Skip to content

Conversation

@letmehateu
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! This PR fixes broken links(paths) to files

PR Checklist

  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • Changeset entry (run npx changeset add)

@letmehateu letmehateu requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2025 06:24
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 16, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 89a4650

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the Formal Verification table in audits/README.md. Three report link URLs are modified to point to a different directory structure. The links for May 2022, March 2022, and October 2021 reports are changed from the ../certora/reports/ path to the ../fv/reports/ path. No other table fields are modified, and no exported or public entity declarations are changed.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining that the PR fixes broken links/paths to files, which matches the summary of updating documentation links.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Update FV reports links' directly describes the main change: updating formal verification report URLs in the Formal Verification table.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@ernestognw ernestognw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ernestognw ernestognw changed the title docs: fix dead links Update FV reports links Nov 19, 2025
@ernestognw ernestognw merged commit 0de8004 into OpenZeppelin:master Nov 19, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants