Skip to content

Conversation

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member

@ocaisa ocaisa commented May 20, 2025

No description provided.

@eessi-bot
Copy link

eessi-bot bot commented May 20, 2025

Instance eessi-bot-mc-aws is configured to build for:

  • architectures: x86_64/generic, x86_64/intel/haswell, x86_64/intel/sapphirerapids, x86_64/intel/skylake_avx512, x86_64/intel/cascadelake, x86_64/intel/icelake, x86_64/amd/zen2, x86_64/amd/zen3, aarch64/generic, aarch64/neoverse_n1, aarch64/neoverse_v1
  • repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-compat, eessi.io-2023.06-software

@eessi-bot-deucalion
Copy link

Instance eessi-bot-deucalion is configured to build for:

  • architectures: aarch64/a64fx
  • repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-software

@eessi-bot-toprichard
Copy link

Instance rt-Grace-jr is configured to build for:

  • architectures: aarch64/nvidia/grace
  • repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-software

@eessi-bot-surf
Copy link

Instance eessi-bot-surf is configured to build for:

  • architectures: x86_64/amd/zen4, x86_64/amd/zen2
  • repositories: eessi.io-2023.06-software, eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-compat, eessi.io-2023.06-compat, eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-software

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented May 20, 2025

This will have to remain a Draft PR until the CUDA stacks are in sync

@ocaisa ocaisa marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:31
@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented May 20, 2025

@casparvl This is now working, but it is comparing against generic (which is not really a problem since they are all supposed to be the same)

@laraPPr
Copy link
Collaborator

laraPPr commented Jun 27, 2025

@ocaisa Can you retarget this pr and see if anything should be moved to https://github.com/EESSI/software-layer-scripts?

@ocaisa ocaisa changed the base branch from 2023.06-software.eessi.io to main June 27, 2025 11:57
@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Jun 27, 2025

Retriggering CI

@ocaisa ocaisa closed this Jun 27, 2025
@ocaisa ocaisa reopened this Jun 27, 2025
@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Jul 31, 2025

Retriggering this to see where we are

@ocaisa ocaisa closed this Jul 31, 2025
@ocaisa ocaisa reopened this Jul 31, 2025
@laraPPr
Copy link
Collaborator

laraPPr commented Jul 31, 2025

It needs this one to be merged first EESSI/software-layer-scripts#23

@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Jul 31, 2025

I'm not relying on easystacks for this CI, I'm directly comparing the module files/directories.

@laraPPr
Copy link
Collaborator

laraPPr commented Jul 31, 2025

Sorry for the confusion I thought this was a different pr.

@casparvl
Copy link
Collaborator

casparvl commented Aug 5, 2025

Just discussed with Alan: in principle this is ready to go once the CI passes. I.e. for that, we need the missing software for the missing archs to be deployed.

@casparvl
Copy link
Collaborator

casparvl commented Aug 5, 2025

#1147 should bring things in sync, so that the CI passes here. We may want to rebuild gromacs later to tell it to use NEON rather than SVE for certain ARM architectures.

@casparvl
Copy link
Collaborator

EESSI/software-layer-scripts#59 is an intermediate PR, that at least installed CUDA/cuDNN accross the board. Let's retrigger CI, see if those differences indeed went away.

@casparvl casparvl closed this Aug 19, 2025
@casparvl casparvl reopened this Aug 19, 2025
@ocaisa ocaisa closed this Sep 12, 2025
@ocaisa ocaisa reopened this Sep 12, 2025
@ocaisa ocaisa closed this Sep 18, 2025
@ocaisa ocaisa reopened this Sep 18, 2025
@ocaisa
Copy link
Member Author

ocaisa commented Sep 26, 2025

Replaced by #1205 where it should get merged

@ocaisa ocaisa closed this Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants