Skip to content

Conversation

@webmaster128
Copy link
Member

For #1500

@webmaster128 webmaster128 mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2022
5 tasks
@webmaster128
Copy link
Member Author

This makes very little sense as we need the checksum by providing a code ID, not a contract address.

@webmaster128 webmaster128 deleted the ContractInfoResponse--checksum branch January 2, 2023 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants