Update block validate macro in heap_5

[chinglee-iot]

Update block validate macro in heap_5

Description

When configENABLE_HEAP_PROTECTOR is not set in heap_5, pucHeapHighAddress and pucHeapLowAddress won't be updated.
The following assert is always triggered.

    #define heapVALIDATE_BLOCK_POINTER( pxBlock )                       \
    configASSERT( ( pucHeapHighAddress != NULL ) &&                     \
                  ( pucHeapLowAddress != NULL ) &&                      \
                  ( ( uint8_t * ) ( pxBlock ) >= pucHeapLowAddress ) && \
                  ( ( uint8_t * ) ( pxBlock ) < pucHeapHighAddress ) )

This PR upate the heapVALIDATE_BLOCK_POINTER macro when configENABLE_HEAP_PROTECTOR is not set to 1.

Test Steps

Run the WIN32-MSVC demo
Before this pull request

Trace started.
The trace will be dumped to the file "Trace.dump" whenever a call to configASSERT()
fails or the 't' key is pressed.
Note that the trace output uses the ring buffer mode, meaning that the output trace
will only be the most recent data able to fit within the trace recorder buffer.

Starting the full demo.
ASSERT! Line 264, file C:\msys64\home\chinglee\kernel\heap_verify\FreeRTOS\FreeRTOS\S
ource\portable\MemMang\heap_5.c, GetLastError() 0

Trace output saved to Trace.dump

After this PR

Trace started.
The trace will be dumped to the file "Trace.dump" whenever a call to configASSERT()
fails or the 't' key is pressed.
Note that the trace output uses the ring buffer mode, meaning that the output trace
will only be the most recent data able to fit within the trace recorder buffer.

Starting the full demo.

Checklist:

• I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
• I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (af2904b) 94.35% compared to head (60c39e1) 94.35%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #774   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.35%   94.35%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines        2446     2446           
  Branches      598      598           
=======================================
  Hits         2308     2308           
  Misses         85       85           
  Partials       53       53           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	94.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.