Virtual Chassis Cisco interface numbering wrong

[nikor30]

Environment

• Python version: Python 3.8.5

• NetBox version: (v2.10.5)

  On Cisco when you create stacks the second stack member is treated like adding a module to a modular switch.
  In Netbox I use the Virtual Chassis to replicate Cisco stacks. Issue is the interfaces are now double
  TwentyFiveGigE1/0/1 on stack memeber one and two
  

Proposed Functionality

Solution is that by adding a memeber to the Virtual Chassis is for Cisco deivecs is:
stack master => TwentyFiveGigE1/0/1
1 stack memeber => TwentyFiveGigE2/0/1
2 stack memeber => TwentyFiveGigE3/0/1
.
.
.5 stack memeber => TwentyFiveGigE5/0/1

Use Case

Think this is mandatory to reflect as most the reality as possible

[tyler-8]

You'll need to rename the interfaces yourself, to match the on-box numbering. It's just an unfortunate side-effect of all the vendors using different types of chassis/slot interface naming.

[jeremystretch]

Just confirming what @tyler-8 said above. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to this that we can implement blindly; best to handle it on your own to avoid unexpected behavior.

[DanSheps]

This also matches the expected behaviour of a Cisco switch. If you remove switch 2 from a stack, it will be "slot 2" and not "slot 1" unless you go back and renumber the switch.