Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 7, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@cuonglm
Copy link
Member

@cuonglm cuonglm commented Apr 20, 2021

Arm64 does not have scaled register format, casue snappy test failed for
current go tip:

	$ go version
	go version devel go1.17-24875e3880 Tue Apr 20 15:14:05 2021 +0000 darwin/arm64
	$ go test
	# github.com/golang/snappy
	./encode_arm64.s:385: arm64 doesn't support scaled register format
	./encode_arm64.s:675: arm64 doesn't support scaled register format
	asm: assembly of ./encode_arm64.s failed
	FAIL	github.com/golang/snappy [build failed]

See https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/289589

Arm64 does not have scaled register format, casue snappy test failed for
current go tip:

	$ go version
	go version devel go1.17-24875e3880 Tue Apr 20 15:14:05 2021 +0000 darwin/arm64
	$ go test
	# github.com/golang/snappy
	./encode_arm64.s:385: arm64 doesn't support scaled register format
	./encode_arm64.s:675: arm64 doesn't support scaled register format
	asm: assembly of ./encode_arm64.s failed
	FAIL	github.com/golang/snappy [build failed]

See https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/289589
@cuonglm
Copy link
Member Author

cuonglm commented Apr 22, 2021

Kindly ping @nigeltao

@nigeltao
Copy link
Contributor

@AWSjswinney can you have a look?

@AWSjswinney
Copy link
Contributor

As expected, the assembler in the 1.17 candidate emits the exact same instruction as previous versions (same for both changed lines):

b8af68c4        ldrsw   x4, [x6, x15]

Looks good to me.

@nigeltao nigeltao merged commit 33fc3d5 into golang:master May 2, 2021
@AWSjswinney
Copy link
Contributor

@nigeltao You might want to tag a release after this merge because this issue is going to become mainstream as soon as projects start building with Go 1.17, due in about a month.

@cuonglm
Copy link
Member Author

cuonglm commented Jun 29, 2021

@AWSjswinney @nigeltao it's not necessary anymore, since when Cherry decide to restore supporting for *1 syntax, see https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/328229

@AWSjswinney
Copy link
Contributor

Great! Thanks for pointing that out.

@nigeltao
Copy link
Contributor

nigeltao commented Jul 1, 2021

It might not be necessary, but it was easy to tag v0.0.4

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants