Consider renaming bindCompose to composedViewFactory

[zach-klippenstein]

The term composed is consistent with the Compose composed function to build Modifiers as composable functions, and also with the Workflow.composed builder function for ComposeWorkflow (which was so-named to be consistent with the modifier builder as well).

The name bindCompose, in particular the term "bind", is vestigial from when ViewFactory was called ViewBinding, so using "ViewFactory" in the name instead seems more logical. That said, I don't feel too strongly since the function is still conceptually "binding" the composable lambda to a particular rendering type.

Thoughts?

[digitalbuddha]

View factory feels more logical. It is how I describe something that takes a rendering and returns a view