Skip to content

Don't assume LHS of binary overload has a valid type #2098

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2021
Merged

Conversation

dcodeIO
Copy link
Member

@dcodeIO dcodeIO commented Oct 18, 2021

Fixes #2089 by inserting a conversion on the LHS type, producing the expected error.

  • I've read the contributing guidelines
  • I've added my name and email to the NOTICE file

@dcodeIO dcodeIO merged commit 88336dd into main Oct 22, 2021
@dcodeIO dcodeIO deleted the issue-2089 branch November 8, 2021 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LHS of operator overload should check nullability
1 participant