Update messages

Author: Happypig375

src/Compiler/FSStrings.resx

@@ -1030,10 +1030,10 @@
     <value>The following fields require values: {0}</value>
   </data>
   <data name="ValueRestrictionFunction" xml:space="preserve">
-    <value>Value restriction: The value '{0}' has an inferred generic function type\n    {1}\nHowever, values cannot have generic type variables like '_a in "let f: '_a". You should define '{2}' as a function instead by doing one of the following:\n- Add an explicit parameter that is applied instead of using a partial application "let f param"\n- Add a unit parameter like "let f()"\n- Write explicit type parameters like "let f&lt;'a&gt;",\nor if you do not intend for it to be generic, either:\n- Add an explicit type annotation like "let f : obj -> obj"\n- Apply arguments of non-generic types to the function value in later code for type inference like "do f()".\nThis error is because a let binding without parameters defines a value, not a function. Values cannot be generic because reading a value is assumed to result in the same everywhere but generic type parameters may invalidate this assumption by enabling type-dependent results.</value>
+    <value>Value restriction: The value '{0}' has an inferred generic function type\n    {1}\nHowever, values cannot have generic type variables like '_a in "let f: '_a". You should define '{2}' as a function instead by doing one of the following:\n- Add an explicit parameter that is applied instead of using a partial application "let f param"\n- Add a unit parameter like "let f()"\n- Write explicit type parameters like "let f&lt;'a&gt;"\nor if you do not intend for it to be generic, either:\n- Add an explicit type annotation like "let f : obj -&gt; obj"\n- Apply arguments of non-generic types to the function value in later code for type inference like "do f()".\nThis error is because a let binding without parameters defines a value, not a function. Values cannot be generic because reading a value is assumed to result in the same everywhere but generic type parameters may invalidate this assumption by enabling type-dependent results.</value>
   </data>
   <data name="ValueRestriction" xml:space="preserve">
-    <value>Value restriction: The value '{0}' has an inferred generic type\n    {1}\nHowever, values cannot have generic type variables like '_a in "let x: '_a". You can do one of the following:\n- Define it as a simple data term like a string literal or a union case\n- Add an explicit type annotation\n- Use the value as a non-generic type in later code for type inference,\nor if you still want type-dependent results, you can define '{2}' as a function instead by doing either:\n- Add a unit parameter\n- Write explicit type parameters like "let x&lt;'a&gt;".\nThis error is because a let binding without parameters defines a value, not a function. Values cannot be generic because reading a value is assumed to result in the same everywhere but generic type parameters may invalidate this assumption by enabling type-dependent results.</value>
+    <value>Value restriction: The value '{0}' has an inferred generic type\n    {1}\nHowever, values cannot have generic type variables like '_a in "let x: '_a". You can do one of the following:\n- Define it as a simple data term like an integer literal, a string literal or a union case like "let x = 1"\n- Add an explicit type annotation like "let x : int"\n- Use the value as a non-generic type in later code for type inference like "do x"\nor if you still want type-dependent results, you can define '{2}' as a function instead by doing either:\n- Add a unit parameter like "let x()"\n- Write explicit type parameters like "let x&lt;'a&gt;".\nThis error is because a let binding without parameters defines a value, not a function. Values cannot be generic because reading a value is assumed to result in the same everywhere but generic type parameters may invalidate this assumption by enabling type-dependent results.</value>
   </data>
   <data name="RecoverableParseError" xml:space="preserve">
     <value>syntax error</value>