Skip to content

Conversation

@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

This extends #1210, but doesn't need backporting, I guess.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.93%. Comparing base (508e77f) to head (915b8eb).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/diagonal.jl 71.42% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1215      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.97%   91.93%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines       15400    15392       -8     
==========================================
- Hits        14164    14150      -14     
- Misses       1236     1242       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dkarrasch dkarrasch requested a review from jishnub February 27, 2025 09:08
@OlivierHnt
Copy link

OlivierHnt commented Mar 2, 2025

I am not sure how the backporting process is handled in LinearAlgebra. Is there any chance that this indirection strategy can be backported to 1.10? Or maybe just the PR #1210?

@jishnub
Copy link
Member

jishnub commented Mar 5, 2025

Given the potential to address a wide range of method ambiguities, it might make sense to backport this.

@jishnub jishnub added backport 1.11 Change should be backported to the 1.11 release backport 1.10 Change should be backported to the 1.10 release backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 labels Mar 5, 2025
@jishnub
Copy link
Member

jishnub commented Mar 14, 2025

Merge? The test failure seems unrelated.

@dkarrasch dkarrasch merged commit b7bffc1 into master Mar 14, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@dkarrasch dkarrasch deleted the dk/mul branch March 14, 2025 12:38
dkarrasch added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2025
@dkarrasch dkarrasch mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2025
2 tasks
@dkarrasch dkarrasch removed the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Apr 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport 1.10 Change should be backported to the 1.10 release backport 1.11 Change should be backported to the 1.11 release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants