[cxx-interop] Restrict the uses of anonymous types #84199
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Make sure they are excluded from the reflection metadata (although in the future we want to make sure indirect fields are included). Make sure the users cannot refer to the anonymous field, only its members.
Xazax-hun
requested review from
beccadax,
egorzhdan,
fahadnayyar,
hnrklssn,
ian-twilightcoder,
j-hui,
rjmccall,
susmonteiro and
zoecarver
as code owners
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
j-hui
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2025
DougGregor
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2025
Member
DougGregor
left a comment
DougGregor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks great, thank you!
Xazax-hun
added a commit
to Xazax-hun/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2025
…types [cxx-interop] Restrict the uses of anonymous types
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make sure they are excluded from the reflection metadata (although in the future we want to make sure indirect fields are included). Make sure the users cannot refer to the anonymous field, only its members.