-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
new class ModelicaSystemDoE #312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
787a78a to
d554b09
Compare
|
converted to draft - It is running but there is still some work need to get it to a working state for all corner cases |
d554b09 to
763850b
Compare
36730bf to
2aab143
Compare
f068f39 to
7545971
Compare
7545971 to
90914d5
Compare
|
@adeas31 I'm not sure if the code in ModelicaSystemDoE will work well for bool or string parameters (= structural); I'm unsure how to correctly set these in OMC and how it will behave. Please advice! |
90914d5 to
e351fb6
Compare
e351fb6 to
08cf292
Compare
4781ac0 to
2c0f632
Compare
5574d42 to
69a9be0
Compare
|
Rebase done; see also #361 for an overview |
4e8b0b2 to
979c3b2
Compare
* no need to add aditional requirements * hint how to use pandas in the docstrings * update test to match code changes
* remove DICT_RESULT_FILENAME * add comment * add DICT_ID_STRUCTURE and DICT_ID_NON_STRUCTURE * rename param_simple => param_non_structure
* add ModelicaSystem.session() - returns _getconn * add ModelicaSystemDoE.session() - returns _mod.session() reasoning: * do not access private variables of a class * limit chain access to (sub)data
it does not exists at this point thus, resolve() and absolute() will fail
24f2c19 to
d37f6ff
Compare
|
I believe this can be closed now since #333 is merged. |
Correct! |
New class to run DoEs based on the available functionality
Usage (see test_ModelicaSystemDoE):
based on PR #310, #311, #313, #314 and #316; see also #230