bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage

The intention of the current check is to avoid using bpf_sk_storage
in irq and nmi.  Jakub pointed out that the current check cannot
do that.  For example, in_serving_softirq() returns true
if the softirq handling is interrupted by hard irq.

Fixes: 8e4597c ("bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

Author: iamkafai

net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c

@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static bool bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
 	   void *, value, u64, flags)
 {
-	if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
 		return (unsigned long)NULL;
 
 	return (unsigned long)____bpf_sk_storage_get(map, sk, value, flags);
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	   struct sock *, sk)
 {
-	if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return ____bpf_sk_storage_delete(map, sk);