Skip to content

Conversation

@jw3126
Copy link
Contributor

@jw3126 jw3126 commented Feb 23, 2018

There is already a setindex function in Base, we should overload it.
It would allow to remove this hack.

@jw3126
Copy link
Contributor Author

jw3126 commented Feb 24, 2018

I think CI fail is unrelated.

@andyferris andyferris merged commit b454bc9 into JuliaArrays:master Feb 25, 2018
tkf added a commit to tkf/Setfield.jl that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
jw3126 pushed a commit to jw3126/Setfield.jl that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2018
* Remove StaticArrays.setindex hack

It's included in StaticArrays v0.7.0:
JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl#370

* Skip test_quicktypes.jl in 0.7

* Use __module__ in Julia 0.7

* "using Test" in Julia 0.7

* Fix deprecated warnings in test_core.jl

* Clarify broken tests due to dot-call syntax

* Simplify settable macro
aplavin pushed a commit to aplavin/Accessors.jl that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
* Remove StaticArrays.setindex hack

It's included in StaticArrays v0.7.0:
JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl#370

* Skip test_quicktypes.jl in 0.7

* Use __module__ in Julia 0.7

* "using Test" in Julia 0.7

* Fix deprecated warnings in test_core.jl

* Clarify broken tests due to dot-call syntax

* Simplify settable macro
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants