object} opts - Options for the request * @param {string} opts.aiAgentIdentity - The identity of the AI agent * @param {string} opts.additionalContext - The additional context to be added * @returns {Promise<Object>} The response from the API */ addContext(opts = {}) { // ... existing code ... }This will improve the usability and maintainability of the code.
32-38: LGTM: Webhook creation method implementedThe
createWebhookmethod correctly implements the webhook creation functionality mentioned in the PR objectives. It uses the_makeRequestmethod to send a POST request to the "/webhooks" endpoint.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the purpose of this method and the structure of the
optsparameter. For example:/** * Creates a new webhook. * @param {Object} opts - Options for the webhook creation * @param {string} opts.type - The type of webhook (e.g., 'new-incoming-conversation-instant', 'new-conversation-instant') * @param {string} opts.url - The URL to which the webhook will send data * @returns {Promise<Object>} The response from the API */ createWebhook(opts = {}) { // ... existing code ... }This documentation will help users understand how to use the method correctly.
39-44: LGTM: Webhook deletion method implementedThe
deleteWebhookmethod correctly implements the functionality to delete a webhook. It uses the_makeRequestmethod to send a DELETE request to the "/webhooks" endpoint.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the purpose of this method and the structure of the
optsparameter. For example:/** * Deletes an existing webhook. * @param {Object} opts - Options for the webhook deletion * @param {string} opts.webhookId - The ID of the webhook to be deleted * @returns {Promise<Object>} The response from the API */ deleteWebhook(opts = {}) { // ... existing code ... }This documentation will help users understand how to use the method correctly.
components/vida/sources/common/base.mjs (3)
1-16: LGTM! Consider enhancing the 'label' prop.The import statement and props section are well-structured and appropriate for the component's functionality. The use of custom types and services is commendable.
Consider adding a default value for the 'label' prop to improve user experience. For example:
label: { type: "string", label: "Label", description: "Friendly label for webhook", + optional: true, + default: "Vida Webhook", },
17-21: Add a comment explaining the filterEvent method.The
filterEventmethod currently always returns true, which means it doesn't filter any events. This might be intentional if it's meant to be overridden by child components, but it's not immediately clear from the code.Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose and expected usage of this method:
methods: { + /** + * Filter incoming events. Override this method in child components to implement specific filtering logic. + * @param {Object} event - The event to be filtered + * @returns {boolean} - Return true to emit the event, false to filter it out + */ filterEvent() { return true; }, },
22-39: LGTM! Consider parameterizing the webhook type.The hooks section properly implements lifecycle methods for creating and deleting webhooks using the Vida API. This is good practice for managing component resources.
To improve flexibility, consider parameterizing the webhook type instead of hardcoding it as "conversation". This would allow the component to be used for different types of webhooks. For example:
props: { // ... other props + webhookType: { + type: "string", + label: "Webhook Type", + description: "Type of the webhook to create", + default: "conversation", + }, }, hooks: { async activate() { await this.vida.createWebhook({ data: { url: this.http.endpoint, label: this.label, - type: "conversation", + type: this.webhookType, }, }); }, // ... deactivate method },components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
24-37: Call-specific properties look good, minor suggestion for clarityThe call-specific properties in this section are well-structured and align perfectly with the requirements for the new-incoming-conversation-instant webhook mentioned in the PR objectives. They provide comprehensive information about the call, including its source, type, duration, direction, and various flags.
For improved clarity, consider grouping related properties together. For example:
"source": "call", "type": "call", + "direction": "inbound", "uuid": "86547d26-9b89-41a6-afd1-292085c9b846", "campaignId": "campa861346f6104e3e4762ef5b936e2984fb", "fromNumber": "+1234567890", "toNumber": "integrations", "notify": false, "targetInbox": "inbox", - "type": "call", "duration": 1, - "direction": "inbound", "missedCall": false, "bypassAgent": false, "cnamSpam": false, "selfCall": true,This grouping makes it easier to understand related properties at a glance.
components/vida/sources/new-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
2-5: Review basic call information propertiesThe basic call information properties are comprehensive, but there are a few points to consider:
- The
fromandtofields use different formats (number vs string). Consider standardizing these for consistency.- The
timestamp(1727728969) corresponds to September 30, 2024, which is in the future. For testing purposes, it's generally better to use a past or present date.- The
fromNumberis a string ("+1234567890"), whilefromis a number (999999999999). Consider aligning these formats for consistency.Consider applying these changes:
- "from": 999999999999, + "from": "+19999999999", "fromUser": "integrations__test", - "to": 1269579, + "to": "+11269579", "toUser": "integrations", - "timestamp": 1727728969, - "date": "2024-09-30T20:42:49.000Z", + "timestamp": 1695668569, + "date": "2023-09-25T20:42:49.000Z",Also applies to: 8-11, 14-14, 24-29, 32-33
17-22: Expand AI and agent-related test scenariosThe current test event has all AI and agent-related properties set to false or null:
aiAgentis falseaiLeadRating,aiLeadRatingReason,aiAgentOverride, andagentOutcomeare all nullWhile this is a valid scenario, it doesn't cover cases where AI or agent interaction occurs.
Consider creating additional test events that include:
- An event where
aiAgentis true and other AI-related fields have non-null values.- An event with a non-null
agentOutcometo test scenarios involving human agent interaction.This will ensure more comprehensive test coverage for various AI and agent interaction scenarios.
Also applies to: 39-39
11-13: Enhance conversation and data collection properties for better test coverageThe conversation and data collection properties are mostly empty or null:
roomIdhas an unusual format: "1269579:1269579"attachments,callDialog, andfunctionsRunare empty arraysdisposition-notification,summary,voicemailRecording,conversation, andcollectedDataare null or empty stringsWhile these values might be valid for a basic test case, they don't provide comprehensive coverage for data processing scenarios.
Consider the following improvements:
- Clarify the format of
roomIdor adjust it to a more realistic value.- Create additional test events that include:
- Non-empty
attachmentsarray- Sample
callDialogentries- A non-empty
conversationstring- Sample
collectedData- Example
functionsRunentriesThis will provide more robust test cases for systems processing this event data.
Also applies to: 15-15, 40-41, 44-45, 47-49
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- components/vida/actions/provide-context/provide-context.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/vida/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/vida/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/vida/sources/new-conversation-instant/new-conversation-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/vida/sources/new-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/new-incoming-conversation-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/vida/vida.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
components/vida/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The minor version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for adding new components as described in the PR objectives. This change follows semantic versioning principles.
14-14: PublishConfig change is correct.Setting
"access": "public"in thepublishConfigis appropriate for this Pipedream component. This ensures the package will be publicly accessible on npm, allowing Pipedream users to utilize the Vida components.
Line range hint
1-18: Request for additional information on new components.The package.json changes are consistent with adding new components. However, there's no direct evidence in this file of the specific new components mentioned in the PR objectives (webhook sources and actions).
Could you please provide information on where the new components (webhook sources and actions) are implemented? Run the following script to locate relevant files:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate files related to new Vida components # Test 1: Search for files related to webhook sources echo "Files potentially related to webhook sources:" fd -e js -e mjs -e ts 'new-incoming-conversation-instant|new-conversation-instant' components/vida # Test 2: Search for files related to actions echo "Files potentially related to actions:" fd -e js -e mjs -e ts 'provide-context' components/vida # Expect: At least one match for each test, indicating the location of the new componentscomponents/vida/sources/new-conversation-instant/new-conversation-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are concise and relevant to the module's functionality. The use of relative paths indicates a modular structure, which is a good practice for maintainability.
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured source module with appropriate properties.The exported object follows a common pattern for defining a source module in the Vida platform. The properties are well-defined and align with the component's purpose:
- The
keyproperty correctly follows the Vida component naming convention.- The
nameanddescriptionprovide clear information about the component's functionality.- The
versionis appropriately set for a new component.- The
typeis correctly set to "source".- The
dedupeproperty is set to "unique", which is suitable for handling new conversation events.The inclusion of
sampleEmitsuggests the presence of test event functionality, which is good for testing and development purposes.Also applies to: 18-19
4-19: Verify alignment with PR objectives and consider additional properties.The implementation of the "new-conversation-instant" source aligns well with the PR objectives. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
The PR objectives mention that this webhook "emits events after the completion of any communication handled by a Vida AI agent". Consider adding a comment or expanding the description to explicitly state this behavior.
While the PR objectives state that this webhook doesn't require any mandatory properties, it might be beneficial to include optional properties such as 'agent' and 'communication source' to provide more context about the conversation.
Could you confirm if these additional properties are intended to be part of the event object? If so, consider updating the
getSummarymethod to include this information.components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/new-incoming-conversation-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for module functionality.The import statements are correctly using ES module syntax (.mjs extension) and importing necessary dependencies.
4-11: Properties align with PR objectives. Verify "dedupe" setting.The exported object's properties accurately reflect the new-incoming-conversation-instant webhook source as described in the PR objectives. The description clearly states the webhook's purpose.
Please confirm if the "dedupe: unique" setting is the intended behavior for this webhook. This setting suggests that each event will be considered unique and not deduplicated. Is this correct for incoming conversations that might potentially have duplicate events?
1-22: Overall assessment: Well-implemented webhook source with minor suggestions.The
new-incoming-conversation-instant.mjsfile successfully implements the new-incoming-conversation-instant webhook source as described in the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, uses modern JavaScript practices, and includes all necessary components.Key points:
- Proper use of ES modules and import statements.
- Clear and accurate description of the webhook's purpose.
- Implementation of required methods (getSummary and filterEvents) that align with the webhook's functionality.
- Inclusion of a sampleEmit for testing purposes.
Minor suggestions have been made to enhance code clarity, and a few points require verification (e.g., the "dedupe" setting and the content of the test event file).
21-21: LGTM: sampleEmit properly included.The sampleEmit property is correctly set to the imported sampleEmit, which is good for testing and documentation purposes.
Please ensure that the
test-event.mjsfile contains appropriate sample data that accurately represents the structure and content of a typical new incoming conversation event. This will be crucial for testing and integration purposes.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: test-event.mjs contains appropriate sample data.
The
test-event.mjsfile includes sample data that accurately represents a typical new incoming conversation event, which is suitable for testing and integration purposes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the content of the test-event.mjs file # Test: Display the content of test-event.mjs file cat components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/test-event.mjsLength of output: 1332
components/vida/actions/provide-context/provide-context.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is correctly defined and aligns with the PR objectives. The description is informative and includes a helpful link to the documentation.
1-33: Overall implementation looks good, with minor suggestions for improvement.The "Add Context" action has been successfully implemented as per the PR objectives. The code is well-structured and follows good practices. To further enhance the robustness of the action, consider implementing the following suggestions:
- Add validation for the E.164 format of phone numbers in the
targetprop.- Implement error handling in the
runmethod to provide more informative feedback on failures.These improvements will help prevent potential issues and improve the overall user experience when using this action.
components/vida/vida.app.mjs (2)
7-9: LGTM: Base URL method addedThe
_baseUrlmethod is a good addition. It centralizes the API base URL, making it easier to update if needed in the future.
1-46: Overall assessment: Well-implemented with minor suggestionsThe changes in this file effectively implement the required functionality for the Vida app, including methods for adding context and managing webhooks as outlined in the PR objectives. The code is well-structured with good use of abstraction.
Key points:
- All new methods (
_baseUrl,_params,_makeRequest,addContext,createWebhook,deleteWebhook) are correctly implemented.- The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives, particularly the "provide-context" action and webhook management.
- Minor suggestions have been made for improvement, including:
- Adding JSDoc comments for better documentation
- Implementing error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod- Considering a more secure method for passing the API token
Please address these suggestions and verify the impact of removing the
propDefinitionsproperty. Once these are addressed, the changes will be ready for the next stage of review or merging.components/vida/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
40-49: LGTM! Clarify the getSummary method.The run method effectively processes incoming events, applying the filter and emitting events with relevant metadata. This is a good implementation of event handling.
The
getSummarymethod is used in the event emission, but it's not defined in the visible code. Could you please clarify where this method is defined? If it's intended to be implemented by child components, consider adding a default implementation or a comment explaining this requirement.To verify the existence and usage of the
getSummarymethod, please run the following script:components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
1-50: Overall assessment: Well-structured test event with room for documentation improvementsThe
test-event.mjsfile provides a comprehensive test event object that aligns well with the PR objectives for implementing the new-incoming-conversation-instant webhook. It covers various aspects of an incoming conversation, including basic call information, AI-related properties, call-specific details, and user/conversation data.Key strengths:
- Comprehensive coverage of relevant properties for an incoming conversation event.
- Alignment with the Vida platform's features, including AI agent capabilities and campaign integration.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Enhance documentation for various fields, especially AI-related and conversation-specific properties.
- Consider regrouping some properties for better readability.
- Add human-readable fields for user identification.
- Ensure consistency with API documentation and usage across the codebase.
These improvements will make the test event more valuable for developers working on the Vida platform, facilitating easier testing and integration of the new webhook functionality.
38-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance documentation for user and conversation properties
The user and conversation properties provide valuable information about the interaction. However, the purpose and possible values of some fields are not immediately clear.
Consider adding comments or documentation to explain:
- The significance and possible values of
agentOutcome.- When and how the
summaryfield is populated.- The format and content expected in the
conversationfield.- The purpose and possible values of
collectedData.- The meaning of
callingUserIsContactin the context of the application.This additional context will help developers understand how these fields are used throughout the conversation lifecycle and how they relate to the Vida platform's functionality.
To ensure consistency with the API documentation mentioned in the PR objectives, you may want to run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the fields in the test event match the API documentation # Test: Search for field definitions in the API documentation rg --type markdown -i '(agentOutcome|summary|conversation|collectedData|callingUserIsContact).*:' docs/This will help verify that the fields used in the test event are consistent with those defined in the API documentation.
48-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionClarify purpose of collectedData and functionsRun
The
collectedDataandfunctionsRunproperties seem to be important for tracking the conversation flow and data collection. However, their purpose and usage are not immediately clear from the test event.Consider adding comments or documentation to explain:
- The type of data expected to be stored in
collectedData.- The format and content of entries in the
functionsRunarray.- How these properties relate to the Vida AI agent's functionality and the "provide-context" action mentioned in the PR objectives.
To ensure these fields are used consistently across the codebase, you may want to run the following command:
This will help identify other places where these fields are used, ensuring consistent implementation and potentially providing more context for their purpose.
components/vida/sources/new-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
6-7: Review financial and metrics propertiesThe financial and metrics properties seem to be set up for a minimal test case:
- Both
rateandusdRateare set to 0. This is fine for a test event, but ensure this aligns with your testing requirements.- The
durationis set to 1 (presumably 1 second). While this is a valid duration, it's unusually short for a real call. Confirm if this is intentional for your test case.- The
aiRewardandaiRewardUsdare null, which is consistent withaiAgentbeing false.These values are acceptable for a basic test event, but you may want to consider creating additional test events with non-zero values to cover more scenarios.
Also applies to: 18-20, 32-32
1-50: Overall assessment of the test event objectThis test event object provides a good foundation for testing the new-conversation-instant source. It covers many aspects of an outbound call event. However, to ensure comprehensive test coverage, consider the following recommendations:
- Create multiple test event objects to cover various scenarios (e.g., inbound calls, AI agent interactions, non-zero financial values).
- Ensure consistency in data formats, especially for identifiers and phone numbers.
- Add more realistic data for arrays and nested objects that are currently empty.
- Include comments explaining the purpose and relationships of certain properties.
- Verify that the timestamp and date values are appropriate for your testing needs.
Implementing these suggestions will result in a more robust and comprehensive set of test events, improving the overall quality of your testing process.
The current implementation is a good starting point. Enhancements based on the provided suggestions will further improve its effectiveness for testing purposes.
components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/vida/sources/new-incoming-conversation-instant/test-event.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #14121.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Updates
Improvements