Skip to content

Update changelog for upcoming v6.0.0 release #50

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 19, 2021
Merged

Update changelog for upcoming v6.0.0 release #50

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
42f63cf
Update changelog for upcoming v6.0.0 release
thomashoneyman Jan 17, 2021
fb011bf
Update CHANGELOG.md
thomashoneyman Jan 19, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 11 additions & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,9 +12,19 @@ Bugfixes:

Other improvements:

## [v6.0.0](https://github.com/purescript-node/purescript-node-fs/releases/tag/v6.0.0) - 2021-MONTH-DAY

Breaking changes:
- Added support for PureScript 0.14 and dropped support for all previous versions (#46)
- Dropped deprecated `globals` dependency (#47)

Other improvements:
- Migrated CI to GitHub Actions, updated installation instructions to use Spago, and migrated from `jshint` to `eslint` (#45)
- Added a changelog and pull request template (#49)

Copy link
Contributor

@JordanMartinez JordanMartinez Jan 18, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Harry fixed the tests in this commit, but it looks like that was pushed straight to master rather than via a PR. Should we make note of that in the changelog and refer to the commit or leave it as is? Otherwise, looks good to me.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@thomashoneyman thomashoneyman Jan 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's fine to leave it out, but I'd appreciate a confirmation from @hdgarrood.

Copy link
Member

@hdgarrood hdgarrood Jan 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am good with leaving this out 👍

## [v5.0.1](https://github.com/purescript-node/purescript-node-fs/releases/tag/v5.0.1) - 2019-07-24

Relax upper bound on `node-buffer`
- Relaxed upper bound on `node-buffer`

## [v5.0.0](https://github.com/purescript-node/purescript-node-fs/releases/tag/v5.0.0) - 2018-05-29

Expand Down