From fb6b86743defacf81a1531c56e42bde7746f14aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Koch Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:00:26 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update product-catalog.txt minor typo "query was were" -> "queries were" --- source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt b/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt index d4d8f5b4bcd..40375fa90d5 100644 --- a/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt +++ b/source/use-cases/product-catalog.txt @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ key is difficult to predict without information about your database's actual activity and distribution. Consider that: - ``details.issue_date`` would be a poor addition to the shard key - because, although it appears in a number of queries, no query was + because, although it appears in a number of queries, no queries were were *selective* by this field. - you should include one or more fields in the ``detail`` document