Skip to content

Conversation

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

xref #45182

#45179 was a little too strict since numpy just had a point release.

This should (hopefully) get us to green @jbrockmendel

@mroeschke mroeschke added CI Continuous Integration numba numba-accelerated operations labels Jan 24, 2022
@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

LGTM pending greenish

@jreback jreback modified the milestones: 1.5, 1.4.1 Jan 24, 2022
@jreback jreback merged commit e1aed9c into pandas-dev:main Jan 24, 2022
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jan 24, 2022

@meeseeksdev backport 1.4.x

@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the ci/numpy_numba_invalid branch January 24, 2022 20:43
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/pandas that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2022
@lumberbot-app
Copy link

lumberbot-app bot commented Jan 24, 2022

Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs.

jreback pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2022
np_version_under1p20 = _nlv < Version("1.20")
np_version_under1p22 = _nlv < Version("1.22")
np_version_is1p22 = _nlv == Version("1.22")
np_version_gte1p22 = _nlv >= Version("1.22")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this now the same as not np_version_under1p22?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup that would be the same.

yehoshuadimarsky pushed a commit to yehoshuadimarsky/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI Continuous Integration numba numba-accelerated operations

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants