-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
Add TestPixActionQrCode #1541
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add TestPixActionQrCode #1541
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a new unit test specifically for the PixActionQrCode functionality. The primary goal is to ensure the robust and accurate handling of QR code-related payment responses, particularly for Pix payments. This addition is part of a broader effort to troubleshoot and resolve an existing issue, enhancing the reliability of the payment processing logic.
Highlights
- New Unit Test for Pix QR Code Action: A new test method, TestPixActionQrCode, has been added to CheckoutTest.java. This test is designed to verify the correct processing of payment responses containing Pix QR code actions, ensuring that the PSP reference, QR code type, payment method type, and QR code data are correctly extracted and validated.
- Addition of Mock QR Code Response File: A new mock JSON file, pixQrCodeResponse.json, has been created under src/test/resources/mocks/checkout/. This file provides a realistic mock response for a Pix QR code payment, which is crucial for the new unit test to simulate API responses without making actual network calls.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a unit test for PixActionQrCode, which is a good addition to improve test coverage. I've found a few areas for improvement in the new test, including following standard naming conventions, correcting a data discrepancy, and making assertions more robust and comprehensive. Please see my detailed comments.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Add unit tests for PixActionQrCode, this is part of troubleshooting #1534