Skip to content

Conversation

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

appveyor error in TestDataFramePlots.test_parallel_coordinates_with_sorted_labels unrelated.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #18684 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #18684      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.57%   91.58%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         153      153              
  Lines       51257    51254       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits        46937    46939       +2     
+ Misses       4320     4315       -5
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.44% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
#single 40.68% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.81% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/tseries/frequencies.py 94.02% <0%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
pandas/util/testing.py 82.01% <0%> (+0.19%) ⬆️
pandas/plotting/_converter.py 66.52% <0%> (+1.73%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7f6714...44bbf40. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #18684 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #18684      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.57%   91.57%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         153      153              
  Lines       51257    51263       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        46937    46945       +8     
+ Misses       4320     4318       -2
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.44% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
#single 40.69% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/util/_test_decorators.py 93.33% <0%> (-1.91%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.81% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/tseries/frequencies.py 94.02% <0%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
pandas/plotting/_converter.py 66.52% <0%> (+1.73%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7f6714...44bbf40. Read the comment docs.

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche changed the title Fix timestamp asvs BENCH: fix timestamp asvs Dec 8, 2017
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added the Benchmark Performance (ASV) benchmarks label Dec 8, 2017
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 0.22.0 milestone Dec 8, 2017
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche merged commit 1fa55d2 into pandas-dev:master Dec 8, 2017
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
(I removed the sample_time, let's deal with that in a coordinated way)

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the fix_asvs branch December 8, 2017 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Benchmark Performance (ASV) benchmarks

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

broken timestamp asvs

2 participants