Skip to content

Conversation

@simsurace
Copy link
Member

@simsurace simsurace commented Oct 7, 2023

Fixes part of #526. For some reason I have not been able to figure out, starting from Julia 1.9 the allocations in these AD calls can be off by one from call to call. This PR relaxes the test slightly. I think this still serves the original purpose of the test.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (16a9828) 90.87% compared to head (768912b) 90.87%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #530   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.87%   90.87%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        1458     1458           
=======================================
  Hits         1325     1325           
  Misses        133      133           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@simsurace simsurace marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2023 19:10
@simsurace simsurace marked this pull request as draft October 10, 2023 16:03
This was referenced Oct 23, 2023
@simsurace simsurace changed the title [Don't merge] Test on Julia 1.8 to check whether Transform tests pass Relax allocation test Feb 6, 2024
@simsurace simsurace marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2024 19:50
@simsurace simsurace requested a review from willtebbutt February 6, 2024 22:53
@simsurace simsurace requested a review from devmotion February 7, 2024 15:40
@simsurace simsurace removed the request for review from willtebbutt February 7, 2024 15:45
@simsurace simsurace merged commit 13bd5cb into master Feb 7, 2024
@simsurace simsurace deleted the test-transform-1.8 branch February 7, 2024 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants