Test PR template #1

DavidSpickett · 2023-11-10T13:54:15Z

This is the commit message.

…e defintion if available (llvm#71004)" This reverts commit ef3feba. This caused an LLDB test failure on Linux for `lang/cpp/symbols/TestSymbols.test_dwo`: ``` make: Leaving directory '/home/worker/2.0.1/lldb-x86_64-debian/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/symbols/TestSymbols.test_dwo' runCmd: expression -- D::i PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. HandleCommand(command = "expression -- D::i") 1. <user expression 0>:1:4: current parser token 'i' 2. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: parsing function body '$__lldb_expr' 3. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: in compound statement ('{}') Stack dump without symbol names (ensure you have llvm-symbolizer in your PATH or set the environment var `LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH` to point to it): 0 _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb08b87 1 _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb067ae 2 _lldb.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0x00007fbcfcb0923f 3 libpthread.so.0 0x00007fbd07ab7140 ``` And a failure in `TestCallStdStringFunction.py` on Linux aarch64: ``` -- Exit Code: -11 Command Output (stdout): -- lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision ef3feba) clang revision ef3feba llvm revision ef3feba -- Command Output (stderr): -- PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. HandleCommand(command = "expression str") 1. <lldb wrapper prefix>:45:34: current parser token ';' 2. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: parsing function body '$__lldb_expr' 3. <lldb wrapper prefix>:44:1: in compound statement ('{}') #0 0x0000ffffb72a149c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c749c) #1 0x0000ffffb729f458 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c5458) #2 0x0000ffffb72a1bd0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x58c7bd0) #3 0x0000ffffbdd9e7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc) #4 0x0000ffffb71799d8 lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::SymbolFileDWARF::FindGlobalVariables(lldb_private::ConstString, lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext const&, unsigned int, lldb_private::VariableList&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x579f9d8) #5 0x0000ffffb7197508 DWARFASTParserClang::FindConstantOnVariableDefinition(lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFDIE) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_[lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so](http://lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so/)+0x57bd508) ```

…ooking options for a custom subcommand (llvm#71975) …ooking options for a custom subcommand. (llvm#71776)" This reverts commit b88308b. The build-bot is unhappy (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/13096), `GroupingAndPrefix` fails after `TopLevelOptInSubcommand` (the newly added test). Revert while I look into this (might be related with test sharding but not sure) ``` [----------] 3 tests from CommandLineTest [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.GroupingAndPrefix #0 0x00ba8118 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x594118) #1 0x00ba5914 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x591914) #2 0x00ba89c4 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5949c4) #3 0xf7828530 __default_sa_restorer /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/sigrestorer.S:67:0 #4 0x00af91f0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::ResetAllOptionOccurrences() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e51f0) #5 0x00af8e1c llvm::cl::ResetCommandLineParser() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e4e1c) #6 0x0077cda0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineTest_GroupingAndPrefix_Test::TestBody() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x168da0) #7 0x00bc5adc testing::Test::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b1adc) #8 0x00bc6cc0 testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b2cc0) #9 0x00bc7880 testing::TestSuite::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b3880) #10 0x00bd7974 testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c3974) #11 0x00bd6ebc testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c2ebc) #12 0x00bb1058 main (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x59d058) #13 0xf78185a4 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/csu/libc-start.c:342:3 ```

…lvm#73463) Despite CWG2497 not being resolved, it is reasonable to expect the following code to compile (and which is supported by other compilers) ```cpp template<typename T> constexpr T f(); constexpr int g() { return f<int>(); } // #1 template<typename T> constexpr T f() { return 123; } int k[g()]; // #2 ``` To that end, we eagerly instantiate all referenced specializations of constexpr functions when they are defined. We maintain a map of (pattern, [instantiations]) independent of `PendingInstantiations` to avoid having to iterate that list after each function definition. We should apply the same logic to constexpr variables, but I wanted to keep the PR small. Fixes llvm#73232

… on (llvm#74207) lld string tail merging interacts badly with ASAN on Windows, as is reported in llvm#62078. A similar error was found when building LLVM with `-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address`: ```console [2/2] Building GenVT.inc... FAILED: include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc C:/Dev/llvm-project/Build_asan/include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc cmd.exe /C "cd /D C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan && C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe -gen-vt -I C:/Dev/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen -IC:/Dev/llvm-project/Build_asan/include -IC:/Dev/llvm-project/llvm/include C:/Dev/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/ValueTypes.td --write-if-changed -o include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc -d include/llvm/CodeGen/GenVT.inc.d" ================================================================= ==31944==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ff6cff80d20 at pc 0x7ff6cfcc7378 bp 0x00e8bcb8e990 sp 0x00e8bcb8e9d8 READ of size 1 at 0x7ff6cff80d20 thread T0 #0 0x7ff6cfcc7377 in strlen (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1400a7377) #1 0x7ff6cfde50c2 in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1401c50c2) #2 0x7ff6cfdd75ef in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1401b75ef) #3 0x7ff6cfde59f9 in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1401c59f9) #4 0x7ff6cff03f6c in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1402e3f6c) #5 0x7ff6cfefbcbc in operator delete(void *, unsigned __int64) (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1402dbcbc) #6 0x7ffb7f247343 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180017343) #7 0x7ffb800826b0 (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x1800526b0) 0x7ff6cff80d20 is located 31 bytes after global variable '"#error \"ArgKind is not defined\"\n"...' defined in 'C:\Dev\llvm-project\llvm\utils\TableGen\IntrinsicEmitter.cpp' (0x7ff6cff80ce0) of size 33 '"#error \"ArgKind is not defined\"\n"...' is ascii string '#error "ArgKind is not defined" ' 0x7ff6cff80d20 is located 0 bytes inside of global variable '""' defined in 'C:\Dev\llvm-project\llvm\utils\TableGen\IntrinsicEmitter.cpp' (0x7ff6cff80d20) of size 1 '""' is ascii string '' SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow (C:\Dev\llvm-project\Build_asan\bin\llvm-min-tblgen.exe+0x1400a7377) in strlen Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x7ff6cff80a80: 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 0x7ff6cff80b00: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 0x7ff6cff80b80: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x7ff6cff80c00: 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80c80: 00 00 00 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 =>0x7ff6cff80d00: 01 f9 f9 f9[f9]f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80e00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80e80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x7ff6cff80f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==31944==ABORTING ``` This is reproducible with the 17.0.3 release: ```console $ clang-cl --version clang version 17.0.3 Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc Thread model: posix InstalledDir: C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin $ cmake -S llvm -B Build -G Ninja -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang-cl -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang-cl -DCMAKE_MSVC_RUNTIME_LIBRARY=MultiThreaded -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release $ cd Build $ ninja all ```

The upstream test relies on jump-tables, which are lowered in dramatically different ways with later arm64e/ptrauth patches. Concretely, it's failing for at least two reasons: - ptrauth removes x16/x17 from tcGPR64 to prevent indirect tail-calls from using either register as the callee, conflicting with their usage as scratch for the tail-call LR auth checking sequence. In the 1/2_available_regs_left tests, this causes the MI scheduler to move the load up across some of the inlineasm register clobbers. - ptrauth adds an x16/x17-using pseudo for jump-table dispatch, which looks somewhat different from the regular jump-table dispatch codegen by itself, but also prevents compression currently. They seem like sensible changes. But they mean the tests aren't really testing what they're intented to, because there's always an implicit x16/x17 clobber when using jump-tables. This updates the test in a way that should work identically regardless of ptrauth support, with one exception, #1 above, which merely reorders the load/inlineasm w.r.t. eachother. I verified the tests still fail the live-reg assertions when applicable.

…ass template explict specializations (llvm#78720) According to [[dcl.type.elab] p2](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#2): > If an [elaborated-type-specifier](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#nt:elaborated-type-specifier) is the sole constituent of a declaration, the declaration is ill-formed unless it is an explicit specialization, an explicit instantiation or it has one of the following forms [...] Consider the following: ```cpp template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> struct B; }; template<> template<typename U> struct A<int>::B; // #1 ``` The _elaborated-type-specifier_ at `#1` declares an explicit specialization (which is itself a template). We currently (incorrectly) reject this, and this PR fixes that. I moved the point at which _elaborated-type-specifiers_ with _nested-name-specifiers_ are diagnosed from `ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec` to `ActOnTag` for two reasons: `ActOnTag` isn't called for explicit instantiations and partial/explicit specializations, and because it's where we determine if a member specialization is being declared. With respect to diagnostics, I am currently issuing the diagnostic without marking the declaration as invalid or returning early, which results in more diagnostics that I think is necessary. I would like feedback regarding what the "correct" behavior should be here.

…ing bound ops (llvm#80317) `getDataOperandBaseAddr` retrieve the address of a value when we need to generate bound operations. When switching to HLFIR, we did not really handle the fact that this value was then pointing to the result of a hlfir.declare. Because of that the `#1` value was being used. `#0` value is carrying the correct information about lowerbounds and should be used. This patch updates the `getDataOperandBaseAddr` function to use the correct result value from hlfir.declare.

The concurrent tests all do a pthread_join at the end, and concurrent_base.py stops after that pthread_join and sanity checks that only 1 thread is running. On macOS, after pthread_join() has completed, there can be an extra thread still running which is completing the details of that task asynchronously; this causes testsuite failures. When this happens, we see the second thread is in ``` frame #0: 0x0000000180ce7700 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__ulock_wake + 8 frame #1: 0x0000000180d25ad4 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_joiner_wake + 52 frame #2: 0x0000000180d23c18 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate + 384 frame #3: 0x0000000180d23a98 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate_invoke + 92 frame #4: 0x0000000180d26740 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_exit + 112 frame #5: 0x0000000180d26040 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 148 ``` there are none of the functions from the test file present on this thread. In this patch, instead of counting the number of threads, I iterate over the threads looking for functions from our test file (by name) and only count threads that have at least one of them. It's a lower frequency failure than the darwin kernel bug causing an extra step instruction mach exception when hardware breakpoint/watchpoints are used, but once I fixed that, this came up as the next most common failure for these tests. rdar://110555062

@0

…lvm#80904)" This reverts commit b1ac052. This commit breaks coroutine splitting for non-swift calling convention functions. In this example: ```ll ; ModuleID = 'repro.ll' source_filename = "stdlib/test/runtime/test_llcl.mojo" target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @0 = internal constant { i32, i32 } { i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @craSH to i64), i64 ptrtoint (ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, i32 }, ptr @0, i32 0, i32 1) to i64)) to i32), i32 64 } define dso_local void @af_suspend_fn(ptr %0, i64 %1, ptr %2) #0 { ret void } define dso_local void @craSH(ptr %0) #0 { %2 = call token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32 64, i32 8, i32 0, ptr @0) %3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %2, ptr null) %4 = getelementptr inbounds { ptr, { ptr, ptr }, i64, { ptr, i1 }, i64, i64 }, ptr poison, i32 0, i32 0 %5 = call ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() store ptr %5, ptr %4, align 8 %6 = call { ptr, ptr, ptr } (i32, ptr, ptr, ...) @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32 0, ptr %5, ptr @ctxt_proj_fn, ptr @af_suspend_fn, ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) ret void } define dso_local ptr @ctxt_proj_fn(ptr %0) #0 { ret ptr %0 } ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare { ptr, ptr, ptr } @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32, ptr, ptr, ...) #1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32, i32, i32, ptr) #2 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() #1 attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+adx,+aes,+avx,+avx2,+bmi,+bmi2,+clflushopt,+clwb,+clzero,+crc32,+cx16,+cx8,+f16c,+fma,+fsgsbase,+fxsr,+invpcid,+lzcnt,+mmx,+movbe,+mwaitx,+pclmul,+pku,+popcnt,+prfchw,+rdpid,+rdpru,+rdrnd,+rdseed,+sahf,+sha,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+sse4a,+ssse3,+vaes,+vpclmulqdq,+wbnoinvd,+x87,+xsave,+xsavec,+xsaveopt,+xsaves" } attributes #1 = { nomerge nounwind } attributes #2 = { nounwind } ``` This verifier crashes after the `coro-split` pass with ``` cannot guarantee tail call due to mismatched parameter counts musttail call void @af_suspend_fn(ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) LLVM ERROR: Broken function PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt ../../../reduced.ll -O0 #0 0x00007f1d89645c0e __interceptor_backtrace.part.0 /build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4193:28 #1 0x0000556d94d254f7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:22 #2 0x0000556d94d19a2f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x0000556d94d1aa42 SignalHandler(int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:371:36 #4 0x00007f1d88e42520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) #5 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #6 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_internal ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78:10 #7 0x00007f1d88e969fc pthread_kill ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89:10 #8 0x00007f1d88e42476 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #9 0x00007f1d88e287f3 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #10 0x0000556d8944be01 std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>::size() const /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:919:40 #11 0x0000556d8944be01 bool std::operator==<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>(std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&, std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&) /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1893:23 #12 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Array const&, llvm::json::Array const&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h:572:69 #13 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Value const&, llvm::json::Value const&) (.cold) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/JSON.cpp:204:28 #14 0x0000556d949ed2bd llvm::report_fatal_error(char const*, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:82:70 #15 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::size() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:91:32 #16 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, void>::end() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:282:41 #17 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVector<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, 4u>::~SmallVector() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1215:24 #18 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::~DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:413:7 #19 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoIROptimization::~DiagnosticInfoIROptimization() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:622:7 #20 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::OptimizationRemark::~OptimizationRemark() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:689:7 #21 0x0000556d8e37e876 operator() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2213:14 #22 0x0000556d8e37e876 emit<llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::CGSCCAnalysisManager&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&)::<lambda()> > /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h:83:12 #23 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2212:13 #24 0x0000556d8c36ecb1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::CoroSplitPass, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #25 0x0000556d91c1a84f llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:90:12 #26 0x0000556d8c3690d1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #27 0x0000556d91c2162d llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:278:18 #28 0x0000556d8c369035 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #29 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #30 0x0000556d8e30979e llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroConditionalWrapper.cpp:19:74 #31 0x0000556d8c365755 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #32 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #33 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::isSmall() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:196:33 #34 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::~SmallPtrSetImplBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:84:17 #35 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::AnalysisKey*>::~SmallPtrSetImpl() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:321:7 #36 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::AnalysisKey*, 2u>::~SmallPtrSet() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:427:7 #37 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::PreservedAnalyses::~PreservedAnalyses() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Analysis.h:109:7 #38 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:532:10 #39 0x0000556d897e3939 optMain /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/optdriver.cpp:737:27 #40 0x0000556d89455461 main /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:25:33 #41 0x00007f1d88e29d90 __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 #42 0x00007f1d88e29e40 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20 #43 0x00007f1d88e29e40 __libc_start_main ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:379:5 #44 0x0000556d897b6335 _start (/home/ubuntu/modular/.derived/third-party/llvm-project/build-relwithdebinfo-asan/bin/opt+0x150c335) Aborted (core dumped)

…ter partial ordering when determining primary template (llvm#82417) Consider the following: ``` struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::y); // #1, error: no member named 'y' in 'A' template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::x); // #2 template<> void f(A, int*) noexcept; // explicit specialization of #2 ``` We currently instantiate the exception specification of all candidate function template specializations when deducting template arguments for an explicit specialization, which results in a error despite `#1` not being selected by partial ordering as the most specialized template. According to [except.spec] p13: > An exception specification is considered to be needed when: > - [...] > - the exception specification is compared to that of another declaration (e.g., an explicit specialization or an overriding virtual function); Assuming that "comparing declarations" means "determining whether the declarations correspond and declare the same entity" (per [basic.scope.scope] p4 and [basic.link] p11.1, respectively), the exception specification does _not_ need to be instantiated until _after_ partial ordering, at which point we determine whether the implicitly instantiated specialization and the explicit specialization declare the same entity (the determination of whether two functions/function templates correspond does not consider the exception specifications). This patch defers the instantiation of the exception specification until a single function template specialization is selected via partial ordering, matching the behavior of GCC, EDG, and MSVC: see https://godbolt.org/z/Ebb6GTcWE.

TestCases/Misc/Linux/sigaction.cpp fails because dlsym() may call malloc on failure. And then the wrapped malloc appears to access thread local storage using global dynamic accesses, thus calling ___interceptor___tls_get_addr, before REAL(__tls_get_addr) has been set, so we get a crash inside ___interceptor___tls_get_addr. For example, this can happen when looking up __isoc23_scanf which might not exist in some libcs. Fix this by marking the thread local variable accessed inside the debug checks as "initial-exec", which does not require __tls_get_addr. This is probably a better alternative to llvm#83886. This fixes a different crash but is related to llvm#46204. Backtrace: ``` #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x00007ffff6a9d89e in ___interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0x7ffff6b27be8) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:2759 #2 0x00007ffff6a46bc6 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218 #3 0x00007ffff6a448b2 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:129 #4 __sanitizer::Mutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:167 #5 0x00007ffff6abdbb2 in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock (mu=0x730000000580, this=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:383 #6 __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>::GetFromAllocator (this=0x7ffff7487dc0 <__tsan::allocator_placeholder>, stat=stat@entry=0x7ffff570db68, class_id=11, chunks=chunks@entry=0x7ffff5702cc8, n_chunks=n_chunks@entry=128) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:207 #7 0x00007ffff6abdaa0 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Refill (this=<optimized out>, c=c@entry=0x7ffff5702cb8, allocator=<optimized out>, class_id=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:103 #8 0x00007ffff6abd731 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Allocate (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, allocator=0x7ffff5702cc8, class_id=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:39 #9 0x00007ffff6abc397 in __sanitizer::CombinedAllocator<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>, __sanitizer::LargeMmapAllocatorPtrArrayDynamic>::Allocate (this=0x7ffff5702cc8, cache=0x7ffff6b27be8, size=<optimized out>, size@entry=175, alignment=alignment@entry=16) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_combined.h:69 #10 0x00007ffff6abaa6a in __tsan::user_alloc_internal (thr=0x7ffff7ebd980, pc=140737331499943, sz=sz@entry=175, align=align@entry=16, signal=true) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:198 #11 0x00007ffff6abb0d1 in __tsan::user_alloc (thr=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066, sz=11, sz@entry=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:223 #12 0x00007ffff6a693b5 in ___interceptor_malloc (size=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:666 #13 0x00007ffff7fce7f2 in malloc (size=175) at ../include/rtld-malloc.h:56 #14 __GI__dl_exception_create_format (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd0d0, objname=0x7ffff7fc3550 "/path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/cmake-build-all-sanitizers/lib/linux/libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.so", fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff7ff2db9 "undefined symbol: %s%s%s") at ./elf/dl-exception.c:157 #15 0x00007ffff7fd50e8 in _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", undef_map=<optimized out>, ref=0x7fffffffd148, symbol_scope=<optimized out>, version=<optimized out>, type_class=0, flags=2, skip_map=0x7ffff7fc35e0) at ./elf/dl-lookup.c:793 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- #16 0x00007ffff656d6ed in do_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", who=0x7ffff6a3bb84 <__interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long)+36>, vers=vers@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=2) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:146 #17 0x00007ffff656d9dd in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:195 #18 0x00007ffff64a2854 in dlsym_doit (a=a@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:40 #19 0x00007ffff7fcc489 in __GI__dl_catch_exception (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd310, operate=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:237 #20 0x00007ffff7fcc5af in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x7fffffffd368, errstring=0x7fffffffd370, mallocedp=0x7fffffffd367, operate=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:256 #21 0x00007ffff64a2257 in _dlerror_run (operate=operate@entry=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlerror.c:138 #22 0x00007ffff64a28e5 in dlsym_implementation (dl_caller=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, handle=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:54 #23 ___dlsym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:68 #24 0x00007ffff6a3bb84 in __interception::GetFuncAddr (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:42 #25 __interception::InterceptFunction (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", ptr_to_real=0x7ffff74850e8 <__interception::real___isoc23_scanf>, func=11, trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:61 #26 0x00007ffff6a9f2d9 in InitializeCommonInterceptors () at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:10315 ``` Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay Pull Request: llvm#83890

Modifies the privatization logic so that the emitted code only used the HLFIR base (i.e. SSA value `#0` returned from `hlfir.declare`). Before that, that emitted privatization logic was a mix of using `#0` and `#1` which leads to some difficulties trying to move to delayed privatization (see the discussion on llvm#84033).

Builder alerted me to the failing test, attempt #1 in the blind.

…e exception specification of a function (llvm#90760) [temp.deduct.general] p6 states: > At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template arguments. This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default arguments are substituted. [temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say: > The _deduction substitution loci_ are > - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_, > - the explicit-specifier, > - the template parameter declarations, and > - the template argument list of a partial specialization > > The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in the deduction substitution loci. [...] Consider the following: ```cpp struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1 template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2 template<> void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject ``` Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate being ignored. This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the _noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated. As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the instantiation of the exception specification of a function template specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per [except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).

…ined member functions & member function templates (llvm#88963) Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector: ``` template<typename T> concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long); template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function template<> void f(char); // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function }; template<> template<typename U> void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template template<> template<> void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template<> void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function ``` A number of problems exist: - Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U` substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated function template. - Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5` does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function). - Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`. This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes: - To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed `FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_ of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`. - To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared for explicit specializations that declare functions. In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we previously would select the first function that has the same type as the explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we match EDG's behavior for these declarations.

...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > #3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > #4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > #5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > #6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (llvm#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]>

…ication as used during partial ordering (llvm#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).

…erSize (llvm#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 #3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 #4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 #5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 #6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```

…vm#90820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…llvm#92855) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional wording introduced in llvm#89807 so it also covers deduction of class templates. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again. This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid: ```C++ template<class T, class U> struct A {}; A<int, float> v; template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>); // OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter. void g() { f(v); } ``` --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…des (llvm#94453) LSR will generate chains of related instructions with a known increment between them. With SVE, in the case of the test case, this can include increments like 'vscale * 16 + 8'. The idea of this patch is if we have a '+8' increment already calculated in the chain, we can generate a (legal) '+ vscale*16' addressing mode from it, allowing us to use the '[x16, #1, mul vl]' addressing mode instructions. In order to do this we keep track of the known 'bases' when generating chains in GenerateIVChain, checking for each if the accumulated increment expression from the base neatly folds into a legal addressing mode. If they do not we fall back to the existing LeftOverExpr, whether it is legal or not. This is mostly orthogonal to llvm#88124, dealing with the generation of chains as opposed to rest of LSR. The existing vscale addressing mode work has greatly helped compared to the last time I looked at this, allowing us to check that the addressing modes are indeed legal.

…on (llvm#94752) Fixes llvm#62925. The following code: ```cpp #include <map> int main() { std::map m1 = {std::pair{"foo", 2}, {"bar", 3}}; // guide #2 std::map m2(m1.begin(), m1.end()); // guide #1 } ``` Is rejected by clang, but accepted by both gcc and msvc: https://godbolt.org/z/6v4fvabb5 . So basically CTAD with copy-list-initialization is rejected. Note that this exact code is also used in a cppreference article: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/deduction_guides I checked the C++11 and C++20 standard drafts to see whether suppressing user conversion is the correct thing to do for user conversions. Based on the standard I don't think that it is correct. ``` 13.3.1.4 Copy-initialization of class by user-defined conversion [over.match.copy] Under the conditions specified in 8.5, as part of a copy-initialization of an object of class type, a user-defined conversion can be invoked to convert an initializer expression to the type of the object being initialized. Overload resolution is used to select the user-defined conversion to be invoked ``` So we could use user defined conversions according to the standard. ``` If a narrowing conversion is required to initialize any of the elements, the program is ill-formed. ``` We should not do narrowing. ``` In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed. ``` We should not use explicit constructors.

`rethrow` instruction is a terminator, but when when its DAG is built in `SelectionDAGBuilder` in a custom routine, it was NOT treated as such. ```ll rethrow: ; preds = %catch.start invoke void @llvm.wasm.rethrow() #1 [ "funclet"(token %1) ] to label %unreachable unwind label %ehcleanup ehcleanup: ; preds = %rethrow, %catch.dispatch %tmp = phi i32 [ 10, %catch.dispatch ], [ 20, %rethrow ] ... ``` In this bitcode, because of the `phi`, a `CONST_I32` will be created in the `rethrow` BB. Without this patch, the DAG for the `rethrow` BB looks like this: ``` t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20> t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t0, TargetConstant:i32<12161> t6: ch = TokenFactor t3, t5 t8: ch = br t6, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x562532e43c50> ``` Note that `CopyToReg` and `llvm.wasm.rethrow` don't have dependence so either can come first in the selected code, which can result in the code like ```mir bb.3.rethrow: RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments ``` After this patch, `llvm.wasm.rethrow` is treated as a terminator, and the DAG will look like ``` t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20> t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t3, TargetConstant:i32<12161> t7: ch = br t5, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x5555e3d32c70> ``` Note that now `rethrow` takes a token from `CopyToReg`, so `rethrow` has to come after `CopyToReg`. And the resulting code will be ```mir bb.3.rethrow: %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments ``` I'm not very familiar with the internals of `getRoot` vs. `getControlRoot`, but other terminator instructions seem to use the latter, and using it for `rethrow` too worked.

…arallel fusion llvm#94391 (llvm#97607)" This reverts commit edbc0e3. Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR: ==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8 READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0 #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11 #2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 #34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 #35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 #36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) #37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3 #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<> #3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate #4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator() #7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector #8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1 #9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39 #10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5 #11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39 #12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28 #13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10 #14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3 #15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3 #16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12 #17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56 #18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14 #19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14 #20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3 #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate #3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate #4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > #5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer #6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&) #7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back #8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13 #9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34 #10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14 #13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9 #21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12 #22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7 #23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12 #26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14 #27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10 #28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20 #36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41 #37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10 #38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14 #39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10 #40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12 #41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33 #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 #52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 #53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 #54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) #55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa =>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd 0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==4320==ABORTING

This test is currently flaky on a local Windows amd64 build. The reason is that it relies on the order of `process.threads` but this order is nondeterministic: If we print lldb's inputs and outputs while running, we can see that the breakpoints are always being set correctly, and always being hit: ```sh runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 2 output: Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`func_inner + 1 at main.c:2:9, address = 0x0000000140001001 runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 7 output: Breakpoint 2: where = a.out`main + 17 at main.c:7:5, address = 0x0000000140001021 runCmd: run output: Process 52328 launched: 'C:\workspace\llvm-project\llvm\build\lldb-test-build.noindex\functionalities\unwind\zeroth_frame\TestZerothFrame.test_dwarf\a.out' (x86_64) Process 52328 stopped * thread #1, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00007ff68f6b1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9 1 void func_inner() { -> 2 int a = 1; // Set breakpoint 1 here ^ 3 } 4 5 int main() { 6 func_inner(); 7 return 0; // Set breakpoint 2 here ``` However, sometimes the backtrace printed in this test shows that the process is stopped inside NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory from `ntdll.dll`: ```sh Backtrace at the first breakpoint: frame #0: 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 frame #1: 0x00007ffecc74585e ntdll.dll`RtlClearThreadWorkOnBehalfTicket + 862 frame #2: 0x00007ffecc3e257d kernel32.dll`BaseThreadInitThunk + 29 frame #3: 0x00007ffecc76af28 ntdll.dll`RtlUserThreadStart + 40 ``` When this happens, the test fails with an assertion error that the stopped thread's zeroth frame's current line number does not match the expected line number. This is because the test is looking at the wrong thread: `process.threads[0]`. If we print the list of threads each time the test is run, we notice that threads are sometimes in a different order, within `process.threads`: ```sh Thread 0: thread #4: tid = 0x9c38, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 1: thread #2: tid = 0xa950, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 2: thread #1: tid = 0xab18, 0x00007ff64bc81001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 Thread 3: thread #3: tid = 0xc514, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 0: thread #3: tid = 0x018c, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 1: thread #1: tid = 0x85c8, 0x00007ff7130c1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 Thread 2: thread #2: tid = 0xf344, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 3: thread #4: tid = 0x6a50, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 ``` Use `self.thread()` to consistently select the correct thread, instead. Co-authored-by: kendal <[email protected]>

…izations of function templates to USRGenerator (llvm#98027) Given the following: ``` template<typename T> struct A { void f(int); // #1 template<typename U> void f(U); // #2 template<> void f<int>(int); // #3 }; ``` Clang will generate the same USR for `#1` and `#2`. This patch fixes the issue by including the template arguments of dependent class scope explicit specializations in their USRs.

``` UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp ``` `FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the test isn't Linux-specific at all). With `UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a duplicate innermost frame: ``` compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value #0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35 #1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35 #2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38 ``` which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`. This turns out to be another fallout from fixing `__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In `sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the `pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame (`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`. This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` (with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled).

llvm#118923) …d reentry. These utilities provide new, more generic and easier to use support for lazy compilation in ORC. LazyReexportsManager is an alternative to LazyCallThroughManager. It takes requests for lazy re-entry points in the form of an alias map: lazy-reexports = { ( <entry point symbol #1>, <implementation symbol #1> ), ( <entry point symbol #2>, <implementation symbol #2> ), ... ( <entry point symbol #n>, <implementation symbol #n> ) } LazyReexportsManager then: 1. binds the entry points to the implementation names in an internal table. 2. creates a JIT re-entry trampoline for each entry point. 3. creates a redirectable symbol for each of the entry point name and binds redirectable symbol to the corresponding reentry trampoline. When an entry point symbol is first called at runtime (which may be on any thread of the JIT'd program) it will re-enter the JIT via the trampoline and trigger a lookup for the implementation symbol stored in LazyReexportsManager's internal table. When the lookup completes the entry point symbol will be updated (via the RedirectableSymbolManager) to point at the implementation symbol, and execution will proceed to the implementation symbol. Actual construction of the re-entry trampolines and redirectable symbols is delegated to an EmitTrampolines functor and the RedirectableSymbolsManager respectively. JITLinkReentryTrampolines.h provides a JITLink-based implementation of the EmitTrampolines functor. (AArch64 only in this patch, but other architectures will be added in the near future). Register state save and reentry functionality is added to the ORC runtime in the __orc_rt_sysv_resolve and __orc_rt_resolve_implementation functions (the latter is generic, the former will need custom implementations for each ABI and architecture to be supported, however this should be much less effort than the existing OrcABISupport approach, since the ORC runtime allows this code to be written as native assembly). The resulting system: 1. Works equally well for in-process and out-of-process JIT'd code. 2. Requires less boilerplate to set up. Given an ObjectLinkingLayer and PlatformJD (JITDylib containing the ORC runtime), setup is just: ```c++ auto RSMgr = JITLinkRedirectableSymbolManager::Create(OLL); if (!RSMgr) return RSMgr.takeError(); auto LRMgr = createJITLinkLazyReexportsManager(OLL, **RSMgr, PlatformJD); if (!LRMgr) return LRMgr.takeError(); ``` after which lazy reexports can be introduced with: ```c++ JD.define(lazyReexports(LRMgr, <alias map>)); ``` LazyObectLinkingLayer is updated to use this new method, but the LLVM-IR level CompileOnDemandLayer will continue to use LazyCallThroughManager and OrcABISupport until the new system supports a wider range of architectures and ABIs. The llvm-jitlink utility's -lazy option now uses the new scheme. Since it depends on the ORC runtime, the lazy-link.ll testcase and associated helpers are moved to the ORC runtime.

According to the documentation described at https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/ladwarf.adoc, the dwarf numbers for floating-point registers range from 32 to 63. An incorrect dwarf number will prevent the register values from being properly restored during unwinding. This test reflects this problem: ``` loongson@linux:~$ cat test.c void foo() { asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); } int main() { asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); foo(); return 0; } loongson@linux:~$ clang -g test.c -o test ``` Without this patch: ``` loongson@linux:~$ ./_build/bin/lldb ./t (lldb) target create "./t" Current executable set to '/home/loongson/llvm-project/_build_lldb/t' (loongarch64). (lldb) b foo Breakpoint 1: where = t`foo + 20 at test.c:4:1, address = 0x0000000000000714 (lldb) r Process 2455626 launched: '/home/loongson/llvm-project/_build_lldb/t' (loongarch64) Process 2455626 stopped * thread #1, name = 't', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000555555554714 t`foo at test.c:4:1 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 void foo() { -> 4 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); (lldb) si Process 2455626 stopped * thread #1, name = 't', stop reason = instruction step into frame #0: 0x0000555555554718 t`foo at test.c:4:1 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 3 void foo() { -> 4 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $ra":::"$fs2"); 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); (lldb) f 1 frame #1: 0x0000555555554768 t`main at test.c:8:1 5 } 6 int main() { 7 asm volatile ("movgr2fr.d $fs2, $sp":::"$fs2"); -> 8 foo(); 9 return 0; 10 } (lldb) register read -a General Purpose Registers: r1 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 r3 = 0x00007ffffffef780 r22 = 0x00007ffffffef7b0 r23 = 0x00007ffffffef918 r24 = 0x0000000000000001 r25 = 0x0000000000000000 r26 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry r27 = 0x0000555555554740 t`main at test.c:6 r28 = 0x00007ffffffef928 r29 = 0x00007ffff7febc88 ld-linux-loongarch-lp64d.so.1`_rtld_global_ro r30 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry pc = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 33 registers were unavailable. Floating Point Registers: f13 = 0x00007ffffffef780 !!!!! wrong register f24 = 0xffffffffffffffff f25 = 0xffffffffffffffff f26 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 f27 = 0xffffffffffffffff f28 = 0xffffffffffffffff f29 = 0xffffffffffffffff f30 = 0xffffffffffffffff f31 = 0xffffffffffffffff 32 registers were unavailable. ``` With this patch: ``` The previous operations are the same. (lldb) register read -a General Purpose Registers: r1 = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 r3 = 0x00007ffffffef780 r22 = 0x00007ffffffef7b0 r23 = 0x00007ffffffef918 r24 = 0x0000000000000001 r25 = 0x0000000000000000 r26 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry r27 = 0x0000555555554740 t`main at test.c:6 r28 = 0x00007ffffffef928 r29 = 0x00007ffff7febc88 ld-linux-loongarch-lp64d.so.1`_rtld_global_ro r30 = 0x000055555555be08 t`__do_global_dtors_aux_fini_array_entry pc = 0x0000555555554768 t`main + 40 at test.c:8:1 33 registers were unavailable. Floating Point Registers: f24 = 0xffffffffffffffff f25 = 0xffffffffffffffff f26 = 0x00007ffffffef780 f27 = 0xffffffffffffffff f28 = 0xffffffffffffffff f29 = 0xffffffffffffffff f30 = 0xffffffffffffffff f31 = 0xffffffffffffffff 33 registers were unavailable. ``` Reviewed By: SixWeining Pull Request: llvm#120391

Fix for the Coverity hit with CID1579964 in VPlan.cpp. Coverity message with some context follows. [Cov] var_compare_op: Comparing TermBr to null implies that TermBr might be null. 434 } else if (TermBr && !TermBr->isConditional()) { 435 TermBr->setSuccessor(0, NewBB); 436 } else { 437 // Set each forward successor here when it is created, excluding 438 // backedges. A backward successor is set when the branch is created. 439 unsigned idx = PredVPSuccessors.front() == this ? 0 : 1; [Cov] CID 1579964: (#1 of 1): Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) [Cov] var_deref_model: Passing null pointer TermBr to getSuccessor, which dereferences it.

This will be sent by Arm's Guarded Control Stack extension when an invalid return is executed. The signal does have an address we could show, but it's the PC at which the fault occured. The debugger has plenty of ways to show you that already, so I've left it out. ``` (lldb) c Process 460 resuming Process 460 stopped * thread #1, name = 'test', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: control protection fault frame #0: 0x0000000000400784 test`main at main.c:57:1 54 afunc(); 55 printf("return from main\n"); 56 return 0; -> 57 } (lldb) dis <...> -> 0x400784 <+100>: ret ``` The new test case generates the signal by corrupting the link register then attempting to return. This will work whether we manually enable GCS or the C library does it for us. (in the former case you could just return from main and it would fault)

llvm#123877) Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g., https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio ASan output from local re-run: ``` ==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8 READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0 #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344 #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9 #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42 #3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40 #4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3 #5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15 #6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3 #7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15 #8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12 #9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15 #10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12 #11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12 #12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3 #13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14 #14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14 #15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10 #16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 #17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3 #18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60) ```

Prevents avoidable memory leaks. Looks like exchange added in aa1333a didn't take "continue" into account. ``` ==llc==2150782==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x5f1b0f9ac14a in strdup llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:593:3 #1 0x5f1b1768428d in FileToRemoveList llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:105:55 ```

…ible (llvm#123752) This patch adds a new option `-aarch64-enable-zpr-predicate-spills` (which is disabled by default), this option replaces predicate spills with vector spills in streaming[-compatible] functions. For example: ``` str p8, [sp, #7, mul vl] // 2-byte Folded Spill // ... ldr p8, [sp, #7, mul vl] // 2-byte Folded Reload ``` Becomes: ``` mov z0.b, p8/z, #1 str z0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Spill // ... ldr z0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Reload ptrue p4.b cmpne p8.b, p4/z, z0.b, #0 ``` This is done to avoid streaming memory hazards between FPR/vector and predicate spills, which currently occupy the same stack area even when the `-aarch64-stack-hazard-size` flag is set. This is implemented with two new pseudos SPILL_PPR_TO_ZPR_SLOT_PSEUDO and FILL_PPR_FROM_ZPR_SLOT_PSEUDO. The expansion of these pseudos handles scavenging the required registers (z0 in the above example) and, in the worst case spilling a register to an emergency stack slot in the expansion. The condition flags are also preserved around the `cmpne` in case they are live at the expansion point.

…StrictPackMatch field (llvm#126215) This addresses the MSAN failure reported in llvm#125791 (comment): ``` ==5633==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 in clang::ASTNodeImporter::CallOverloadedCreateFun<clang::ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>::operator() #1 in bool clang::ASTNodeImporter::GetImportedOrCreateSpecialDecl<...> ... ``` The ASTImporter reads `D->hasStrictPackMatch()` and forwards it to the constructor of the destination `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl`. But if `D` is a decl that LLDB created from debug-info, it would've been created using `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl::CreateDeserialized`, which doesn't initialize the `StrictPackMatch` field. This patch just initializes the field to a fixed value of `false`, to preserve previous behaviour and avoid the use-of-uninitialized-value. An alternative would be to always initialize it in the `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl` constructor, but there were reservations about providing a default value for it because it might lead to hard-to-diagnose problems down the line.

We can't guaranty that underlying string is 0-terminated and [String.size()] is even in the same allocation. https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/4152/steps/17/logs/stdio ``` ==c-index-test==1846256==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:96:36 #1 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:521:39 #2 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7 #3 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7 #4 in DumpCXComment llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:685:3 #5 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:768:7 Memory was marked as uninitialized #0 in __msan_allocated_memory llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1023:5 #1 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:172:7 #2 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:216:12 #3 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:53:43 #4 in Allocate<char> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:76:29 #5 in convertCodePointToUTF8 llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:42:30 #6 in clang::comments::Lexer::resolveHTMLDecimalCharacterReference(llvm::StringRef) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:76:10 #7 in clang::comments::Lexer::lexHTMLCharacterReference(clang::comments::Token&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:615:16 #8 in consumeToken llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/CommentParser.h:62:9 #9 in clang::comments::Parser::parseParagraphOrBlockCommand() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp #10 in clang::comments::Parser::parseFullComment() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp:925:22 #11 in clang::RawComment::parse(clang::ASTContext const&, clang::Preprocessor const*, clang::Decl const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RawCommentList.cpp:221:12 #12 in clang::ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(clang::Decl const*, clang::Preprocessor const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:714:35 #13 in clang_Cursor_getParsedComment llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXComment.cpp:36:35 #14 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:756:25 ```

clang-19 changed how Arm triples were normalised and so while we supported 18 and 19, we could not hard code the path here. Now that Linaro's bots are running clang-19, and libcxx is going to drop clang-18 support (llvm#130142) I have simplified it by hard coding the path again. I also looked into why this exists in the first place. It was added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D154246 but not questioned at the time. It is due to the way we build compiler-rt, which is due to the final layout we need in the install: 1. The builtins library must be called libclang_rt.builtins.a for clang to find it. There must not be an architecture name in the filename. 2. That builtins library must be directly in lib/, next to picolib's installed files. To achieve #1 we must set LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=ON. However, that causes the file to be installed in a per-target dir which breaks #2. So to fix that, we move the builtins library up one level into lib/. The alternative is to turn off per-target dirs, which results in a builtin file with an arch in the name, then rename and move that file (since it gets installed into lib/generic/). So in the end, it's the same amount of hacks. I think it's best to keep the one that uses LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=ON, as this is the recommended way to built these days.

…d A520 (llvm#132246) Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, #8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, #32 add x11, x11, #32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, #32 ``` Which is more efficient.

…gger memory is updated (llvm#129092)" This reverts commit daa4061. Original PR llvm#129092. I have restricted the test to X86 Windows because it turns out the only reason that `expr x.get()` would change m_memory_id is that on x86 we have to write the return address to the stack in ABIWindows_X86_64::PrepareTrivialCall: ``` // Save return address onto the stack if (!process_sp->WritePointerToMemory(sp, return_addr, error)) return false; ``` This is not required on AArch64 so m_memory_id was not changed: ``` (lldb) expr x.get() (int) $0 = 0 (lldb) process status -d Process 15316 stopped * thread #1, stop reason = Exception 0x80000003 encountered at address 0x7ff764a31034 frame #0: 0x00007ff764a31038 TestProcessModificationIdOnExpr.cpp.tmp`main at TestProcessModificationIdOnExpr.cpp:35 32 __builtin_debugtrap(); 33 __builtin_debugtrap(); 34 return 0; -> 35 } 36 37 // CHECK-LABEL: process status -d 38 // CHECK: m_stop_id: 2 ProcessModID: m_stop_id: 3 m_last_natural_stop_id: 0 m_resume_id: 0 m_memory_id: 0 ``` Really we should find a better way to force a memory write here, but I can't think of one right now.

we already check for `platform_sp` not null in one line below. existing code ``` if (platform_sp) { Status error; if (platform_sp) { ... ... } } ``` `platform_sp` null check is redundant and error variable is unused. ### TEST PLAN manual test ``` satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ./bin/lldb LLDB logging initialized. Logs stored in: /tmp (lldb) platform select host Platform: host Triple: x86_64-*-linux-gnu OS Version: 6.9.0 (6.9.0-0_fbk5_hardened_1_gf368ae920c1a) Hostname: 127.0.0.1 WorkingDir: /home/satyajanga/llvm-sand/build/Debug/fbcode-x86_64/toolchain Kernel: #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 07:24:41 PST 2025 Kernel: Linux Release: 6.9.0-0_fbk5_hardened_1_gf368ae920c1a Version: #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 07:24:41 PST 2025 (lldb) platform process list 144 matching processes were found on "host" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================ 130461 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu sushd 135505 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu hg.real 817146 874915 satyajanga x86_64-*-linux-gnu vscode-thrift 874915 1 satyajanga 874947 874915 satyajanga ``` and running the existing tests ``` satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ./bin/llvm-lit -v ~/llvm-sand/external/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/commands/platform/ -- Testing: 9 tests, 9 workers -- PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/file/read/TestPlatformFileRead.py (1 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/file/close/TestPlatformFileClose.py (2 of 9) UNSUPPORTED: lldb-api :: commands/platform/sdk/TestPlatformSDK.py (3 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/basic/TestPlatformPython.py (4 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/basic/TestPlatformCommand.py (5 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/connect/TestPlatformConnect.py (6 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/process/launch/TestPlatformProcessLaunch.py (7 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/launchgdbserver/TestPlatformLaunchGDBServer.py (8 of 9) PASS: lldb-api :: commands/platform/process/list/TestProcessList.py (9 of 9) Testing Time: 13.48s Total Discovered Tests: 9 Unsupported: 1 (11.11%) Passed : 8 (88.89%) satyajanga@devvm21837:toolchain $ ```

llvm#138091) Check this error for more context (https://github.com/compiler-research/CppInterOp/actions/runs/14749797085/job/41407625681?pr=491#step:10:531) This fails with ``` * thread #1, name = 'CppInterOpTests', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: address not mapped to object (fault address: 0x55500356d6d3) * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99 frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830 frame #2: 0x00007fffee20917a libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitstd::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() + 58 frame #3: 0x00007fffee224796 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 838 frame #4: 0x00007fffee22494d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 13 frame #5: 0x00007fffed95ec62 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::~IncrementalCUDADeviceParser() + 98 frame #6: 0x00007fffed9551b6 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 102 frame #7: 0x00007fffed95598d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 13 frame #8: 0x00007fffed9181e7 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitcompat::createClangInterpreter(std::vector<char const*, std::allocator<char const*>>&) + 2919 ``` Problem : 1) The destructor currently handles no clearance for the DeviceParser and the DeviceAct. We currently only have this https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/976493822443c52a71ed3c67aaca9a555b20c55d/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp#L416-L419 2) The ownership for DeviceCI currently is present in IncrementalCudaDeviceParser. But this should be similar to how the combination for hostCI, hostAction and hostParser are managed by the Interpreter. As on master the DeviceAct and DeviceParser are managed by the Interpreter but not DeviceCI. This is problematic because : IncrementalParser holds a Sema& which points into the DeviceCI. On master, DeviceCI is destroyed before the base class ~IncrementalParser() runs, causing Parser::reset() to access a dangling Sema (and as Sema holds a reference to Preprocessor which owns PragmaNamespace) we see this ``` * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99 frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830 ```

When running the `openmp` testsuite on Solaris/amd64, many tests `FAIL` like ``` # | OMP: Error #11: Stack overflow detected for OpenMP thread #1 ``` In a `Debug` build, I also get ``` # | Assertion failure at kmp_runtime.cpp(203): __kmp_gtid_get_specific() < 0 || __kmp_gtid_get_specific() == i. ``` Further investigation shows that just setting `__kmp_gtid_mode` to 3 massively reduces the number of failures. Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.

Fix for: `Assertion failed: (false && "Architecture or OS not supported"), function CreateRegisterContextForFrame, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ThreadElfCore.cpp, line 182. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace. #0 0x000000080cd857c8 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13 #1 0x000000080cd85ed4 /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:797:3 #2 0x000000080cd82ae8 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:104:5 #3 0x000000080cd861f0 SignalHandler /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:403:3 #4 0x000000080f159644 handle_signal /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c:298:3 `

The mcmodel=tiny memory model is only valid on ARM targets. While trying this on X86 compiler throws an internal error along with stack dump. llvm#125641 This patch resolves the issue. Reduced test case: ``` #include <stdio.h> int main( void ) { printf( "Hello, World!\n" ); return 0; } ``` ``` 0. Program arguments: /opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang++ -gdwarf-4 -g -o /app/output.s -fno-verbose-asm -S --gcc-toolchain=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot -fcolor-diagnostics -fno-crash-diagnostics -mcmodel=tiny <source> 1. <eof> parser at end of file #0 0x0000000003b10218 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b10218) #1 0x0000000003b0e35c llvm::sys::CleanupOnSignal(unsigned long) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b0e35c) #2 0x0000000003a5dbc3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::HandleExit(int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dbc3) #3 0x0000000003b05cfe llvm::sys::Process::Exit(int, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b05cfe) #4 0x0000000000d4e3eb LLVMErrorHandler(void*, char const*, bool) cc1_main.cpp:0:0 #5 0x0000000003a67c93 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67c93) #6 0x0000000003a67df8 (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67df8) #7 0x0000000002549148 llvm::X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x2549148) #8 0x00000000025491fc llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::X86TargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x25491fc) #9 0x0000000003db74cc clang::emitBackendOutput(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::CodeGenOptions&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem>, std::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream, std::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream>>, clang::BackendConsumer*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3db74cc) #10 0x0000000004460d95 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4460d95) #11 0x00000000060005ec clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x60005ec) #12 0x00000000044614b5 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44614b5) #13 0x0000000004737121 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4737121) #14 0x00000000046b777b clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x46b777b) #15 0x00000000048229e3 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x48229e3) #16 0x0000000000d50621 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd50621) #17 0x0000000000d48e2d ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0 #18 0x00000000044acc99 void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const::'lambda'()>(long) Job.cpp:0:0 #19 0x0000000003a5dac3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dac3) #20 0x00000000044aceb9 clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const (.part.0) Job.cpp:0:0 #21 0x00000000044710dd clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteCommand(clang::driver::Command const&, clang::driver::Command const*&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44710dd) #22 0x0000000004472071 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteJobs(clang::driver::JobList const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4472071) #23 0x000000000447c3fc clang::driver::Driver::ExecuteCompilation(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x447c3fc) #24 0x0000000000d4d2b1 clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd4d2b1) #25 0x0000000000c12464 main (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xc12464) #26 0x00007ae43b029d90 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29d90) #27 0x00007ae43b029e40 __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29e40) #28 0x0000000000d488c5 _start (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd488c5) ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Shashwathi N <[email protected]>

… `getForwardSlice` matchers (llvm#115670) Improve mlir-query tool by implementing `getBackwardSlice` and `getForwardSlice` matchers. As an addition `SetQuery` also needed to be added to enable custom configuration for each query. e.g: `inclusive`, `omitUsesFromAbove`, `omitBlockArguments`. Note: backwardSlice and forwardSlice algoritms are the same as the ones in `mlir/lib/Analysis/SliceAnalysis.cpp` Example of current matcher. The query was made to the file: `mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir` ```mlir ./mlir-query /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir -c "match getDefinitions(hasOpName(\"arith.add f\"),2)" Match #1: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:5:8: %0 = linalg.generic {indexing_maps = [#map, #map], iterator_types = ["parallel", "parallel"]} ins(%arg0 : tensor<5x5xf32>) outs(%arg1 : tensor<5x5xf32>) { ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:7:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %in, %in : f32 ^ Match #2: /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:10:16: %collapsed = tensor.collapse_shape %0 [[0, 1]] : tensor<5x5xf32> into tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:13:11: %c2 = arith.constant 2 : index ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:14:18: %extracted = tensor.extract %collapsed[%c2] : tensor<25xf32> ^ /home/dbudii/personal/llvm-project/mlir/test/mlir-query/complex-test.mlir:15:10: note: "root" binds here %2 = arith.addf %extracted, %extracted : f32 ^ 2 matches. ```

Fixes llvm#123300 What is seen ``` clang-repl> int x = 42; clang-repl> auto capture = [&]() { return x * 2; }; In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_4:1:17: error: non-local lambda expression cannot have a capture-default 1 | auto capture = [&]() { return x * 2; }; | ^ zsh: segmentation fault clang-repl --Xcc="-v" (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x8) * frame #0: 0x0000000107b4f8b8 libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::IncrementalParser::CleanUpPTU(clang::PartialTranslationUnit&) + 988 frame #1: 0x0000000107b4f1b4 libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::IncrementalParser::ParseOrWrapTopLevelDecl() + 416 frame #2: 0x0000000107b4fb94 libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef) + 612 frame #3: 0x0000000107b52fec libclang-cpp.19.1.dylib`clang::Interpreter::ParseAndExecute(llvm::StringRef, clang::Value*) + 180 frame #4: 0x0000000100003498 clang-repl`main + 3560 frame #5: 0x000000018d39a0e0 dyld`start + 2360 ``` Though the error is justified, we shouldn't be interested in exiting through a segfault in such cases. The issue is that empty named decls weren't being taken care of resulting into this assert https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/c1a229252617ed58f943bf3f4698bd8204ee0f04/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclarationName.h#L503 Can also be seen when the example is attempted through xeus-cpp-lite. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b0e6ead-138e-4b06-9ad9-fcb9f8d5bf6e)

# Symptom We have seen SIGSEGV like this: ``` * thread #1, name = 'lldb-server', stop reason = SIGSEGV frame #0: 0x00007f39e529c993 libc.so.6`__pthread_kill_internal(signo=11, threadid=<unavailable>) at pthread_kill.c:46:37 ... * frame #5: 0x000056027c94fe48 lldb-server`lldb_private::process_linux::GetPtraceScope() + 72 frame #6: 0x000056027c92f94f lldb-server`lldb_private::process_linux::NativeProcessLinux::Attach(int) + 1087 ... ``` See [full stack trace](https://pastebin.com/X0d6QhYj). This happens on Linux where LLDB doesn't have access to `/proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope`. A similar error (an unchecked `Error`) can be reproduced by running the newly added unit test without the fix. See the "Test" section below. # Root cause `GetPtraceScope()` ([code](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/328f40f408c218f25695ea42c844e43bef38660b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/Procfs.cpp#L77)) has the following `if` statement: ``` llvm::Expected<int> lldb_private::process_linux::GetPtraceScope() { ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>> ptrace_scope_file = getProcFile("sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope"); if (!*ptrace_scope_file) return errorCodeToError(ptrace_scope_file.getError()); ... } ``` The intention of the `if` statement is to check whether the `ptrace_scope_file` is an `Error` or not, and return the error if it is. However, the `operator*` of `ErrorOr` returns the value that is stored (which is a `std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>`), so what the `if` condition actually do is to check if the unique pointer is non-null. Note that the method `ErrorOr::getStorage()` ([called by](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/328f40f408c218f25695ea42c844e43bef38660b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h#L162-L164) `ErrorOr::operator *`) **does** assert on whether or not `HasError` has been set (see [ErrorOr.h](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/328f40f408c218f25695ea42c844e43bef38660b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h#L235-L243)). However, it seems this wasn't executed, probably because the LLDB was a release build. # Fix The fix is simply remove the `*` in the said `if` statement.

…142952) This was removed in llvm#135343 in favour of making it a format variable, which we do here. This follows the precedent of the `[opt]` and `[artificial]` markers. Before: ``` thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 * frame #0: 0x000000010000037c a.out`inlined1() at inline.cpp:4:3 frame #1: 0x000000010000037c a.out`regular() at inline.cpp:6:17 frame #2: 0x00000001000003b8 a.out`inlined2() at inline.cpp:7:43 frame #3: 0x00000001000003b4 a.out`main at inline.cpp:10:3 frame #4: 0x0000000186345be4 dyld`start + 7040 ``` After (note the `[inlined]` markers): ``` thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2 * frame #0: 0x000000010000037c a.out`inlined1() at inline.cpp:4:3 [inlined] frame #1: 0x000000010000037c a.out`regular() at inline.cpp:6:17 frame #2: 0x00000001000003b8 a.out`inlined2() at inline.cpp:7:43 [inlined] frame #3: 0x00000001000003b4 a.out`main at inline.cpp:10:3 frame #4: 0x0000000186345be4 dyld`start + 7040 ``` rdar://152642178

…ible (llvm#123752) This patch adds a new option `-aarch64-enable-zpr-predicate-spills` (which is disabled by default), this option replaces predicate spills with vector spills in streaming[-compatible] functions. For example: ``` str p8, [sp, #7, mul vl] // 2-byte Folded Spill // ... ldr p8, [sp, #7, mul vl] // 2-byte Folded Reload ``` Becomes: ``` mov z0.b, p8/z, #1 str z0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Spill // ... ldr z0, [sp] // 16-byte Folded Reload ptrue p4.b cmpne p8.b, p4/z, z0.b, #0 ``` This is done to avoid streaming memory hazards between FPR/vector and predicate spills, which currently occupy the same stack area even when the `-aarch64-stack-hazard-size` flag is set. This is implemented with two new pseudos SPILL_PPR_TO_ZPR_SLOT_PSEUDO and FILL_PPR_FROM_ZPR_SLOT_PSEUDO. The expansion of these pseudos handles scavenging the required registers (z0 in the above example) and, in the worst case spilling a register to an emergency stack slot in the expansion. The condition flags are also preserved around the `cmpne` in case they are live at the expansion point.

`clang-repl --cuda` was previously crashing with a segmentation fault, instead of reporting a clean error ``` (base) anutosh491@Anutoshs-MacBook-Air bin % ./clang-repl --cuda #0 0x0000000111da4fbc llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libLLVM.dylib+0x150fbc) #1 0x0000000111da31dc llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libLLVM.dylib+0x14f1dc) #2 0x0000000111da5628 SignalHandler(int) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libLLVM.dylib+0x151628) #3 0x000000019b242de4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x180482de4) #4 0x0000000107f638d0 clang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser(std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>, clang::CompilerInstance&, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem>, llvm::Error&, std::__1::list<clang::PartialTranslationUnit, std::__1::allocator<clang::PartialTranslationUnit>> const&) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.dylib+0x216b8d0) #5 0x0000000107f638d0 clang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser(std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>, clang::CompilerInstance&, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem>, llvm::Error&, std::__1::list<clang::PartialTranslationUnit, std::__1::allocator<clang::PartialTranslationUnit>> const&) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.dylib+0x216b8d0) #6 0x0000000107f6bac8 clang::Interpreter::createWithCUDA(std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>, std::__1::unique_ptr<clang::CompilerInstance, std::__1::default_delete<clang::CompilerInstance>>) (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.dylib+0x2173ac8) #7 0x000000010206f8a8 main (/opt/local/libexec/llvm-20/bin/clang-repl+0x1000038a8) #8 0x000000019ae8c274 Segmentation fault: 11 ``` The underlying issue was that the `DeviceCompilerInstance` (used for device-side CUDA compilation) was never initialized with a `Sema`, which is required before constructing the `IncrementalCUDADeviceParser`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/89687e6f383b742a3c6542dc673a84d9f82d02de/clang/lib/Interpreter/DeviceOffload.cpp#L32 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/89687e6f383b742a3c6542dc673a84d9f82d02de/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp#L31 Unlike the host-side `CompilerInstance` which runs `ExecuteAction` inside the Interpreter constructor (thereby setting up Sema), the device-side CI was passed into the parser uninitialized, leading to an assertion or crash when accessing its internals. To fix this, I refactored the `Interpreter::create` method to include an optional `DeviceCI` parameter. If provided, we know we need to take care of this instance too. Only then do we construct the `IncrementalCUDADeviceParser`. (cherry picked from commit 21fb19f)

llvm#138091) Check this error for more context (https://github.com/compiler-research/CppInterOp/actions/runs/14749797085/job/41407625681?pr=491#step:10:531) This fails with ``` * thread #1, name = 'CppInterOpTests', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: address not mapped to object (fault address: 0x55500356d6d3) * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99 frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830 frame #2: 0x00007fffee20917a libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitstd::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() + 58 frame #3: 0x00007fffee224796 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 838 frame #4: 0x00007fffee22494d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::CompilerInstance::~CompilerInstance() + 13 frame #5: 0x00007fffed95ec62 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::IncrementalCUDADeviceParser::~IncrementalCUDADeviceParser() + 98 frame #6: 0x00007fffed9551b6 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 102 frame #7: 0x00007fffed95598d libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Interpreter::~Interpreter() + 13 frame #8: 0x00007fffed9181e7 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitcompat::createClangInterpreter(std::vector<char const*, std::allocator<char const*>>&) + 2919 ``` Problem : 1) The destructor currently handles no clearance for the DeviceParser and the DeviceAct. We currently only have this https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/976493822443c52a71ed3c67aaca9a555b20c55d/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp#L416-L419 2) The ownership for DeviceCI currently is present in IncrementalCudaDeviceParser. But this should be similar to how the combination for hostCI, hostAction and hostParser are managed by the Interpreter. As on master the DeviceAct and DeviceParser are managed by the Interpreter but not DeviceCI. This is problematic because : IncrementalParser holds a Sema& which points into the DeviceCI. On master, DeviceCI is destroyed before the base class ~IncrementalParser() runs, causing Parser::reset() to access a dangling Sema (and as Sema holds a reference to Preprocessor which owns PragmaNamespace) we see this ``` * frame #0: 0x00007fffee41cfe3 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::PragmaNamespace::~PragmaNamespace() + 99 frame #1: 0x00007fffee435666 libclangCppInterOp.so.21.0gitclang::Preprocessor::~Preprocessor() + 3830 ``` (cherry picked from commit 529b6fc)

These were failing on our Windows on Arm bot, or more precisely, not even completing. This is because Microsoft's C runtime does extra parameter validation. So when we called _read with an invalid fd, it called an invalid parameter handler instead of returning an error. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/%20cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/read?view=msvc-170 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/%20cpp/c-runtime-library/parameter-validation?view=msvc-170 (lldb) run Process 8440 launched: 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\unittests\Host\HostTests.exe' (aarch64) Process 8440 stopped * thread #1, stop reason = Exception 0xc0000409 encountered at address 0x7ffb7453564c frame #0: 0x00007ffb7453564c ucrtbase.dll`_get_thread_local_invalid_parameter_handler + 652 ucrtbase.dll`_get_thread_local_invalid_parameter_handler: -> 0x7ffb7453564c <+652>: brk #0xf003 ucrtbase.dll`_invalid_parameter_noinfo: 0x7ffb74535650 <+0>: b 0x7ffb745354d8 ; _get_thread_local_invalid_parameter_handler + 280 0x7ffb74535654 <+4>: nop 0x7ffb74535658 <+8>: nop You can override this handler but I'm assuming that this reading after close isn't a crucial feature, so disabling the tests seems like the way to go. If it is crucial, we can check the fd before we use it. Tests added by llvm#143946.

# Benefit This patch fixes: 1. After `platform select ios-simulator`, `platform process list` will now print processes which are running in the iOS simulator. Previously, no process will be listed. 2. After `platform select ios-simulator`, `platform attach --name <name>` will succeed. Previously, it will error out saying no process is found. # Several bugs that is being fixed 1. During the process listing, add `aarch64` to the list of CPU types for which iOS simulators are checked for. 2. Given a candidate process, when checking for simulators, the original code will find the desired environment variable (`SIMULATOR_UDID`) and set the OS to iOS, but then the immediate next environment variable will set it back to macOS. 3. For processes running on simulator, set the triple's `Environment` to `Simulator`, so that such processes can pass the filtering [in this line](https://fburl.com/8nivnrjx). The original code leave it as the default `UnknownEnvironment`. # Manual test **With this patch:** ``` royshi-mac-home ~/public_llvm/build % bin/lldb (lldb) platform select ios-simulator (lldb) platform process list 240 matching processes were found on "ios-simulator" PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME ====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================ 40511 28844 royshi arm64-apple-ios-simulator FocusPlayground // my toy iOS app running on simulator ... // omit 28844 1 royshi arm64-apple-ios-simulator launchd_sim (lldb) process attach --name FocusPlayground Process 40511 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP frame #0: 0x0000000104e3cb70 libsystem_kernel.dylib`mach_msg2_trap + 8 libsystem_kernel.dylib`mach_msg2_trap: -> 0x104e3cb70 <+8>: ret ... // omit ``` **Without this patch:** ``` $ bin/lldb (lldb) platform select ios-simulator (lldb) platform process list error: no processes were found on the "ios-simulator" platform (lldb) process attach --name FocusPlayground error: attach failed: could not find a process named FocusPlayground ``` # Unittest See PR.

The function already exposes a work list to avoid deep recursion, this commit starts utilizing it in a helper that could also lead to a deep recursion. We have observed this crash on `clang/test/C/C99/n590.c` with our internal builds that enable aggressive optimizations and hit the limit earlier than default release builds of Clang. See the added test for an example with a deeper recursion that used to crash in upstream Clang before this change with the following stack trace: ``` #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:13 #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:0:3 #3 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3fdf0) #4 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12772:0 #5 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #6 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #7 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 #8 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #9 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #10 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 #11 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #12 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #13 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 #14 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #15 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #16 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 #17 CheckCommaOperand /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:0:3 #18 AnalyzeImplicitConversions /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12644:7 #19 AnalyzeImplicitConversions(clang::Sema&, clang::Expr*, clang::SourceLocation, bool) /usr/local/google/home/ibiryukov/code/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:12776:5 ... 700+ more stack frames. ```

Fix unnecessary conversion of C-String to StringRef in the `Cmp` lambda inside `lookupLLVMIntrinsicByName`. This both fixes an ASAN error in the code that happens when the `Name` StringRef passed in is not a Null terminated StringRef, and additionally can potentially speed up the code as well by eliminating the unnecessary computation of string length every time a C String is converted to StringRef in this code (It seems practically this computation is eliminated in optimized builds, but this will avoid it in O0 builds as well). Added a unit test that demonstrates this issue by building LLVM with these options: ``` CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug LLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address LLVM_OPTIMIZE_SANITIZED_BUILDS=OFF ``` The error reported is as follows: ``` ==462665==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x5030000391a2 at pc 0x56525cc30bbf bp 0x7fff9e4ccc60 sp 0x7fff9e4cc428 READ of size 19 at 0x5030000391a2 thread T0 #0 0x56525cc30bbe in strlen (upstream-llvm-second/llvm-project/build/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x713bbe) (BuildId: 0651acf1e582a4d2) #1 0x7f8ff22ad334 in std::char_traits<char>::length(char const*) /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/char_traits.h:399:9 #2 0x7f8ff22a34a0 in llvm::StringRef::StringRef(char const*) /home/rjoshi/upstream-llvm-second/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:96:33 #3 0x7f8ff28ca184 in _ZZL25lookupLLVMIntrinsicByNameN4llvm8ArrayRefIjEENS_9StringRefES2_ENK3$_0clIjPKcEEDaT_T0_ upstream-llvm-second/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Intrinsics.cpp:673:18 ```

…lvm#148205) In the original motivating test case, [FoldList](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d8a2141ff98ee35cd1886f536ccc3548b012820b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp#L1764) had entries: ``` #0: UseMI: %224:sreg_32 = S_OR_B32 %219.sub0:sreg_64, %219.sub1:sreg_64, implicit-def dead $scc UseOpNo: 1 #1: UseMI: %224:sreg_32 = S_OR_B32 %219.sub0:sreg_64, %219.sub1:sreg_64, implicit-def dead $scc UseOpNo: 2 ``` After calling [updateOperand(#0)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d8a2141ff98ee35cd1886f536ccc3548b012820b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp#L1773), [tryConstantFoldOp(#0.UseMI)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d8a2141ff98ee35cd1886f536ccc3548b012820b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp#L1786) removed operand 1, and entry #&llvm#8203;1.UseOpNo was no longer valid, resulting in an [assert](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/4a35214bddbb67f9597a500d48ab8c4fb25af150/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h#L452). This change defers constant folding until all operands have been updated so that UseOpNo values remain stable.

DavidSpickett closed this Nov 10, 2023

DavidSpickett pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024

[llvm-mca] Fix -skip-unsupported-instruction tests on Windows

a19a411

Builder alerted me to the failing test, attempt #1 in the blind.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Test PR template #1

Test PR template #1

Uh oh!

DavidSpickett commented Nov 10, 2023

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Test PR template #1

Test PR template #1

Uh oh!

Conversation

DavidSpickett commented Nov 10, 2023

Uh oh!

Uh oh!