VOTE: Voting issue for PDEP-8: Inplace methods in pandas

[jorisvandenbossche]

Issue to track the votes for PDEP-8: Inplace methods in pandas

Pull request with the PDEP discussion: #51466

Rendered PDEP for easy reading: https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/2654fe9ba91dd44ed66f0c246d4ed0c5dde7e391/web/pandas/pdeps/0008-inplace-methods-in-pandas.md (or a website preview at https://jorisvandenbossche.github.io/pandas-website-preview/pdeps/0008-inplace-methods-in-pandas.html)

Cast your vote in a comment below.

• +1: approve.
• 0: abstain.
  • Reason: A one sentence reason is required.
• -1: disapprove
  • Reason: A one sentence reason is required.
    • A disapprove vote requires prior participation in the linked issues/PRs.

Voting will close in 15 days, i.e., on December 29, 2023.

@pandas-dev/pandas-core

[jorisvandenbossche]

And starting with my own +1 (so I am not forgotten in the count ;))

[phofl]

+1 :)

[rhshadrach]

+1

[mroeschke]

+1

[WillAyd]

+1

[jreback]

group 2 inplace returning self
when did this change?

i was ok with the proposal of leaving inplace in group2 (even though we should just kill it entirely ) until i saw this

[jorisvandenbossche]

group 2 inplace returning self, when did this change?

It was mentioned as an "open question" from the beginning (with one of the options to return self), but updated to just propose that option of returning self more recently. I summarized the changes I pushed to the proposal on the PR: #51466 (comment) mentioning the open questions and that I was planning to update the text about returning self, and then #51466 (comment) stating that I had updated the text that way. Further, it was also mentioned in the summary of the PDEP I sent to the pandas-dev mailing a month ago.

Let's leave any further discussion on the PR itself -> #51466

[Dr-Irv]

+1

[jbrockmendel]

+1

[attack68]

+1

[lukemanley]

+1

[fangchenli]

+1

[lithomas1]

+1