Skip to content

Conversation

@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Feb 26, 2018

I would suggest naming all of the courses, and linking to them individually, too. Technically it's redundant but it's free advertising. It's worth announcing the existence of these courses again (and again and again)... many people reading the blog only just tuned in.

@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, good point Seth. I’ve added a commit to fix that.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Feb 26, 2018

additions lgtm

one further thought: should "doesn’t deliver certificates" be expanded upon? someone just tuning in might not know what that means. if we are hoping that people want the certificates (since it's a revenue driver), that might be worth touting in more detail as well...? not sure

@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Seth for your meticulous review! I’ve added a short explanation of what a certificate is. I didn’t expand much, the goal is mainly to announce the availability of the courses on an alternative platform, for people who are not interested in certificates.

@julienrf julienrf merged commit fa65436 into scala:master Feb 27, 2018
@julienrf julienrf deleted the edx-support branch February 27, 2018 15:43
@ashawley ashawley mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants