Add instructions on configuring the NuGet MCP server for GitHub Copilot agent #3497
Conversation
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 2921a69: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds documentation for configuring the NuGet MCP Server to work with GitHub Copilot as a Coding Agent, along with a screenshot showing the configuration interface.
- Adds a new section "Getting started in GitHub Copilot Agent" with setup instructions
- Includes configuration details for the MCP Server JSON settings and GitHub Actions workflow
- Adds a supporting screenshot image showing the Copilot agent settings interface
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/concepts/media/github-copilot-agent-settings.png | New screenshot showing GitHub Copilot coding agent settings interface |
| docs/concepts/NuGet-MCP-Server.md | Adds documentation section for configuring NuGet MCP Server with GitHub Copilot Coding Agent |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 87512fc: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit e0267e4: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
donnie-msft
left a comment
donnie-msft
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reading this document, I can see how customers could easily confuse NuGet Client's MCP server with MCP servers in NuGet packages.
Should all the verbiage be updated to "NuGet Client's MCP server"?
Co-authored-by: Donnie Goodson <[email protected]>
jeffkl
dismissed stale reviews from donnie-msft, kartheekp-ms, and martinrrm
via
e4574d5
|
Learn Build status updates of commit e4574d5: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
No description provided.