@@ -679,10 +679,13 @@ class Verifier : public InstVisitor<Verifier>, VerifierSupport {
679679void Verifier::visitDbgRecords (Instruction &I) {
680680 if (!I.DbgMarker )
681681 return ;
682- CheckDI (I.DbgMarker ->MarkedInstr == &I, " Instruction has invalid DbgMarker" , &I);
683- CheckDI (!isa<PHINode>(&I) || !I.hasDbgValues (), " PHI Node must not have any attached DbgRecords" , &I);
682+ CheckDI (I.DbgMarker ->MarkedInstr == &I, " Instruction has invalid DbgMarker" ,
683+ &I);
684+ CheckDI (!isa<PHINode>(&I) || !I.hasDbgValues (),
685+ " PHI Node must not have any attached DbgRecords" , &I);
684686 for (DPValue &DPV : DPValue::filter (I.getDbgValueRange ())) {
685- CheckDI (DPV.getMarker () == I.DbgMarker , " DbgRecord had invalid DbgMarker" , &I, &DPV);
687+ CheckDI (DPV.getMarker () == I.DbgMarker , " DbgRecord had invalid DbgMarker" ,
688+ &I, &DPV);
686689 visit (DPV);
687690 }
688691}
@@ -3016,7 +3019,8 @@ void Verifier::visitBasicBlock(BasicBlock &BB) {
30163019
30173020 // Confirm that no issues arise from the debug program.
30183021 if (BB.IsNewDbgInfoFormat )
3019- CheckDI (!BB.getTrailingDPValues (), " Basic Block has trailing DbgRecords!" , &BB);
3022+ CheckDI (!BB.getTrailingDPValues (), " Basic Block has trailing DbgRecords!" ,
3023+ &BB);
30203024}
30213025
30223026void Verifier::visitTerminator (Instruction &I) {
0 commit comments