-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Editorial: fix 'in parallel' usage #129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hiding whitespace makes this easier to review: |
| implementation. User agents MAY impose a rate limit on how | ||
| frequently position changes are reported. | ||
| </li> | ||
| <li>If |document| is not [=Document/fully active=] or |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we check this while "in parallel"? If not then we should do a larger rewrite (perhaps in a follow-up to reduce churn) to only go "in parallel" for specifically the requesting permission and acquiring a position steps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, good point. We should probably just queue a global task here that can then check the state of the document sync.
Co-authored-by: Reilly Grant <[email protected]>
reillyeon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good as an incremental step.
|
Please resolve the merge conflicts and I will merge this change. |
|
Fixed! thanks for the speedy review! |
SHA: a95f47a Reason: push, by @reillyeon Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes #126
Preview | Diff