Skip to content

Conversation

@chudur-budur
Copy link
Contributor

@chudur-budur chudur-budur commented Jan 19, 2023

Fixes #867 and #861.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

@chudur-budur
Copy link
Contributor Author

@diptorupd

@diptorupd diptorupd marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2023 19:26
@chudur-budur chudur-budur force-pushed the github-861 branch 2 times, most recently from 852a17d to 23e73ed Compare January 20, 2023 01:48
@diptorupd diptorupd merged commit 8b3cf31 into IntelPython:main Jan 23, 2023
@diptorupd diptorupd deleted the github-861 branch January 23, 2023 14:49
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2023
Adding cache and specialization to func decorator 8b3cf31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can't reuse dpex.func device functions with different signatures

2 participants