diff --git a/static/app/views/explore/hooks/useGroupByFields.tsx b/static/app/views/explore/hooks/useGroupByFields.tsx
index e7fb2d2b5730c3..b77f609027de9b 100644
--- a/static/app/views/explore/hooks/useGroupByFields.tsx
+++ b/static/app/views/explore/hooks/useGroupByFields.tsx
@@ -16,14 +16,17 @@ interface UseGroupByFieldsProps {
    */
   groupBys: string[];
   tags: TagCollection;
-  prefix?: string;
+  hideEmptyOption?: boolean;
 }
 
-export function useGroupByFields({tags, groupBys}: UseGroupByFieldsProps) {
+export function useGroupByFields({
+  tags,
+  groupBys,
+  hideEmptyOption,
+}: UseGroupByFieldsProps) {
   const options: Array<SelectOption<string>> = useMemo(() => {
     const potentialOptions = [
-      // We do not support grouping by span id, we have a dedicated sample mode for that
-      ...Object.keys(tags).filter(key => key !== 'id'),
+      ...Object.keys(tags).filter(key => !DISALLOWED_GROUP_BY_FIELDS.has(key)),
 
       // These options aren't known to exist on this project but it was inserted into
       // the group bys somehow so it should be a valid options in the group bys.
@@ -36,11 +39,15 @@ export function useGroupByFields({tags, groupBys}: UseGroupByFieldsProps) {
 
     return [
       // hard code in an empty option
-      {
-        label: <Disabled>{t('\u2014')}</Disabled>,
-        value: UNGROUPED,
-        textValue: t('\u2014'),
-      },
+      ...(hideEmptyOption
+        ? []
+        : [
+            {
+              label: <Disabled>{t('\u2014')}</Disabled>,
+              value: UNGROUPED,
+              textValue: t('\u2014'),
+            },
+          ]),
       ...potentialOptions.map(key => {
         const kind = FieldKind.TAG;
         return {
@@ -53,11 +60,15 @@ export function useGroupByFields({tags, groupBys}: UseGroupByFieldsProps) {
         };
       }),
     ];
-  }, [tags, groupBys]);
+  }, [tags, groupBys, hideEmptyOption]);
 
   return options;
 }
 
+// Some fields don't make sense to allow users to group by as they create
+// very high cardinality groupings and is not useful.
+const DISALLOWED_GROUP_BY_FIELDS = new Set(['id', 'timestamp']);
+
 const Disabled = styled('span')`
   color: ${p => p.theme.subText};
 `;
diff --git a/static/app/views/explore/multiQueryMode/queryConstructors/groupBy.tsx b/static/app/views/explore/multiQueryMode/queryConstructors/groupBy.tsx
index 0743d172d25914..c08a45e41ec398 100644
--- a/static/app/views/explore/multiQueryMode/queryConstructors/groupBy.tsx
+++ b/static/app/views/explore/multiQueryMode/queryConstructors/groupBy.tsx
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-import {useMemo} from 'react';
 import styled from '@emotion/styled';
 
 import {CompactSelect, type SelectOption} from 'sentry/components/core/compactSelect';
 import {Tooltip} from 'sentry/components/core/tooltip';
 import {t} from 'sentry/locale';
 import {useSpanTags} from 'sentry/views/explore/contexts/spanTagsContext';
+import {useGroupByFields} from 'sentry/views/explore/hooks/useGroupByFields';
 import {
   type ReadableExploreQueryParts,
   useUpdateQueryAtIndex,
@@ -22,20 +22,11 @@ export function GroupBySection({query, index}: Props) {
 
   const updateGroupBys = useUpdateQueryAtIndex(index);
 
-  const enabledOptions: Array<SelectOption<string>> = useMemo(() => {
-    const potentialOptions = Object.keys(tags).filter(key => key !== 'id');
-    potentialOptions.sort((a, b) => {
-      if (query.groupBys.includes(a) === query.groupBys.includes(b)) {
-        return a.localeCompare(b);
-      }
-      if (query.groupBys.includes(a)) {
-        return -1;
-      }
-      return 1;
-    });
-
-    return potentialOptions.map(key => ({label: key, value: key, textValue: key}));
-  }, [tags, query.groupBys]);
+  const enabledOptions: Array<SelectOption<string>> = useGroupByFields({
+    groupBys: [],
+    tags,
+    hideEmptyOption: true,
+  });
 
   return (
     <Section data-test-id={`section-group-by-${index}`}>