[DebugInfo] Fix bug in constructor homing with classes with trivial

constructors.

This changes the code to avoid using constructor homing for aggregate
classes and classes with trivial default constructors, instead of trying
to loop through the constructors.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87808

Author: amykhuang

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp

@@ -2281,22 +2281,20 @@ static bool hasExplicitMemberDefinition(CXXRecordDecl::method_iterator I,
 }
 
 static bool canUseCtorHoming(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
-  // Constructor homing can be used for classes that have at least one
-  // constructor and have no trivial or constexpr constructors.
+  // Constructor homing can be used for classes that cannnot be constructed
+  // without emitting code for one of their constructors. This is classes that
+  // don't have trivial or constexpr constructors, or can be created from
+  // aggregate initialization. Also skip lambda objects because they don't call
+  // constructors.
+
   // Skip this optimization if the class or any of its methods are marked
   // dllimport.
-  if (RD->isLambda() || RD->hasConstexprNonCopyMoveConstructor() ||
-      isClassOrMethodDLLImport(RD))
-    return false;
-
-  if (RD->ctors().empty())
+  if (isClassOrMethodDLLImport(RD))
     return false;
 
-  for (const auto *Ctor : RD->ctors())
-    if (Ctor->isTrivial() && !Ctor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor())
-      return false;
-
-  return true;
+  return !RD->isLambda() && !RD->isAggregate() &&
+         !RD->hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() &&
+         !RD->hasConstexprNonCopyMoveConstructor();
 }
 
 static bool shouldOmitDefinition(codegenoptions::DebugInfoKind DebugKind,

clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-limited-ctor.cpp

@@ -20,14 +20,56 @@ struct D {
 };
 D::D() {}
 
+// Test for constexpr constructor.
 // CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "E"{{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
 struct E {
   constexpr E(){};
 } TestE;
 
+// Test for trivial constructor.
 // CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "F"{{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
 struct F {
   F() = default;
   F(int) {}
   int i;
 } TestF;
+
+// Test for trivial constructor.
+// CHECK-DAG: ![[G:.*]] ={{.*}}!DICompositeType({{.*}}name: "G"{{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
+// CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType({{.*}}scope: ![[G]], {{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
+struct G {
+  G() : g_(0) {}
+  struct {
+    int g_;
+  };
+} TestG;
+
+// Test for an aggregate class with an implicit non-trivial default constructor
+// that is not instantiated.
+// CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType({{.*}}name: "H",{{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
+struct H {
+  B b;
+};
+void f(H h) {}
+
+// Test for an aggregate class with an implicit non-trivial default constructor
+// that is instantiated.
+// CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType({{.*}}name: "J",{{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
+struct J {
+  B b;
+};
+void f(decltype(J()) j) {}
+
+// Test for a class with trivial default constructor that is not instantiated.
+// CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType({{.*}}name: "K",{{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
+class K {
+  int i;
+};
+void f(K k) {}
+
+// Test that we don't use constructor homing on lambdas.
+// CHECK-DAG: ![[L:.*]] ={{.*}}!DISubprogram({{.*}}name: "L"
+// CHECK-DAG: !DICompositeType({{.*}}scope: ![[L]], {{.*}}DIFlagTypePassByValue
+void L() {
+  auto func = [&]() {};
+}