[stdlib] generalize isPOD() over suppressible protocols
#1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lorentey
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
lorentey
force-pushed
the
you-cannot-escape-optionals
branch
from
f4e8d43 to
713cfc8
Compare
lorentey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
…n's demangled name when processing it in RegionAnalysis. Just trying to improve logging to speed up triaging further. This is useful so that I can quickly find specific closures we process by using the closure numbering (e.x.: closure #1 in XXXX).
Owner
|
I manually cherry picked this to a fresh rebase! 👍 |
lorentey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2025
Two are fixes needed in most of the `RawSpan` and `Span` initializers. For example:
```
let baseAddress = buffer.baseAddress
let span = RawSpan(_unchecked: baseAddress, byteCount: buffer.count)
// As a trivial value, 'baseAddress' does not formally depend on the
// lifetime of 'buffer'. Make the dependence explicit.
self = _overrideLifetime(span, borrowing: buffer)
```
Fix #1. baseAddress needs to be a variable
`span` has a lifetime dependence on `baseAddress` via its
initializer. Therefore, the lifetime of `baseAddress` needs to include the call
to `_overrideLifetime`. The override sets the lifetime dependency of its result,
not its argument. It's argument still needs to be non-escaping when it is passed
in.
Alternatives:
- Make the RawSpan initializer `@_unsafeNonescapableResult`.
Any occurrence of `@_unsafeNonescapableResult` actually signals a bug. We never
want to expose this annotation.
In addition to being gross, it would totally disable enforcement of the
initialized span. But we really don't want to side-step `_overrideLifetime`
where it makes sense. We want the library author to explicitly indicate that
they understand exactly which dependence is unsafe. And we do want to
eventually expose the `_overrideLifetime` API, which needs to be well
understood, supported, and tested.
- Add lifetime annotations to a bunch of `UnsafePointer`-family APIs so the
compiler can see that the resulting pointer is derived from self, where self is
an incoming `Unsafe[Buffer]Pointer`. This would create a massive lifetime
annotation burden on the `UnsafePointer`-family APIs, which don't really have
anything to do with lifetime dependence. It makes more sense for the author of
`Span`-like APIs to reason about pointer lifetimes.
Fix swiftlang#2. `_overrideLifetime` changes the lifetime dependency of span to be on an
incoming argument rather than a local variable.
This makes it legal to escape the function (by assigning it to self). Remember
that self is implicitly returned, so the `@lifetime(borrow buffer)` tells the
compiler that `self` is valid within `buffer`'s borrow scope.
lorentey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2025
This is the missing check for "rule #1" in the isolated conformances proposal, which states that an isolated conformance can only be referenced within the same isolation domain as the conformance. For example, a main-actor-isolated conformance can only be used within main-actor code.
lorentey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
…g#81643) which generates IR without a llvm.trap function All the normal CI generated this: ``` ret i32 %1 } ; Function Attrs: cold noreturn nounwind memory(inaccessiblemem: write) declare void @llvm.trap() #1 attributes #0 = { "frame-pointer"= ``` But the test-simulator CI doesn't for some reason, so just check for the closing brace instead.
lorentey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2025
…g#81643) which generates IR without a llvm.trap function All the normal CI generated this: ``` ret i32 %1 } ; Function Attrs: cold noreturn nounwind memory(inaccessiblemem: write) declare void @llvm.trap() #1 attributes #0 = { "frame-pointer"= ``` But the test-simulator CI doesn't for some reason, so just check for the closing brace instead.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a generalization of
isPOD()