|  | 
|  | 1 | +<p>You are given a <strong>0-indexed</strong> array of <strong>positive</strong> integers <code>nums</code> and a <strong>positive</strong> integer <code>limit</code>.</p> | 
|  | 2 | + | 
|  | 3 | +<p>In one operation, you can choose any two indices <code>i</code> and <code>j</code> and swap <code>nums[i]</code> and <code>nums[j]</code> <strong>if</strong> <code>|nums[i] - nums[j]| <= limit</code>.</p> | 
|  | 4 | + | 
|  | 5 | +<p>Return <em>the <strong>lexicographically smallest array</strong> that can be obtained by performing the operation any number of times</em>.</p> | 
|  | 6 | + | 
|  | 7 | +<p>An array <code>a</code> is lexicographically smaller than an array <code>b</code> if in the first position where <code>a</code> and <code>b</code> differ, array <code>a</code> has an element that is less than the corresponding element in <code>b</code>. For example, the array <code>[2,10,3]</code> is lexicographically smaller than the array <code>[10,2,3]</code> because they differ at index <code>0</code> and <code>2 < 10</code>.</p> | 
|  | 8 | + | 
|  | 9 | +<p> </p> | 
|  | 10 | +<p><strong class="example">Example 1:</strong></p> | 
|  | 11 | + | 
|  | 12 | +<pre> | 
|  | 13 | +<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,5,3,9,8], limit = 2 | 
|  | 14 | +<strong>Output:</strong> [1,3,5,8,9] | 
|  | 15 | +<strong>Explanation:</strong> Apply the operation 2 times: | 
|  | 16 | +- Swap nums[1] with nums[2]. The array becomes [1,3,5,9,8] | 
|  | 17 | +- Swap nums[3] with nums[4]. The array becomes [1,3,5,8,9] | 
|  | 18 | +We cannot obtain a lexicographically smaller array by applying any more operations. | 
|  | 19 | +Note that it may be possible to get the same result by doing different operations. | 
|  | 20 | +</pre> | 
|  | 21 | + | 
|  | 22 | +<p><strong class="example">Example 2:</strong></p> | 
|  | 23 | + | 
|  | 24 | +<pre> | 
|  | 25 | +<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,7,6,18,2,1], limit = 3 | 
|  | 26 | +<strong>Output:</strong> [1,6,7,18,1,2] | 
|  | 27 | +<strong>Explanation:</strong> Apply the operation 3 times: | 
|  | 28 | +- Swap nums[1] with nums[2]. The array becomes [1,6,7,18,2,1] | 
|  | 29 | +- Swap nums[0] with nums[4]. The array becomes [2,6,7,18,1,1] | 
|  | 30 | +- Swap nums[0] with nums[5]. The array becomes [1,6,7,18,1,2] | 
|  | 31 | +We cannot obtain a lexicographically smaller array by applying any more operations. | 
|  | 32 | +</pre> | 
|  | 33 | + | 
|  | 34 | +<p><strong class="example">Example 3:</strong></p> | 
|  | 35 | + | 
|  | 36 | +<pre> | 
|  | 37 | +<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,7,28,19,10], limit = 3 | 
|  | 38 | +<strong>Output:</strong> [1,7,28,19,10] | 
|  | 39 | +<strong>Explanation:</strong> [1,7,28,19,10] is the lexicographically smallest array we can obtain because we cannot apply the operation on any two indices. | 
|  | 40 | +</pre> | 
|  | 41 | + | 
|  | 42 | +<p> </p> | 
|  | 43 | +<p><strong>Constraints:</strong></p> | 
|  | 44 | + | 
|  | 45 | +<ul> | 
|  | 46 | +	<li><code>1 <= nums.length <= 10<sup>5</sup></code></li> | 
|  | 47 | +	<li><code>1 <= nums[i] <= 10<sup>9</sup></code></li> | 
|  | 48 | +	<li><code>1 <= limit <= 10<sup>9</sup></code></li> | 
|  | 49 | +</ul> | 
0 commit comments