From 0fff3933301f63c203ee91c5eb372511d3cc9c10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Moros Marco Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 12:41:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing "aggregations" word I think that the sentence "they can only be accessed within the scope of the `nested` query, the `nested`/`reverse_nested` aggregations, or nested-inner-hits" is missing the explanation about what are the `nested` and `reverse_nested` terms. And I guess it must be related to the aggregations that exist for nested objects/documents. Could you apply this change in all ElasticSearch documentation versions? In addition, could you please take the issue I created (https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/28363) about the last paragraph of this same page? I think it is missing a lot of explanations as it is just a short sentence for something that I think it is really important. Thanks. --- docs/reference/mapping/types/nested.asciidoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/mapping/types/nested.asciidoc b/docs/reference/mapping/types/nested.asciidoc index 7c5ed8f65a7ce..b92c0b7af4139 100644 --- a/docs/reference/mapping/types/nested.asciidoc +++ b/docs/reference/mapping/types/nested.asciidoc @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ The following parameters are accepted by `nested` fields: Because nested documents are indexed as separate documents, they can only be accessed within the scope of the `nested` query, the -`nested`/`reverse_nested`, or <>. +`nested`/`reverse_nested` aggregations, or <>. For instance, if a string field within a nested document has <> set to `offsets` to allow use of the postings