Skip to content

Conversation

@JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

```jldoctest
julia> collect(product(1:2,3:5))
julia> vec(collect(product(1:2,3:5)))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

run make docs and commit the result

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or if this isn't exported and not in the manual, then we should document them with qualified names if we want users to know about them. Time for an IterTools module within base?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I'll do that. I'll go with IterTools and see what people think.

This removes a spurious warning if Base.X is deprecated to Mod.X,
and one does `using Mod`. `X` is available from both `Base` and
`Mod`, but we asked for the non-deprecated one so there should
be no warning.
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Oct 12, 2016

I assume this is something you're planning on using for some other feature, which is why it needs to be here rather than Iterators.jl?

@JeffBezanson
Copy link
Member Author

Not necessarily, they just seem to go together. It also reuses some internal types and functions in Base defined for product, so it's much easier to implement here.

@JeffBezanson JeffBezanson force-pushed the jb/itertools branch 4 times, most recently from 7ade52d to 7cc22c5 Compare October 18, 2016 15:00
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the jb/lexproduct branch March 25, 2021 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants