Change License from GPL to LGPL #4
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Are you going to stick with the GPL license? |
|
would be nice to have it under MIT or so, GPL might reduce the possible spread |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd like to use this as part of a project which has some aspects that are closed source and unfortunately the GPL license would not allow that. Fortunately the LGPL (which is designed for libraries) does allow this. I'm simply replacing the GPL license with the LGPL.
As well, I've cleaned up a few things, removed the qs dependency (as node has a bundled querystring module) and removed the node_modules directory from the repo.