|
| 1 | +# Purpose |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +This document exists to align on a design for simplifying the process for sending `ETH` between two interoperable chains. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +# Summary |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +New functionality is introduced to the `ETHLiquidity` contract that enables it to facilitate cross-chain `ETH` transfers to a specified recipient. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +# Problem Statement + Context |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Currently, L2-to-L2 `ETH` transfers between two interoperable chains require four separate transactions: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +1. Wrap `ETH` to `SuperchainWETH`. |
| 14 | +2. Call `SuperchainTokenBridge#SendERC20` to burn `SuperchainWETH` on source chain and relay a message to the destination chain that mints `SuperchainWETH` to the recipient. |
| 15 | +3. Execute the message on the destination chain, triggering `SuperchainTokenBridge#RelayERC20` to mint `SuperchainWETH` to the recipient. |
| 16 | +4. Unwrap the received `SuperchainWETH` to `ETH`. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +The goal is to reduce the transaction count from four to two, enabling users to send `ETH` to a destination chain directly: |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +1. Burn `ETH` on source chain and relay a message to destination chain that mints `ETH` to recipient on destination chain. |
| 21 | +2. Execute the relayed message on the destination chain that mints `ETH` to the recipient. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +# Proposed Solution |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +Introduce `SendETH` and `RelayETH` functions to the `ETHLiquidity` contract. By adding these functions directly to `ETHLiquidity`, the contract retains its original purpose of centralizing the minting and burning of `ETH` for cross-chain transfers, ensuring that all liquidity management occurs within a single, dedicated contract. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +### `SendETH` function |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +The `SendETH` function combines the first two transactions as follows: |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +1. Burns `ETH` within the `ETHLiquidity` contract equivalent to the `ETH` sent. |
| 32 | +2. Sends a message to the destination chain encoding a call to `RelayETH`. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +### `RelayETH` function |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +The `RelayETH` function combines the last two transactions as follows: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +1. Mints the specified `_amount` of `ETH` from the `ETHLiquidity` contract. |
| 39 | +2. Sends the minted `ETH` to the specified recipient. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +### Contract changes |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +Update the `burn` function to be callable by the `ETHLiquidity` contract: |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +```solidity |
| 46 | +/// @notice Allows an address to lock ETH liquidity into this contract. |
| 47 | +function burn() external payable { |
| 48 | + if (msg.sender != Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH && msg.sender != address(this)) revert Unauthorized(); |
| 49 | + if (IL1Block(Predeploys.L1_BLOCK_ATTRIBUTES).isCustomGasToken()) revert NotCustomGasToken(); |
| 50 | + emit LiquidityBurned(msg.sender, msg.value); |
| 51 | +} |
| 52 | +``` |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Update the `mint` function to have a `_recipient` parameter and to be callable by the `ETHLiquidity` contract: |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +```solidity |
| 57 | +/// @notice Allows an address to unlock ETH liquidity from this contract. |
| 58 | +/// @param _recipient Address to send ETH to. |
| 59 | +/// @param _amount The amount of liquidity to unlock. |
| 60 | +function mint(address _recipient, uint256 _amount) external { |
| 61 | + if (msg.sender != Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH && msg.sender != address(this)) revert Unauthorized(); |
| 62 | + if (IL1Block(Predeploys.L1_BLOCK_ATTRIBUTES).isCustomGasToken()) revert NotCustomGasToken(); |
| 63 | + new SafeSend{ value: _amount }(payable(_recipient)); |
| 64 | + emit LiquidityMinted(_recipient, _amount); |
| 65 | +} |
| 66 | +``` |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +Add `SendETH` and `RelayETH` function to `ETHLiquidity`: |
| 69 | +```solidity |
| 70 | +/// @notice Sends ETH to some target address on another chain. |
| 71 | +/// @param _to Address to send ETH to. |
| 72 | +/// @param _chainId Chain ID of the destination chain. |
| 73 | +function sendETH(address _to, uint256 _chainId) public payable { |
| 74 | + if (IL1Block(Predeploys.L1_BLOCK_ATTRIBUTES).isCustomGasToken()) { |
| 75 | + revert NotCustomGasToken(); |
| 76 | + } |
| 77 | +
|
| 78 | + // Burn to ETHLiquidity contract. |
| 79 | + this.burn{ value: msg.value }(); |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | + // Send message to other chain. |
| 82 | + IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(Predeploys.L2_TO_L2_CROSS_DOMAIN_MESSENGER).sendMessage({ |
| 83 | + _destination: _chainId, |
| 84 | + _target: address(this), |
| 85 | + _message: abi.encodeCall(this.relayETH, (msg.sender, _to, msg.value)) |
| 86 | + }); |
| 87 | + emit SendETH(msg.sender, _to, msg.value, _chainId); |
| 88 | +} |
| 89 | +
|
| 90 | +/// @notice Relays ETH received from another chain. |
| 91 | +/// @param _from Address of the msg.sender of sendETH on the source chain. |
| 92 | +/// @param _to Address to relay ETH to. |
| 93 | +/// @param _amount Amount of ETH to relay. |
| 94 | +function relayETH(address _from, address _to, uint256 _amount) external { |
| 95 | + IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger messenger = IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(Predeploys.L2_TO_L2_CROSS_DOMAIN_MESSENGER); |
| 96 | + if (msg.sender != address(messenger)) revert Unauthorized(); |
| 97 | + if (messenger.crossDomainMessageSender() != address(this)) revert Unauthorized(); |
| 98 | + if (IL1Block(Predeploys.L1_BLOCK_ATTRIBUTES).isCustomGasToken()) { |
| 99 | + revert NotCustomGasToken(); |
| 100 | + } |
| 101 | +
|
| 102 | + this.mint(_to, _amount); |
| 103 | + emit RelayETH(_from, _to, _amount, messenger.crossDomainMessageSource()); |
| 104 | +} |
| 105 | +``` |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +# Considerations |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +## Custom Gas Token Chains |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +To simplify the solution, custom gas token chains will not be supported and must follow the original four-transaction flow, which includes wrapping and unwrapping `SuperchainWETH`. |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +# Open Questions |
| 114 | +- **Long-term improvements**: Could this functionality eventually extend to custom gas token chains? |
| 115 | +- **Rollbacks**: How would rollbacks be handled in this implementation? |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +# Alternatives Considered |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +## Integrate `ETH` transfer into `SuperchainWETH` |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +Add two new functions to the `SuperchainWETH` contract: `SendETH` and `RelayETH`. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +### `SendETH` |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +The `SendETH` function combines the first two transactions as follows: |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +1. Burns `ETH` within the `ETHLiquidity` contract equivalent to the `ETH` sent. |
| 128 | +2. Sends a message to the destination chain encoding a call to `RelayETH`. |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +### `RelayETH` |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +The `RelayETH` function combines the last two transactions as follows: |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +1. Mints the specified `_amount` of `ETH` from the `ETHLiquidity` contract. |
| 135 | +2. Sends the minted `ETH` to the specified recipient. |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +### Contract changes |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +```solidity |
| 140 | +/// @notice Sends ETH to some target address on another chain. |
| 141 | +/// @param _to Address to send tokens to. |
| 142 | +/// @param _chainId Chain ID of the destination chain. |
| 143 | +function sendETH(address _to, uint256 _chainId) public payable { |
| 144 | + if (IL1Block(Predeploys.L1_BLOCK_ATTRIBUTES).isCustomGasToken()) { |
| 145 | + revert NotCustomGasToken(); |
| 146 | + } |
| 147 | +
|
| 148 | + // Burn to ETHLiquidity contract. |
| 149 | + IETHLiquidity(Predeploys.ETH_LIQUIDITY).burn{ value: msg.value }(); |
| 150 | +
|
| 151 | + // Send message to other chain. |
| 152 | + IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(Predeploys.L2_TO_L2_CROSS_DOMAIN_MESSENGER).sendMessage({ |
| 153 | + _destination: _chainId, |
| 154 | + _target: address(this), |
| 155 | + _message: abi.encodeCall(this.relayETH, (msg.sender, _to, msg.value)) |
| 156 | + }); |
| 157 | +
|
| 158 | + // Emit event. |
| 159 | + emit SendETH(msg.sender, _to, msg.value, _chainId); |
| 160 | +} |
| 161 | +
|
| 162 | +/// @notice Relays ETH received from another chain. |
| 163 | +/// @param _from Address of the msg.sender of sendETH on the source chain. |
| 164 | +/// @param _to Address to relay tokens to. |
| 165 | +/// @param _amount Amount of tokens to relay. |
| 166 | +function relayETH(address _from, address _to, uint256 _amount) external { |
| 167 | + // Receive message from other chain. |
| 168 | + IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger messenger = IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(Predeploys.L2_TO_L2_CROSS_DOMAIN_MESSENGER); |
| 169 | + if (msg.sender != address(messenger)) revert CallerNotL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(); |
| 170 | + if (messenger.crossDomainMessageSender() != address(this)) revert InvalidCrossDomainSender(); |
| 171 | + if (IL1Block(Predeploys.L1_BLOCK_ATTRIBUTES).isCustomGasToken()) { |
| 172 | + revert NotCustomGasToken(); |
| 173 | + } |
| 174 | +
|
| 175 | + // Mint from ETHLiquidity contract. |
| 176 | + IETHLiquidity(Predeploys.ETH_LIQUIDITY).mint(_amount); |
| 177 | +
|
| 178 | + // Get source chain ID. |
| 179 | + uint256 source = messenger.crossDomainMessageSource(); |
| 180 | +
|
| 181 | + new SafeSend{ value: _amount }(payable(_to)); |
| 182 | +
|
| 183 | + // Emit event. |
| 184 | + emit RelayETH(_from, _to, _amount, source); |
| 185 | +} |
| 186 | +``` |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +### Advantages |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +Since the `SuperchainWETH` contract already has permissions to mint and burn `ETH` with the `ETHLiquidity` contract no changes to the `ETHLiquidity` contract are necessary. Any security risks with this change are limited to `SuperchainWETH` and do not affect other `SuperchainERC20` tokens. |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +### Downsides |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +This approach introduces an additional entry point for asset transfers outside of `SuperchainTokenBridge`. While SuperchainERC20 tokens that implement custom bridging will already have alternative entry points, adding another for native `ETH` transfers could lead to confusion and diverge from a clean separation of concerns. Additionally, by having `SuperchainWETH` serve as both a `SuperchainERC20` and a bridge for native `ETH`, there is an increased risk of ambiguity around its dual function, which could impact usability and clarity for developers. |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +## Integrate `ETH` transfer into `SuperchainTokenBridge` |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +One alternative is to add two new functions to the `SuperchainTokenBridge` contract: `SendETH` and `RelayETH`. |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +```solidity |
| 201 | +/// @notice Sends ETH to a target address on another chain. |
| 202 | +/// @param _to Address to send ETH to. |
| 203 | +/// @param _amount Amount of ETH to send. |
| 204 | +/// @param _chainId Chain ID of the destination chain. |
| 205 | +/// @return msgHash_ Hash of the message sent. |
| 206 | +function sendETH(address _to, uint256 _amount, uint256 _chainId) external payable returns (bytes32 msgHash_) { |
| 207 | + if (_to == address(0)) revert ZeroAddress(); |
| 208 | +
|
| 209 | + ISuperchainWETH(payable(Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH)).deposit{ value: msg.value }(); |
| 210 | + ISuperchainWETH(payable(Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH)).crosschainBurn(msg.sender, msg.value); |
| 211 | +
|
| 212 | + bytes memory message = abi.encodeCall(this.relayETH, (msg.sender, _to, _amount)); |
| 213 | + msgHash_ = IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(MESSENGER).sendMessage(_chainId, address(this), message); |
| 214 | +
|
| 215 | + emit SendERC20(Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH, msg.sender, _to, _amount, _chainId); |
| 216 | +} |
| 217 | +
|
| 218 | +/// @notice Relays ETH received from another chain. |
| 219 | +/// @param _from Address of the msg.sender of sendETH on the source chain. |
| 220 | +/// @param _to Address to relay ETH to. |
| 221 | +/// @param _amount Amount of ETH to relay. |
| 222 | +function relayETH(address _from, address _to, uint256 _amount) external { |
| 223 | + if (msg.sender != MESSENGER) revert Unauthorized(); |
| 224 | +
|
| 225 | + (address crossDomainMessageSender, uint256 source) = |
| 226 | + IL2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger(MESSENGER).crossDomainMessageContext(); |
| 227 | + if (crossDomainMessageSender != address(this)) revert InvalidCrossDomainSender(); |
| 228 | +
|
| 229 | + ISuperchainWETH(payable(Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH)).crosschainMint(address(this), _amount); |
| 230 | + ISuperchainWETH(payable(Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH)).withdraw(_amount); |
| 231 | +
|
| 232 | + new SafeSend{ value: _amount }(payable(_to)); |
| 233 | +
|
| 234 | + emit RelayERC20(Predeploys.SUPERCHAIN_WETH, _from, _to, _amount, source); |
| 235 | +} |
| 236 | +``` |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +### Advantages |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +The advantage of this solution is that `SuperchainTokenBridge`would handle both `ETH` transfers and `SuperchainERC20` transfers, simplifying developer integrations. |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +### Downsides |
| 243 | + |
| 244 | +This solution creates changes to a highly sensitive contract. `SuperchainTokenBridge` has permissions to `mint` and `burn` standard `SuperchainERC20` tokens, so updates must be treated with extreme caution. |
0 commit comments