diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp index d10e6722f4548..41e66bb82650e 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp @@ -2072,9 +2072,11 @@ bool BranchFolder::HoistCommonCodeInSuccs(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { return false; // Hoist the instructions from [T.begin, TIB) and then delete [F.begin, FIB). - // Merge the debug locations. FIXME: We should do something with the - // debug instructions too (from BOTH branches). - { + // If we're hoisting from a single block then just splice. Else step through + // and merge the debug locations. + if (TBB == FBB) { + MBB->splice(Loc, TBB, TBB->begin(), TIB); + } else { // TIB and FIB point to the end of the regions to hoist/merge in TBB and // FBB. MachineBasicBlock::iterator FE = FIB; @@ -2083,7 +2085,7 @@ bool BranchFolder::HoistCommonCodeInSuccs(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { make_early_inc_range(make_range(TBB->begin(), TIB))) { // Move debug instructions and pseudo probes without modifying them. // FIXME: This is the wrong thing to do for debug locations, which - // should at least be killed. + // should at least be killed (and hoisted from BOTH blocks). if (TI->isDebugOrPseudoInstr()) { TI->moveBefore(&*Loc); continue; diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/branch-folder-single-bb-crash.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/branch-folder-single-bb-crash.mir new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..0cb5f997784b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/branch-folder-single-bb-crash.mir @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 +# RUN: llc -mtriple=armv7-apple-ios --run-pass=branch-folder %s -o - | FileCheck %s + +## We hoist code from successor blocks, and in abnormal circumstances we can +## have control flow that branches to the same block. Test we handle that +## correctly. +## +## bb.5 (empty fall-through) folds into bb.6, making bb.2 branch to bb.6 +## unconditionally on a conditional branch (both edges go to bb.6). +## Instructions are hosited from bb.2's successors, which is bb.6 twice, +## along both edges. + +... +--- +name: f_1418_2054 +tracksRegLiveness: true +noPhis: true +isSSA: false +noVRegs: true +body: | + ; CHECK-LABEL: name: f_1418_2054 + ; CHECK: bb.0: + ; CHECK-NEXT: successors: %bb.1(0x80000000) + ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}} + ; CHECK-NEXT: bb.1: + ; CHECK-NEXT: successors: %bb.1(0x40000000), %bb.2(0x40000000) + ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}} + ; CHECK-NEXT: $r0 = MOVr undef $r0, 14 /* CC::al */, $noreg, $noreg + ; CHECK-NEXT: Bcc %bb.1, 1 /* CC::ne */, undef $cpsr + ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}} + ; CHECK-NEXT: bb.2: + ; CHECK-NEXT: successors: %bb.3(0x40000000), %bb.4(0x40000000) + ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}} + ; CHECK-NEXT: $r0 = MOVr undef $r0, 14 /* CC::al */, $noreg, $noreg + ; CHECK-NEXT: Bcc %bb.4, 1 /* CC::ne */, undef $cpsr + ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}} + ; CHECK-NEXT: bb.3: + ; CHECK-NEXT: BX_RET 14 /* CC::al */, $noreg + ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}} + ; CHECK-NEXT: bb.4: + ; CHECK-NEXT: TRAP + bb.0: + successors: %bb.1 + + bb.1: + successors: %bb.3, %bb.2 + + Bcc %bb.3, 1, undef $cpsr + B %bb.2 + + bb.2: + successors: %bb.5, %bb.6 + + Bcc %bb.5, 1, undef $cpsr + B %bb.6 + + bb.3: + successors: %bb.4 + + $r0 = MOVr undef $r0, 14, $noreg, $noreg + + bb.4: + successors: %bb.1 + + B %bb.1 + + bb.5: + successors: %bb.6 + + bb.6: + successors: %bb.8, %bb.7 + + $r0 = MOVr undef $r0, 14, $noreg, $noreg + $r0 = MOVr undef $r0, 14, $noreg, $noreg + + Bcc %bb.7, 1, undef $cpsr + B %bb.8 + + bb.7: + successors: + + TRAP + + bb.8: + BX_RET 14, _ +...