Skip to content

Conversation

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge commented Oct 5, 2025

According to the logs of the already installed version libxc/6.2.2-GCC-12.3.0, 12 cores were used:

== 2025-04-25 23:51:53,024 build_log.py:267 INFO limiting parallelism to 12 (was 48) for libxc on aarch64/a64fx to avoid out-of-memory failures during building/testing

@bedroge bedroge added the a64fx label Oct 5, 2025
@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Oct 5, 2025

Let's give it a try.

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

@eessi-bot-deucalion
Copy link

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Oct 5, 2025

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.10/pr_101/576626

date job status comment
Oct 05 17:48:41 UTC 2025 submitted job id 576626 awaits release by job manager
Oct 05 17:49:28 UTC 2025 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Oct 05 17:50:31 UTC 2025 running job 576626 is running
Oct 05 21:44:00 UTC 2025 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-576626.out
✅ no message matching FATAL:
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17597002530.tar.gzsize: 133 MiB (139523944 bytes)
entries: 50
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all
libxc/6.1.0-GCC-12.2.0.lua
software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software
libxc/6.1.0-GCC-12.2.0
reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx
2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py
Oct 05 21:44:00 UTC 2025 test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: perf: 581.813 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: perf: 583.004 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: latency: 1.65 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: latency: 1.71 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: bandwidth: 8804.76 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: bandwidth: 8743.28 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-576626.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Oct 6, 2025

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2025.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

@eessi-bot-deucalion
Copy link

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Oct 6, 2025

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.10/pr_101/577742

date job status comment
Oct 06 04:58:05 UTC 2025 submitted job id 577742 awaits release by job manager
Oct 06 04:59:00 UTC 2025 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Oct 06 05:00:03 UTC 2025 running job 577742 is running
Oct 06 05:07:17 UTC 2025 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-577742.out
✅ no message matching FATAL:
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17597268950.tar.gzsize: 0 MiB (21378 bytes)
entries: 1
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all
no module files in tarball
software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software
no software packages in tarball
reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx
2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py
Oct 06 05:07:17 UTC 2025 test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: perf: 582.984 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: perf: 583.765 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: latency: 1.69 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: latency: 1.72 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: bandwidth: 8826.53 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default
P: bandwidth: 8600.12 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-577742.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case
Oct 06 06:13:33 UTC 2025 uploaded transfer of eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17597268950.tar.gz to S3 bucket succeeded

@eessi-bot-deucalion
Copy link

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Oct 6, 2025

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2025.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.10/pr_101/577743

date job status comment
Oct 06 04:58:10 UTC 2025 submitted job id 577743 awaits release by job manager
Oct 06 04:58:57 UTC 2025 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Oct 06 05:00:05 UTC 2025 running job 577743 is running
Oct 06 05:01:08 UTC 2025 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-577743.out
✅ no message matching FATAL:
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.gz created!
Artefacts
eessi-2025.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17597267810.tar.gzsize: 0 MiB (21380 bytes)
entries: 1
modules under 2025.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all
no module files in tarball
software under 2025.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software
no software packages in tarball
reprod directories under 2025.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2025.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx
2025.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py
Oct 06 05:01:08 UTC 2025 test result
😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details)
Reason
EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute.
Details
✅ job output file slurm-577743.out
❌ found message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case
Oct 06 06:13:41 UTC 2025 uploaded transfer of eessi-2025.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17597267810.tar.gz to S3 bucket succeeded

Copy link
Contributor

@trz42 trz42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ocaisa ocaisa merged commit fe903c4 into EESSI:main Oct 6, 2025
68 of 72 checks passed
@bedroge bedroge deleted the a64fx_libxc_parallel branch October 6, 2025 07:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants