Skip to content

Conversation

andrew-eldridge
Copy link
Contributor

@andrew-eldridge andrew-eldridge commented Jul 25, 2025

Commit Type

  • feature - New functionality
  • fix - Bug fix
  • refactor - Code restructuring without behavior change
  • perf - Performance improvement
  • docs - Documentation update
  • test - Test-related changes
  • chore - Maintenance/tooling

Risk Level

  • Low - Minor changes, limited scope
  • Medium - Moderate changes, some user impact
  • High - Major changes, significant user/system impact

What & Why

Add a "Generate tests" command which performs static analysis on workflow definition to get all testable execution paths and generates corresponding tests for maximum branch coverage.

Impact of Change

  • Users: Easy single-click creation of multiple tests for maximum branch coverage
  • Developers: N/A
  • System: N/A

Test Plan

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • E2E tests added/updated
  • Manual testing completed
  • Tested in:

Contributors

@andrew-eldridge @lambrianmsft

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 25, 2025

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

PR Title

  • Current: feat(vscode): "Generate tests" command for full branch coverage
  • Issue: None. The title is specific, actionable, and clearly communicates the scope and motivation for the PR.
  • Recommendation: No changes needed. Your title is exemplary!

Commit Type

  • Properly selected (feature)
  • Only one type selected, which is correct per guidelines.

Risk Level

  • Risk level is set to "Medium" in both the PR body and as the label (Risk:Medium).
  • Based on the diff, this is an accurate assessment: while introducing a new feature across many files, it mainly adds command registration and static analysis logic (with limited direct user or system risk).

What & Why

  • Current: Add a "Generate tests" command which performs static analysis on workflow definition to get all testable execution paths and generates corresponding tests for maximum branch coverage.
  • Issue: None. The description is concise, provides context, and covers the what and why.
  • Recommendation: No changes needed.

Impact of Change

  • No issues. You provided clear statements for Users (benefit of single-click generation), Developers (N/A), and System (N/A).
  • Recommendation: Consider adding a short note to Developers about the location of the new code if desired, but your section is adequate as written.

Test Plan

  • Marked: Manual testing completed. Given this is a feature addition, this is acceptable for a draft stage, but further review may encourage automated tests in the future.

Contributors

  • Contributors section lists @andrew-eldridge @lambrianmsft—credit given.

Screenshots/Videos

  • No screenshots/videos provided. This is not a visual change, so this is appropriate.

Summary Table

Section Status Recommendation
Title
Commit Type
Risk Level
What & Why
Impact of Change
Test Plan
Contributors
Screenshots/Videos

All required sections of the PR description template are properly completed. No changes are necessary. Excellent work maintaining a high standard of communication and documentation!


Last updated: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:51:41 GMT

@andrew-eldridge andrew-eldridge added the Risk:Low Low risk change with minimal impact label Jul 25, 2025
@andrew-eldridge andrew-eldridge added VSCode Issues or PRs specific to VS Code extension enhancement Improvement to existing functionality and removed needs-pr-update labels Jul 25, 2025
@andrew-eldridge andrew-eldridge added Risk:Medium Medium risk change with potential impact and removed Risk:Low Low risk change with minimal impact labels Jul 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement to existing functionality pr-validated Risk:Medium Medium risk change with potential impact VSCode Issues or PRs specific to VS Code extension
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant