Skip to content

Conversation

@arik-so
Copy link
Contributor

@arik-so arik-so commented May 27, 2023

No description provided.

@arik-so arik-so force-pushed the 2023-05-channel-type-enum branch from 36c2d54 to 2824fe1 Compare May 27, 2023 01:53
@arik-so
Copy link
Contributor Author

arik-so commented May 27, 2023

Requesting concept ACK @TheBlueMatt?

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

TheBlueMatt commented May 31, 2023

Sorry for the delay. Does it make sense to use the ChannelTypeFeatures instead? Note that since anchors still isn't enabled outside of a cfg I think we can mostly still break the serialization of it just fine.

@arik-so
Copy link
Contributor Author

arik-so commented Jun 1, 2023

Would that be more human-legibility- and maintainability-friendly than the enum? I'm fine using ChannelTypeFeatures.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

I think so, its more straightforward in the sense that its an existing type that captures what we need and will be trivially future-extensible.

@arik-so
Copy link
Contributor Author

arik-so commented Jun 26, 2023

Superseded by #2361.

@arik-so arik-so closed this Jun 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants