-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
JDK-8253700: spurious "extends Throwable" at end of Optional.orElseThrow method declaration #417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8253700: spurious "extends Throwable" at end of Optional.orElseThrow method declaration #417
Conversation
…row method declaration
|
👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@jonathan-gibbons The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
/test tier1 |
| for (TypeMirror t : exceptions) { | ||
| if (!htmlTree.isEmpty()) { | ||
| htmlTree.add(","); | ||
| htmlTree.add(DocletConstants.NL); | ||
| } | ||
| Content link = writer.getLink(new LinkInfoImpl(configuration, THROWS_TYPE, t)); | ||
| htmlTree.add(link); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reminds me of the 8238966: Use a better way of joining things together.
|
Could not create test job |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good. The crux of the fix is really small.
|
@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for more details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
This will not be forgotten, bot. |
|
/integrate |
|
@jonathan-gibbons Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 8cf8e46. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The link for the
throwstype was not filtering out the bounds. A newLinkInfoImpl.Kindis added forTHROWS_TYPE.The loop to generate the list of exceptions is simplified.
A new test is provided. The generated API for
Optional.orElseThrowhas also been verified as correct.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/417/head:pull/417$ git checkout pull/417