Skip to content

Conversation

@kyriediculous
Copy link
Contributor

@kyriediculous kyriediculous commented Sep 23, 2023

This came up in our Tenderize audits done by Halborn.

Copy link
Member

@pcarranzav pcarranzav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kyriediculous! LGTM

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (59240bd) 92.60% compared to head (6b7f074) 92.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #863   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.60%   92.60%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        2368     2368           
  Branches      432      432           
=======================================
  Hits         2193     2193           
  Misses        175      175           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tmigone tmigone merged commit cfff549 into graphprotocol:main Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants