Skip to content

Conversation

@gcatanese
Copy link
Contributor

This PR improves the README adding a section about passing HTTP request headers.
It also adds a test.

@gcatanese gcatanese requested review from a team as code owners October 23, 2025 09:29
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the client library by providing clear documentation and a corresponding test case for including custom HTTP headers and idempotency keys in API requests. This change improves the library's usability for developers who need to pass specific request options, ensuring that such functionality is both documented and validated.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: A new section has been added to the README.md file, detailing how to include additional HTTP headers and an idempotency key in API requests using the RequestOptions object.
  • New Test Case: A new test, testRequestWithHttpHeaders, has been introduced in ClientTest.java to verify the correct application of custom headers and idempotency keys when making API requests.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds documentation and a test for including additional HTTP headers in API requests. The new section in the README provides a helpful example, but it contains a compilation error that needs to be fixed. I've also pointed out a minor formatting inconsistency in the README. The added test case is well-written and correctly verifies the new functionality.

gcatanese and others added 2 commits October 23, 2025 11:53
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@gcatanese gcatanese merged commit 884b446 into main Oct 23, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants